Mangia Cristina, Russo Antonello, Civitelli Serenella, Gianicolo Emilio Antonio Luca
Istituto di scienze dell'atmosfera e del clima, Consiglio nazionale delle ricerche, Lecce;
Associazione Salute Pubblica, Brindisi.
Epidemiol Prev. 2020 Sep-Dec;44(5-6 Suppl 2):400-406. doi: 10.19191/EP20.5-6.S2.145.
scientific literature indicates that there are sex, and gender differences in the development, symptomatology and evolution of different diseases, in the response to drugs and in the therapeutic pathways. Even in the COVID-19 epidemic some sex/gender differences emerged.
to analyze COVID-19 epidemic data by gender and age in Italy, Germany, Spain, and Sweden, characterized by having implemented different pandemic containment policies, with the aim of observing any characteristics that can be interpreted with the lens of sex/gender differences.
we used confirmed cases and deaths associated with COVID-19 for Italy, Spain, Germany, and Sweden from respective national surveillance databases. Mortality data for Italy were also analysed. The period of investigation was March-May 2020. As indicators, we used the case fatality ratio adjusted for time delay and SMR for mortality.
women are more vulnerable to COVID- 19 infection in the 30-60-year age group. Case fatality ratio is higher in men than women, with a ratio men/women equal to 1.7 in Italy, Spain, and Sweden and 1,4 in Germany. The ratio increases in the lower age groups. The analysis of the mortality data observed/expected in Italy in the same period with respect to 2015-2019 shows a comparable excess with SMR equal to 132 for men and 127 for women.
COVID-19 affects both genders with some differences in the incidence, higher in women, and lethality, higher in men. These differences highlight the need to better understand the sex/gender and age interaction both for epidemiological surveillance and for a better gender-appropriateness of the ongoing prophylactic and therapeutic treatments. This would be possible if all health indicators (symptoms, past illnesses, primary and hospital-level health care, hospitalization, etc.) were provided by age and gender. Analysis of the causes of death could help to better understand the increase in mortality for both genders, in particular for women, for whom a lower lethality for COVID-19 appears from data.
科学文献表明,在不同疾病的发生、症状表现和演变、对药物的反应以及治疗途径方面存在性别差异。即使在新冠疫情中,也出现了一些性别差异。
分析意大利、德国、西班牙和瑞典按性别和年龄划分的新冠疫情数据,这些国家实施了不同的疫情防控政策,旨在观察任何可以从性别差异角度进行解读的特征。
我们使用了来自意大利、西班牙、德国和瑞典各自国家监测数据库的新冠确诊病例和死亡病例。还分析了意大利的死亡率数据。调查期为2020年3月至5月。作为指标,我们使用了经时间延迟调整的病死率和死亡率的标准化死亡比。
在30至60岁年龄组中,女性更容易感染新冠病毒。男性的病死率高于女性,在意大利、西班牙和瑞典,男性/女性的比例为1.7,在德国为1.4。该比例在较低年龄组中有所增加。对意大利2020年同期相对于2015 - 2019年观察到的/预期的死亡率数据进行分析,结果显示男性和女性的标准化死亡比分别为132和127,两者的超额死亡率相当。
新冠病毒对两性都有影响,在发病率(女性更高)和致死率(男性更高)方面存在一些差异。这些差异凸显了在流行病学监测以及使正在进行的预防和治疗措施更具性别针对性方面,更好地理解性别与年龄相互作用的必要性。如果所有健康指标(症状、既往疾病、初级和医院层面的医疗保健、住院情况等)都按年龄和性别提供,这将成为可能。对死亡原因的分析有助于更好地理解两性死亡率的上升情况,特别是对于女性,从数据来看她们的新冠致死率较低。