Suppr超能文献

应用英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所数字健康技术证据标准框架评估用于2型糖尿病自我管理的移动交付技术:范围审查

Application of the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Evidence Standards Framework for Digital Health Technologies in Assessing Mobile-Delivered Technologies for the Self-Management of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Scoping Review.

作者信息

Forsyth Jessica R, Chase Hannah, Roberts Nia W, Armitage Laura C, Farmer Andrew J

机构信息

Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.

Bodleian Health Care Libraries, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.

出版信息

JMIR Diabetes. 2021 Feb 16;6(1):e23687. doi: 10.2196/23687.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is a growing role of digital health technologies (DHTs) in the management of chronic health conditions, specifically type 2 diabetes. It is increasingly important that health technologies meet the evidence standards for health care settings. In 2019, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) published the NICE Evidence Standards Framework for DHTs. This provides guidance for evaluating the effectiveness and economic value of DHTs in health care settings in the United Kingdom.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to assess whether scientific articles on DHTs for the self-management of type 2 diabetes mellitus report the evidence suggested for implementation in clinical practice, as described in the NICE Evidence Standards Framework for DHTs.

METHODS

We performed a scoping review of published articles and searched 5 databases to identify systematic reviews and primary studies of mobile device-delivered DHTs that provide self-management support for adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus. The evidence reported within articles was assessed against standards described in the NICE framework.

RESULTS

The database search yielded 715 systematic reviews, of which, 45 were relevant and together included 59 eligible primary studies. Within these, there were 39 unique technologies. Using the NICE framework, 13 technologies met best practice standards, 3 met minimum standards only, and 23 technologies did not meet minimum standards.

CONCLUSIONS

On the assessment of peer-reviewed publications, over half of the identified DHTs did not appear to meet the minimum evidence standards recommended by the NICE framework. The most common reasons for studies of DHTs not meeting these evidence standards included the absence of a comparator group, no previous justification of sample size, no measurable improvement in condition-related outcomes, and a lack of statistical data analysis. This report provides information that will enable researchers and digital health developers to address these limitations when designing, delivering, and reporting digital health technology research in the future.

摘要

背景

数字健康技术(DHTs)在慢性健康状况管理中,尤其是2型糖尿病管理中的作用日益凸显。健康技术符合医疗保健环境的证据标准变得越发重要。2019年,英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所(NICE)发布了DHTs的NICE证据标准框架。这为评估DHTs在英国医疗保健环境中的有效性和经济价值提供了指导。

目的

本研究旨在评估关于用于2型糖尿病自我管理的DHTs的科学文章是否报告了如NICE DHTs证据标准框架中所述的、建议在临床实践中实施的证据。

方法

我们对已发表的文章进行了范围综述,并搜索了5个数据库,以识别对成年2型糖尿病患者提供自我管理支持的移动设备交付的DHTs的系统评价和原始研究。文章中报告的证据依据NICE框架中描述的标准进行评估。

结果

数据库搜索产生了715项系统评价,其中45项相关,共包括59项符合条件的原始研究。其中有39种独特技术。使用NICE框架,13种技术符合最佳实践标准,3种仅符合最低标准,23种技术未达到最低标准。

结论

在对同行评审出版物的评估中,超过一半的已识别DHTs似乎未达到NICE框架推荐的最低证据标准。DHTs研究未达到这些证据标准的最常见原因包括缺乏对照组、样本量无前瞻性依据、病情相关结局无可测量的改善以及缺乏统计数据分析。本报告提供的信息将使研究人员和数字健康开发者在未来设计、提供和报告数字健康技术研究时能够解决这些局限性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d80d/7925151/3f7473fea729/diabetes_v6i1e23687_fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验