Kumar Jayaprakash, Alam Mohammad Masudul, Johnson Karen Chandler
Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN 38163, USA.
Department of Health Behavior and Health Education, Fay W. Boozman College of Public Health, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas 72205, USA.
Indian J Palliat Care. 2020 Oct-Dec;26(4):444-456. doi: 10.4103/IJPC.IJPC_24_20. Epub 2020 Nov 19.
The presence of lung cancer is almost always associated with pain, a symptom that causes severe distress in patients. Although many pharmacological methods are available to manage pain in this oncologic population, the medications often cause undesirable sideeffects and inadequate relief. Nonpharmacological interventions can be used as adjuvants to pharmacological interventions in reducing pain and increasing quality of life.
The purpose of this review is to compare the efficacy of nonpharmacological interventions in reducing pain in lung cancer patients.
This is a systematic review study guided by the Preferred Reporting Items of Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocol. Interventions identified in the present systematic review have been categorized as physical treatment, technologybased, cognitive behavioral, coping, and coaching.
Results indicate that the nonpharmacological interventions such as physical treatment interventions, selfmanagement and coaching interventions, cognitive behavioral interventions, and technologybased interventions or coping skills interventions had limited and shortterm effects on alleviating pain among the patients. However, previous studies have provided limited evidence regarding nonpharmacologic therapy due to the lack of a comparison group, small sample sizes, and lack of longterm followup periods to determine whether sustained effects are feasible.
Healthcare professionals should consider additional research on the added advantage of utilizing the nonpharmacological interventions as an adjunct option while managing pain in lung cancer patients.
肺癌的存在几乎总是与疼痛相关,疼痛是一种给患者带来严重痛苦的症状。尽管有许多药理学方法可用于控制这一肿瘤患者群体的疼痛,但这些药物常常会引起不良副作用且缓解效果不佳。非药物干预可作为药理学干预的辅助手段,用于减轻疼痛并提高生活质量。
本综述的目的是比较非药物干预在减轻肺癌患者疼痛方面的疗效。
这是一项遵循系统评价与Meta分析优先报告条目指南的系统评价研究。在本系统评价中确定的干预措施已被分类为物理治疗、基于技术的干预、认知行为干预、应对干预和指导干预。
结果表明,物理治疗干预、自我管理与指导干预、认知行为干预、基于技术的干预或应对技能干预等非药物干预措施对缓解患者疼痛的效果有限且持续时间短。然而,由于缺乏对照组、样本量小以及缺乏长期随访期来确定持续效果是否可行,以往研究提供的关于非药物治疗的证据有限。
医疗保健专业人员应考虑进一步研究在管理肺癌患者疼痛时将非药物干预作为辅助选择的附加优势。