Zheng Xinghao, Shen Feng, Li Xiang, Yang Guixia, Cheng Yumei, He Tianhui, Li Shuwen, Qin Jincheng, Li Qing, Li Wei
Department of Critical Care Medicine, Guizhou Medical University Affiliated Hospital, Guiyang 550004, Guizhou, China. Corresponding author: Shen Feng, Email:
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2020 Dec;32(12):1479-1486. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20200928-00652.
The effects of low-dose heparin and low molecular weight heparin on the efficacy and prognosis of patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) were systematically evaluated.
Chinese and English databases such as Wanfang data, VIP database, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), China Biomedical Literature Service system (SinoMed), American National Medical Library database (PubMed), Netherlands Medical Abstracts database (Embase) and Cochrane library database were searched for the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of heparin or low molecular weight heparin in the treatment of ARDS. The search time is from July 1999 to June 2020. The control group was given routine treatment, while the experimental group was given heparin 5-10 U×kg×h, or low molecular heparin subcutaneous injected 2 500-5 000 U once every 12 hours for 7 days on the basis of the routine treatment. The main outcome were 28-day mortality, arterial oxygen saturation (SaO), acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II), length of stay in (intensive care unit) ICU and mechanical ventilation time, and the secondary outcome indexes were C-reactive protein (CRP), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin-6 (IL-6), lung injury score, respiratory frequency, activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and prothrombin time (PT) after 7 days' treatment. The two researchers collected data and evaluated the quality of the literature according to the Cochrane 5.1. The stability of the Meta-analysis results was tested by sensitivity analysis, and the publication bias was included in the funnel chart analysis.
Fourteen Chinese literatures were included, with a total of 894 cases, including 454 cases in the experimental group and 440 cases in the control group. The results of Meta-analysis showed that the 28-day fatality rate in the experimental group was significantly lower than that in the control group [relative risk (RR) = 0.54, 95% confidence interval (95%CI) was 0.38-0.76, P = 0.000 4], and 7-day SaO significantly increased [heparin: mean difference (MD) = 48.27, 95%CI was 29.95-66.59, P < 0.000 01]. Low molecular weight heparin: MD = 56.67, 95%CI was 41.22-71.13, P < 0.000 01]. Compared with the control group, the APACHE II score (MD = -4.28, 95%CI was -5.15 to -3.42, P < 0.000 01), the lung injury score (MD = -1.19, 95%CI was -1.35 to -1.03, P < 0.000 01) and the respiratory rate (MD = -4.76, 95%CI was -6.26 to -3.26, P < 0.000 01) in the experimental group were significantly lower than those in the control group after 7 days' treatment. The time of staying in ICU (MD = -4.85, 95%CI was -6.94 to -2.76, P < 0.000 01) and the time of mechanical ventilation (MD = -2.93, 95%CI was -3.34 to -2.52, P < 0.000 01) in the experimental group were lower than those in the control group. After 7 days' treatment, the levels of IL-6 (MD = -38.50, 95%CI was -59.01 to -17.99, P < 0.000 01), TNF-α (MD = -16.24, 95%CI was -31.11 to -1.38, P < 0.000 01) and CRP (MD = -5.5, 95%CI was -6.47 to -4.27, P < 0.000 01) were significantly lower in the experimental group than those in the control group. However, after 7 days' treatment, there were no significant differences in APTT (MD = -0.55, 95%CI was -1.61 to 0.51, P = 0.27) or PT (MD = -0.41, 95%CI was -1.48 to 0.66, P = 0.45). For the indicators with high heterogeneity, Meta-analysis was carried out again by excluding any study, and the overall effect value did not change significantly, suggesting that the results were relatively robust. Funnel chart analysis was carried out on the indexes with more than 10 articles included in the literature. The results showed that the literature had publication bias, but the bias was small.
Continuous anticoagulation therapy with low dose heparin and low molecular weight heparin can improve the prognosis and reduce the mortality of patients with ARDS.
系统评价低剂量普通肝素及低分子肝素对急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)患者疗效及预后的影响。
检索万方数据、维普数据库、中国知网(CNKI)、中国生物医学文献服务系统(SinoMed)、美国国立医学图书馆数据库(PubMed)、荷兰医学文摘数据库(Embase)及Cochrane图书馆数据库等中英文数据库中肝素或低分子肝素治疗ARDS的随机对照试验(RCT)。检索时间为1999年7月至2020年6月。对照组给予常规治疗,试验组在常规治疗基础上给予普通肝素5-10 U×kg×h持续静脉输注,或低分子肝素2 500-5 000 U皮下注射,每12小时1次,共7天。主要结局指标为28天死亡率、动脉血氧饱和度(SaO)、急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统II(APACHE II)、重症监护病房(ICU)住院时间及机械通气时间,次要结局指标为治疗7天后的C反应蛋白(CRP)、肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)、白细胞介素-6(IL-6)、肺损伤评分、呼吸频率、活化部分凝血活酶时间(APTT)及凝血酶原时间(PT)。由两名研究人员收集数据,并根据Cochrane 5.1评价文献质量。通过敏感性分析检验Meta分析结果的稳定性,并采用漏斗图分析纳入文献的发表偏倚。
共纳入14篇中文文献,共894例患者,其中试验组454例,对照组440例。Meta分析结果显示,试验组28天病死率显著低于对照组[相对危险度(RR)=0.54,95%置信区间(95%CI)为0.38-0.76,P=0.000 4],7天时SaO显著升高[普通肝素:平均差(MD)=48.27,95%CI为29.95-66.59,P<0.000 01;低分子肝素:MD=56.67,95%CI为41.22-71.13,P<0.000 01]。与对照组相比,试验组治疗7天后APACHE II评分(MD=-4.28,95%CI为-5.15至-3.42,P<0.000 01)、肺损伤评分(MD=-1.19,95%CI为-1.35至-1.03,P<0.000 01)及呼吸频率(MD=-4.76,95%CI为-6.26至-3.26,P<0.000 01)均显著低于对照组。试验组ICU住院时间(MD=-4.85,95%CI为-6.94至-2.76,P<0.000 01)及机械通气时间(MD=-2.93,95%CI为-3.34至-2.52,P<0.000 01)均短于对照组。治疗7天后,试验组IL-6(MD=-38.50,95%CI为-59.01至-17.99,P<0.000 01)、TNF-α(MD=-16.24,95%CI为-31.11至-1.38,P<0.000 01)及CRP(MD=-5.5,95%CI为-6.47至-4.27,P<0.000 01)水平均显著低于对照组。然而,治疗7天后,APTT(MD=-0.55,95%CI为-1.61至0.51,P=0.27)及PT(MD=-0.41,95%CI为-1.48至0.66,P=0.45)差异无统计学意义。对于异质性较高的指标,逐一剔除任何一篇研究后再次进行Meta分析,总体效应值未发生显著改变,提示结果较为稳健。对纳入文献数大于10篇的指标进行漏斗图分析,结果显示存在发表偏倚,但偏倚较小。
低剂量普通肝素及低分子肝素持续抗凝治疗可改善ARDS患者预后,降低死亡率。