Suppr超能文献

通过体外和体内方法检测医疗器械的致敏潜力。

Sensitization potential of medical devices detected by in vitro and in vivo methods.

作者信息

Svobodová Lada, Rucki Marian, Vlkova Alena, Kejlova Kristina, Jírová Dagmar, Dvorakova Marketa, Kolarova Hana, Kandárová Helena, Pôbiš Peter, Heinonen Tuula, Maly Marek

机构信息

Centre of Toxicology and Health Safety, National Institute of Public Health, Prague, Czech Republic.

Department of Medical Biophysics, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University in Olomouc, Czech Republic.

出版信息

ALTEX. 2021;38(3):419-430. doi: 10.14573/altex.2008142. Epub 2021 Jan 26.

Abstract

Medical devices must be tested before marketing in accordance with ISO EN 10993-10 in order to avoid skin sensi­tization. This standard predominantly refers to the in vivo test but does not exclude the use of in vitro methods that have been sufficiently technically and scientifically validated for medical device testing. It is foreseen that, due to the complexity of the sensitization endpoint, a combination of several methods will be needed to address all key events occurring in the sensitization process. The objective of this pilot study was to evaluate the sensitization potential of selected medical devices using a combination of in chemico (DPRA, OECD TG 442C) and in vitro (LuSens, OECD TG 442D) methods in comparison with the in vivo (LLNA DA, OECD TG 442A) method and to suggest a possible testing strategy for the safety assessment of medical device extracts. Overall, one of the 42 tested samples exhibited positive results in all employed test methods, while 33 samples were predicted as non-sensitizing in all three performed methods. This study demonstrated good agreement between in vitro and in vivo results regarding non-sensitizing samples; however, some discrepancies in positive classification were recorded. A testing strategy is suggested in which negative results are accepted and any positive results in the in chemico or in vitro tests are followed up with a third in vitro test and evaluated in accordance with the “2 out of 3 approach”. This strategy may reduce and replace animal use for testing the sensitization potential of medical devices.

摘要

为避免皮肤致敏,医疗设备在上市前必须按照ISO EN 10993-10进行测试。该标准主要指体内试验,但并不排除使用已在技术和科学上充分验证用于医疗设备测试的体外方法。由于致敏终点的复杂性,预计需要多种方法相结合来解决致敏过程中发生的所有关键事件。本初步研究的目的是使用化学方法(DPRA,经合组织TG 442C)和体外方法(LuSens,经合组织TG 442D)相结合的方式,与体内方法(LLNA DA,经合组织TG 442A)相比,评估选定医疗设备的致敏潜力,并为医疗设备提取物的安全性评估提出一种可能的测试策略。总体而言,42个测试样品中的一个在所有采用的测试方法中均呈现阳性结果,而33个样品在所有三种测试方法中均被预测为无致敏性。这项研究表明,在无致敏性样品方面,体外和体内结果之间具有良好的一致性;然而,在阳性分类方面记录到了一些差异。建议采用一种测试策略,即接受阴性结果,化学或体外测试中的任何阳性结果都要通过第三次体外测试进行跟进,并根据“三选二方法”进行评估。该策略可能会减少并替代用于测试医疗设备致敏潜力的动物使用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验