Multidisciplinary Pain Management Unit, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain.
Anaesthesiology Department, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain.
Neuromodulation. 2021 Apr;24(3):448-458. doi: 10.1111/ner.13358. Epub 2021 Jan 18.
The objective of this prospective randomized study of cases and controls was to evaluate the efficacy of treatment with low-frequency spinal cord stimulation (LF-SCS) and 10 kHz spinal cord stimulation (10-kHz SCS) in patients diagnosed with complex regional pain syndrome type I (CRPS) with upper limb involvement.
Fifty patients were randomized to receive conventional treatment or SCS with a commercially available low-frequency or 10-kHz system. Patients were assessed at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. The primary endpoint was at 12-months post permanent implantation of the SCS devices. Outcome measures assessed included: Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), 12-Item Short-Format Health Survey (SF-12), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Study Sleep Scale medical outcomes (MOS-SS), Douleur Neuropathique 4 questions pain questionnaire (DN4), Patient Global Impression Scale on the impact of treatment improvement (PGI-I), Clinician Global Impression Scale on the impact of improving the patient (CGI-I).
Forty-one patients were finally included in the analysis, 19 patients in the conventional treatment group, 12 in the LF-SCS group, and 10 in the 10-kHz SCS group. At the primary endpoint, patients treated with LF-SCS presented improvements in the NRS and DN4 outcomes around 2.4 and 1.5 times above the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) thresholds. At the primary endpoint, patients treated with 10-kHz SCS presented improvements in the NRS and DN4 outcomes around 2 and 1.4 times above the MCID thresholds.
Patients experienced considerable improvement after SCS. The results show that LF-SCS has very good results when compared with conventional treatment. The results obtained with 10-kHz SCS are encouraging, with the advantages of the absence of paresthesia making it an alternative in the treatment of CRPS.
本病例对照前瞻性随机研究的目的在于评估低频脊髓刺激(LF-SCS)和 10kHz 脊髓刺激(10-kHz SCS)治疗上肢受累的 1 型复杂性区域疼痛综合征(CRPS)患者的疗效。
50 名患者被随机分为接受常规治疗或使用市售低频或 10-kHz 系统进行 SCS 治疗。患者在 1、3、6 和 12 个月时进行评估。主要终点是 SCS 设备永久植入后 12 个月。评估的结果包括:数字评分量表(NRS)、12 项简短健康调查(SF-12)、Oswestry 残疾指数(ODI)、研究睡眠量表医疗结局(MOS-SS)、4 项神经性疼痛问卷(DN4)、治疗改善影响的患者总体印象量表(PGI-I)、改善患者影响的临床医生总体印象量表(CGI-I)。
最终有 41 名患者纳入分析,常规治疗组 19 名,LF-SCS 组 12 名,10-kHz SCS 组 10 名。在主要终点时,接受 LF-SCS 治疗的患者的 NRS 和 DN4 结果改善,超过了最小临床重要差异(MCID)阈值的 2.4 倍和 1.5 倍。在主要终点时,接受 10-kHz SCS 治疗的患者的 NRS 和 DN4 结果改善,超过了 MCID 阈值的 2 倍和 1.4 倍。
患者在 SCS 治疗后经历了显著的改善。结果表明,LF-SCS 与常规治疗相比具有非常好的疗效。10-kHz SCS 的结果令人鼓舞,由于不存在感觉异常,因此它是 CRPS 治疗的一种替代方法。