School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China 518055.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Water Res. 2021 Mar 15;192:116845. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2021.116845. Epub 2021 Jan 17.
Somatic and F+ coliphage methods are under consideration as potential routine surface water quality monitoring tools to identify unsafe levels of fecal pollution in recreational waters. However, little is known about the cooccurrence of these virus-based fecal indicators and host-associated genetic markers used to prioritize key pollution sources for remediation. In this study, paired measurements of cultivated coliphage (somatic and F+) and bacterial (E. coli and enterococci) general fecal indicators and genetic markers indicative of human (HF183/BacR287 and HumM2), ruminant (Rum2Bac), canine (DG3), and avian (GFD) fecal pollution sources were assessed in 365 water samples collected from six Great Lakes Basin beach and river sites over a 15-week recreational season. Water samples were organized into groups based on defined viral and bacterial fecal indicator water quality thresholds and average log host-associated genetic marker fecal score ratios were estimated to compare pollutant source inferences based on variable routine water quality monitoring practices. Eligible log fecal score ratios ranged from -0.051 (F+ coliphage, GFD) to 2.08 (enterococci, Rum2Bac). Using a fecal score ratio approach, findings suggest that general fecal indicator selection for routine water quality monitoring can influence the interpretation of host-associated genetic marker measurements, in some cases, prioritizing different pollutant sources for remediation. Variable trends were also observed between Great Lake beach and river sites suggesting disparate management practices may be useful for each water type.
体病毒和 F+噬菌体方法被认为是潜在的常规地表水质量监测工具,用于识别休闲水中不安全的粪便污染水平。然而,对于这些基于病毒的粪便指标以及用于确定修复关键污染源的宿主相关遗传标记的共同出现情况,人们知之甚少。在这项研究中,对培养的噬菌体(体病毒和 F+噬菌体)和细菌(大肠杆菌和肠球菌)一般粪便指标以及指示人类(HF183/BacR287 和 HumM2)、反刍动物(Rum2Bac)、犬科动物(DG3)和禽类(GFD)粪便污染源的遗传标记进行了配对测量,共采集了 365 个水样,这些水样来自六大湖流域的六个海滩和河流地点,采集时间横跨 15 周的休闲季。水样根据定义的病毒和细菌粪便指示物水质阈值分为不同组,根据常规水质监测实践中不同的变量,估计平均对数宿主相关遗传标记粪便评分比,以比较污染源推断。合格的对数粪便评分比范围从 -0.051(F+噬菌体,GFD)到 2.08(肠球菌,Rum2Bac)。使用粪便评分比方法,研究结果表明,常规水质监测中一般粪便指示物的选择会影响宿主相关遗传标记测量的解释,在某些情况下,优先考虑不同的污染源进行修复。还观察到大湖海滩和河流地点之间的可变趋势,这表明不同的管理实践可能对每种水类型都有用。