Alzheimer Centrum Limburg, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Public Health Promotion Unit, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.
Alzheimers Dement. 2021 Jul;17(7):1205-1212. doi: 10.1002/alz.12281. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
Individuals in early dementia prevention trials may differ in how much they benefit from interventions depending on their initial risk level. Additionally, modifiable dementia risk scores might be used as surrogate/intermediate outcomes.
In the Finnish Geriatric Intervention Study to Prevent Cognitive Impairment and Disability (FINGER), we investigated in post hoc analyses (N = 1207) whether the cognitive benefits of the 2-year multi-domain lifestyle intervention differed by baseline dementia risk measured with the "LIfestyle for BRAin Health" (LIBRA) score. We also investigated intervention effects on change in LIBRA score over time.
Overall, higher baseline LIBRA was related to less cognitive improvement over time. This association did not differ between the intervention and control groups. The intervention was effective in decreasing LIBRA scores over time, regardless of baseline demographics or cognition.
The cognitive benefit of the FINGER intervention was similar across individuals with different LIBRA scores at baseline. Furthermore, LIBRA may be useful as a surrogate/intermediate endpoint and surveillance tool to monitor intervention success during trial execution.
参与早期痴呆预防试验的个体可能因初始风险水平的不同,从干预措施中获益的程度也不同。此外,可改变的痴呆风险评分可能被用作替代/中间结局。
在芬兰老年干预研究以预防认知障碍和残疾(FINGER)中,我们进行了事后分析(N=1207),以调查基线时使用“生活方式促进大脑健康”(LIBRA)评分测量的痴呆风险(LIBRA)是否会影响 2 年多领域生活方式干预的认知益处。我们还研究了干预措施对 LIBRA 评分随时间变化的影响。
总体而言,较高的基线 LIBRA 与随时间的认知改善较少有关。这种关联在干预组和对照组之间没有差异。无论基线人口统计学或认知如何,干预措施都能有效地随着时间的推移降低 LIBRA 评分。
FINGER 干预的认知益处在基线时具有不同 LIBRA 评分的个体中相似。此外,LIBRA 可能是一种有用的替代/中间终点和监测工具,可用于在试验执行期间监测干预的成功。