Integrative Oncology Program, The Oncology Service, Lin, Carmel, and Zebulun Medical Centers, Clalit Health Services, 35 Rothschild St, Haifa, Israel.
Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2021 Aug;147(8):2361-2372. doi: 10.1007/s00432-020-03506-1. Epub 2021 Jan 12.
The present study examined the impact of an integrative oncology treatment program in the relief of pain in patients undergoing chemotherapy and/or palliative care.
In this pragmatic prospective controlled study, patients undergoing chemotherapy and/or palliative care were referred by their oncology healthcare providers to an integrative physician (IP) consultation, followed by weekly integrative treatments. Patients attending ≥ 4 sessions during the first 6 weeks of the study were considered to be highly adherent to integrative care (AIC). Pain was assessed at baseline and at 6 and 12 weeks using the ESAS (Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale) and EORTC QLQ-C30 (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire) tools.
Of 815 eligible patients, 484 (59.4%) were high-AIC and 331 low-AIC. Mean pain scores decreased significantly from baseline to 6 and 12 weeks in both groups. However, ESAS and EORTC pain scores improved significantly more in the high-AIC group at 6 weeks (p= 0.008), though not at 12 weeks. Between-group analysis of participants undergoing adjuvant/neo-adjuvant chemotherapy showed higher pain reduction in the high-AIC group at 6 weeks (ESAS, p = 0.006; EORTC, p = 0.046), as was the case with patients receiving palliative care (ESAS p = 0.04; EORTC p = 0.056).
High adherence to integrative care was found to be associated with a greater effect on pain relief at 6 weeks but not at 12 weeks in patients undergoing chemotherapy and/or palliative care.
本研究旨在探讨综合肿瘤治疗方案对化疗和/或姑息治疗患者疼痛缓解的影响。
在这项实用的前瞻性对照研究中,肿瘤医护人员将正在接受化疗和/或姑息治疗的患者转介给综合医生(IP)进行咨询,随后每周进行综合治疗。在研究的前 6 周内接受≥4 次治疗的患者被认为是高度接受综合治疗(AIC)。使用 ESAS(埃德蒙顿症状评估量表)和 EORTC QLQ-C30(欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织生活质量问卷)工具在基线和第 6 周和 12 周评估疼痛。
在 815 名符合条件的患者中,484 名(59.4%)为高 AIC,331 名为低 AIC。两组患者的平均疼痛评分均从基线显著下降至第 6 周和第 12 周。然而,高 AIC 组在第 6 周时 ESAS 和 EORTC 疼痛评分显著改善(p=0.008),而在第 12 周时则没有。在接受辅助/新辅助化疗的参与者中进行的组间分析显示,高 AIC 组在第 6 周时疼痛缓解更明显(ESAS,p=0.006;EORTC,p=0.046),在接受姑息治疗的患者中也是如此(ESAS,p=0.04;EORTC,p=0.056)。
在接受化疗和/或姑息治疗的患者中,高度接受综合治疗与第 6 周时疼痛缓解效果更好相关,但在第 12 周时则没有。