Willamette Valley Cancer Institute, US Oncology Research, Eugene, OR, USA.
Division of Hematologic Malignancies and Cellular Therapy, Department of Medicine, Duke University Health System, Durham, NC, USA.
Lancet Haematol. 2021 Apr;8(4):e254-e266. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(20)30433-6. Epub 2021 Feb 22.
Patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia and high-risk features have poorer outcomes on ibrutinib than those without high-risk features. The aim of this study was to assess the benefit of adding ublituximab, an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, to ibrutinib therapy in this population.
We did a randomised, phase 3, multicentre study (GENUINE) of patients aged 18 years or older with relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukaemia with at least one of 17p deletion, 11q deletion, or TP53 mutation, at 119 clinics in the USA and Israel. Eligible patients had received at least one previous chronic lymphocytic leukaemia therapy and had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2 or lower. We randomised patients (1:1) using permuted block randomisation with a block size of four and stratified by previous lines of therapy (one vs two or more) to receive ibrutinib alone or ibrutinib in combination with ublituximab. Treatment allocation was not masked to patients or investigators. Ibrutinib was given orally daily at 420 mg for all cycles. Ublituximab was given intravenously in 28-day cycles, with increasing doses during cycle 1 (≤150 mg on day 1, 750 mg on day 2, and 900 mg on days 8 and 15) and continuing at 900 mg on day 1 of cycles 2-6. After cycle 6, ublituximab was given at 900 mg every three cycles. The study was initially designed with co-primary endpoints of progression-free survival and overall response rate but due to protracted patient accrual, the protocol was amended to have a single primary endpoint of independent review committee-assessed overall response rate (defined as the proportion of patients who had a partial response, complete response, or complete response with incomplete marrow recovery according to the 2008 International Workshop on CLL criteria) in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was evaluated in the population of patients who received at least one dose of study treatment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02301156, and the final analysis is presented.
224 patients were assessed for eligibility, of whom 126 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive ublituximab plus ibrutinib (n=64) or ibrutinib alone (n=62) between Feb 6, 2015, and Dec 19, 2016. After a median follow-up of 41·6 months (IQR 36·7-47·3), the overall response rate was 53 (83%) of 64 patients in the ublituximab plus ibrutinib group and 40 (65%) of 62 patients in the ibrutinib group (p=0·020). 117 patients, including 59 in the ublituximab plus ibrutinib group and 58 in the ibrutinib group, received at least one dose of treatment and were included in safety analyses. Most adverse events were grade 1 or 2. The most common grade 3 and 4 adverse events were neutropenia (11 [19%] patients in the ublituximab plus ibrutinib group and seven [12%] in the ibrutinib group), anaemia (five [8%] and five [9%]), and diarrhoea (six [10%] and three [5%]). The most common serious adverse events were pneumonia (six [10%] in the ublituximab plus ibrutinib group and four [7%] in the ibrutinib group), atrial fibrillation (four [7%] and one [2%]), sepsis (four [7%] and one [2%]), and febrile neutropenia (three [5%] and one [2%]). Two patients in the ublituximab plus ibrutinib group died due to adverse events (one cardiac arrest and one failure to thrive), neither of which were treatment-related. Five patients in the ibrutinib group died due to adverse events, including one cardiac arrest, one cerebral infarction, one intracranial haemorrhage, one Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia infection, and one unexplained death; the death due to cardiac arrest was considered to be treatment-related.
The addition of ublituximab to ibrutinib resulted in a statistically higher overall response rate without affecting the safety profile of ibrutinib monotherapy in patients with relapsed or refractory high-risk chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. These findings provide support for the addition of ublituximab to Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors for the treatment of these patients.
TG Therapeutics.
与无高危特征的患者相比,接受伊布替尼治疗的伴有高危特征的慢性淋巴细胞白血病患者的结局较差。本研究的目的是评估在该人群中添加抗 CD20 单克隆抗体乌布利替尤单抗对伊布替尼治疗的益处。
我们在美国和以色列的 119 家诊所进行了一项随机、3 期、多中心的研究(GENUINE),纳入了至少有 17p 缺失、11q 缺失或 TP53 突变之一的复发或难治性慢性淋巴细胞白血病的年龄在 18 岁及以上的患者,这些患者既往接受过至少一次慢性淋巴细胞白血病治疗,且东部合作肿瘤学组(ECOG)体能状态为 2 或更低。我们使用区组随机化(block randomization)和大小为 4 的区组对患者(1:1)进行随机分组,按既往治疗线数(1 线 vs 2 线或更多线)分层,分别接受伊布替尼单药治疗或伊布替尼联合乌布利替尤单抗治疗。治疗分配对患者和研究者均不设盲。所有周期中,伊布替尼均每日口服 420mg。乌布利替尤单抗在 28 天周期内静脉输注,在周期 1 中逐渐增加剂量(第 1 天≤150mg,第 2 天 750mg,第 8 天和第 15 天 900mg),在周期 2-6 中继续给予第 1 天 900mg。在第 6 周期后,乌布利替尤单抗每 3 个周期给予 900mg。最初,该研究的联合主要终点为无进展生存期和总缓解率,但由于患者入组时间延长,方案修订为独立评估委员会评估的总缓解率(根据 2008 年国际慢性淋巴细胞白血病工作组标准,定义为部分缓解、完全缓解或不完全骨髓恢复的完全缓解患者比例)作为意向治疗人群的主要终点。在至少接受一剂研究治疗的患者人群中评估安全性。这项试验在 ClinicalTrials.gov 上注册,编号为 NCT02301156,目前报告的是最终分析结果。
对 224 名患者进行了入组评估,其中 126 名患者符合入组条件,并于 2015 年 2 月 6 日至 2016 年 12 月 19 日被随机分配接受乌布利替尤单抗联合伊布替尼治疗(n=64)或伊布替尼单药治疗(n=62)。中位随访 41.6 个月(IQR 36.7-47.3)后,乌布利替尤单抗联合伊布替尼组的总缓解率为 64 例患者中的 53 例(83%),伊布替尼组为 62 例患者中的 40 例(65%)(p=0.020)。117 名患者(包括乌布利替尤单抗联合伊布替尼组的 59 名和伊布替尼组的 58 名)至少接受了一剂治疗,并纳入安全性分析。大多数不良事件为 1 级或 2 级。最常见的 3 级和 4 级不良事件为中性粒细胞减少症(乌布利替尤单抗联合伊布替尼组 11 例[19%],伊布替尼组 7 例[12%])、贫血(5 例[8%]和 5 例[9%])和腹泻(6 例[10%]和 3 例[5%])。最常见的严重不良事件为肺炎(乌布利替尤单抗联合伊布替尼组 6 例[10%],伊布替尼组 4 例[7%])、心房颤动(4 例[7%]和 1 例[2%])、脓毒症(4 例[7%]和 1 例[2%])和发热性中性粒细胞减少症(3 例[5%]和 1 例[2%])。乌布利替尤单抗联合伊布替尼组中有 2 例患者因不良事件死亡(1 例心搏骤停,1 例生长不良),均与治疗无关。伊布替尼组中有 5 例患者因不良事件死亡,包括 1 例心搏骤停、1 例脑梗死、1 例颅内出血、1 例卡氏肺孢子虫肺炎感染和 1 例不明原因死亡;心搏骤停死亡被认为与治疗相关。
与伊布替尼单药治疗相比,在复发或难治性高危慢性淋巴细胞白血病患者中,联合乌布利替尤单抗可显著提高总缓解率,且不影响伊布替尼单药治疗的安全性。这些发现为在这些患者中联合使用乌布利替尤单抗和布鲁顿酪氨酸激酶抑制剂提供了支持。
TG 治疗公司。