Suppr超能文献

经颅磁刺激能影响认知加工:P300 和神经心理学测试研究。

Theta-Burst Stimulation Is Able to Impact Cognitive Processing: A P300 and Neuropsychological Test Study.

机构信息

Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Beira Interior, Covilhã, Portugal,

Dr. Lopes Dias School of Health, Polytechnic Institute of Castelo Branco, Castelo Branco, Portugal,

出版信息

Neuropsychobiology. 2021;80(4):288-298. doi: 10.1159/000511605. Epub 2021 Jan 4.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Theta-burst stimulation (TBS) is a safe non-invasive neurostimulation technique used to improve cognitive and neuropsychiatric impairments. Combined outcome evaluation using event-related potentials (ERPs) and neuropsychological tests may allow a more thorough assessment of TBS treatment efficacy; however, some mixed results have been found, and their use remains scarce. Our main objective was to evaluate whether a session of TBS to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) can impact upon the performance of both neuropsychological and neurophysiological tests.

METHODS

This double-blind sham-controlled study involved 28 healthy adults, between 18 and 30 years. Volunteers were randomly allocated to receive excitatory (intermittent [iTBS]), inhibitory (continuous TBS [cTBS]) or sham stimulation on the left DLPFC. Subjects were evaluated using ERPs (auditory oddball paradigm P300) and neuropsychological tests (Trail making test [TMT] and Stroop test of words and colours [STWC]), using a pre-post stimulation protocol.

RESULTS

Inhibitory stimulation led to significantly delayed P300 peak latencies (p < 0.001), with no consistent change in N2P3 amplitudes. cTBS also significantly influenced the expected group performance in Stroop C and Stroop interference (p = 0.025) compared to the iTBS and sham groups. No significant results were found in TMT tests after TBS.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that P300 and specific Stroop colour and words test parameters can be similarly influenced by the same TBS protocol. This emphasizes the importance of mixed evaluation using neuropsychological and neurophysiological resources in research associated with the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation and cognition.

摘要

简介

经颅磁刺激(TBS)是一种安全的非侵入性神经刺激技术,用于改善认知和神经精神障碍。使用事件相关电位(ERPs)和神经心理学测试的联合结果评估可能允许更全面地评估 TBS 治疗效果;然而,已经发现了一些混合结果,并且它们的使用仍然很少。我们的主要目的是评估左背外侧前额叶皮层(DLPFC)的 TBS 治疗是否会影响神经心理学和神经生理学测试的表现。

方法

这项双盲假对照研究涉及 28 名 18 至 30 岁的健康成年人。志愿者被随机分配接受左 DLPFC 的兴奋性(间歇性 [iTBS])、抑制性(连续 TBS [cTBS])或假刺激。使用听觉Oddball 范式 P300 评估受试者的 ERP,使用预刺激后测试方案进行神经心理学测试(Trail Making 测试 [TMT] 和 Stroop 词色测试 [STWC])。

结果

抑制性刺激导致 P300 峰潜伏期显著延迟(p < 0.001),N2P3 振幅无一致变化。与 iTBS 和假刺激组相比,cTBS 还显著影响了 Stroop C 和 Stroop 干扰的预期组表现(p = 0.025)。TBS 后 TMT 测试未发现显著结果。

结论

我们的结果表明,P300 和特定的 Stroop 颜色和单词测试参数可以通过相同的 TBS 方案以相似的方式受到影响。这强调了在与经颅磁刺激和认知相关的研究中使用神经心理学和神经生理学资源进行混合评估的重要性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验