Suppr超能文献

外科腹膜肿瘤指数在结直肠癌腹膜转移患者中的准确性。

The Accuracy of the Surgical Peritoneal Cancer Index in Patients with Peritoneal Metastases of Colorectal Cancer.

机构信息

Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands,

Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Dig Surg. 2021;38(3):205-211. doi: 10.1159/000513353. Epub 2021 Mar 3.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The peritoneal cancer index (PCI) is one of the most important prognostic factors in patients with peritoneal metastases from colorectal cancer undergoing cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC). The PCI is determined during laparotomy by 2 experienced surgeons and plays a major role in the decision to proceed with CRS-HIPEC. The primary objective of this study was to determine the accuracy of the surgical PCI (sPCI) by comparing it with the PCI confirmed by the pathologist (pPCI).

METHODS

All consecutive patients who underwent CRS-HIPEC for colorectal peritoneal metastases between February 2015 and June 2018 were identified. Relevant patient- and tumor-related characteristics were collected.

RESULTS

In total, 119 patients were included, 60 males (50.4%). The median age was 64 (IQR 55-71). The median sPCI (sPCI = 11, IQR 6-16) was significantly higher than the median pPCI (pPCI = 8, IQR 3-13, p < 0.001). The total pPCI was lower than the total sPCI in 80 patients (67.2%). In 21 patients (17.6%), the sPCI was overestimated with ≥5 points. Small lesions are more likely to be negative. In patients that underwent resection of their primary tumor prior to CRS-HIPEC, the difference between the sPCI and pPCI was significantly larger (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical calculation of the PCI often results in overestimation. Far-reaching consequences are tied to the macroscopic evaluation of the sPCI, but this evaluation seems not very reliable.

摘要

简介

腹膜癌指数(PCI)是接受细胞减灭术和腹腔热灌注化疗(CRS-HIPEC)的结直肠癌细胞腹膜转移患者最重要的预后因素之一。PCI 由 2 名经验丰富的外科医生在剖腹手术期间确定,并在决定进行 CRS-HIPEC 方面发挥重要作用。本研究的主要目的是通过比较外科 PCI(sPCI)与病理学家确认的 PCI(pPCI)来确定 sPCI 的准确性。

方法

确定 2015 年 2 月至 2018 年 6 月期间因结直肠腹膜转移而行 CRS-HIPEC 的所有连续患者。收集了与患者和肿瘤相关的特征。

结果

共纳入 119 例患者,男性 60 例(50.4%)。中位年龄为 64 岁(IQR 55-71)。中位数 sPCI(sPCI=11,IQR 6-16)明显高于中位数 pPCI(pPCI=8,IQR 3-13,p<0.001)。在 80 例患者(67.2%)中,总 pPCI 低于总 sPCI。在 21 例患者(17.6%)中,sPCI 高估了≥5 分。小病变更有可能为阴性。在先行 CRS-HIPEC 切除原发肿瘤的患者中,sPCI 和 pPCI 之间的差异明显更大(p<0.05)。

结论

PCI 的外科计算常常导致高估。sPCI 的宏观评估存在深远的后果,但这种评估似乎不太可靠。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验