Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, The University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, The University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Am J Hematol. 2021 Apr 1;96(4):462-470. doi: 10.1002/ajh.26110. Epub 2021 Feb 15.
The ASXL1 and SRSF2 mutations in AML are frequently found in patients with preexisting myeloid malignancies and are individually associated with poor outcomes. In this multi-institutional retrospective analysis, we assessed the genetic features and clinical outcomes of 43 patients with ASXL1 SRSF2 AML and compared outcomes to patients with either ASXL1 (n = 57) or SRSF2 (n = 70) mutations. Twenty-six (60%) had secondary-AML (s-AML). Variant allele fractions suggested that SRSF2 mutations preceded ASXL1 mutational events. Median overall survival (OS) was 7.0 months (95% CI:3.8,15.3) and was significantly longer in patients with de novo vs s-AML (15.3 vs 6.4 months, respectively; P = .04 on adjusted analysis). Compared to ASXL1 SRSF2 and ASXL1 SRSF2 , co-mutated patients had a 1.4 and 1.6 times increase in the probability of death, respectively (P = .049), with a trend towards inferior OS (median OS = 7.0 vs 11.5 vs 10.9 months, respectively; P = .10). Multivariable analysis suggests this difference in OS is attributable to the high proportion of s-AML patients in the co-mutated cohort (60% vs 32% and 23%, respectively). Although this study is limited by the retrospective data collection and the relatively small sample size, these data suggest that ASXL1 SRSF2 AML is a distinct subgroup of AML frequently associated with s-AML and differs from ASXL1 SRSF2 /ASXL1 SRSF2 with respect to etiology and leukemogenesis.
ASXL1 和 SRSF2 基因突变在 AML 中常发生于存在先前髓系恶性肿瘤的患者中,且与不良预后相关。在这项多机构回顾性分析中,我们评估了 43 例 ASXL1-SRSF2 AML 患者的遗传特征和临床结局,并与 ASXL1 突变(n=57)或 SRSF2 突变(n=70)患者的结局进行了比较。26 例(60%)为继发性 AML(s-AML)。等位基因变异分数提示 SRSF2 突变发生在 ASXL1 突变事件之前。中位总生存期(OS)为 7.0 个月(95%CI:3.8,15.3),新发 AML 患者的 OS 显著长于 s-AML 患者(分别为 15.3 个月和 6.4 个月;调整分析 P=0.04)。与 ASXL1-SRSF2 和 ASXL1-SRSF2 相比,共突变患者死亡的概率分别增加了 1.4 和 1.6 倍(P=0.049),OS 也呈下降趋势(中位 OS 分别为 7.0 个月、11.5 个月和 10.9 个月;P=0.10)。多变量分析提示 OS 的差异归因于共突变组 s-AML 患者比例较高(分别为 60%、32%和 23%)。尽管这项研究受到回顾性数据收集和相对较小的样本量的限制,但这些数据表明,ASXL1-SRSF2 AML 是 AML 的一个独特亚群,常与 s-AML 相关,并且在发病机制方面与 ASXL1-SRSF2/ASXL1-SRSF2 不同。