Suppr超能文献

日本一种新型自动化化学发光抗SARS-CoV-2 IgM和IgG抗体检测系统的验证,该系统可同时检测N蛋白和S蛋白。

Validation of a new automated chemiluminescent anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG antibody assay system detecting both N and S proteins in Japan.

作者信息

Yokoyama Rin, Kurano Makoto, Morita Yoshifumi, Shimura Takuya, Nakano Yuki, Qian Chungen, Xia Fuzhen, He Fan, Kishi Yoshiro, Okada Jun, Yoshikawa Naoyuki, Nagura Yutaka, Okazaki Hitoshi, Moriya Kyoji, Seto Yasuyuki, Kodama Tatsuhiko, Yatomi Yutaka

机构信息

Department of Clinical Laboratory, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.

Department of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 Mar 4;16(3):e0247711. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247711. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

PCR methods are presently the standard for the diagnosis of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), but additional methodologies are needed to complement PCR methods, which have some limitations. Here, we validated and investigated the usefulness of measuring serum antibodies against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) using the iFlash3000 CLIA analyzer. We measured IgM and IgG titers against SARS-CoV-2 in sera collected from 26 PCR-positive COVID-19 patients, 53 COVID-19-suspected but PCR-negative patients, and 20 and 100 randomly selected non-COVID-19 patients who visited our hospital in 2020 and 2017, respectively. The repeatability and within-laboratory precision were obviously good in validations, following to the CLSI document EP15-A3. Linearity was also considered good between 0.6 AU/mL and 112.7 AU/mL for SARS-CoV-2 IgM and between 3.2 AU/mL and 55.3 AU/mL for SARS-CoV-2 IgG, while the linearity curves plateaued above the upper measurement range. We also confirmed that the seroconversion and no-antibody titers were over the cutoff values in all 100 serum samples collected in 2017. These results indicate that this measurement system successfully detects SARS-CoV-2 IgM/IgG. We observed four false-positive cases in the IgM assay and no false-positive cases in the IgG assay when 111 serum samples known to contain autoantibodies were evaluated. The concordance rates of the antibody test with the PCR test were 98.1% for SARS-CoV-2 IgM and 100% for IgG among PCR-negative cases and 30.8% for SARS-CoV-2 IgM and 73.1% for SARS-CoV-2 IgG among PCR-positive cases. In conclusion, the performance of this new automated method for detecting antibody against both N and S proteins of SARS-CoV-2 is sufficient for use in laboratory testing.

摘要

目前,聚合酶链反应(PCR)方法是诊断2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的标准方法,但由于PCR方法存在一些局限性,因此需要其他方法来补充。在此,我们使用iFlash3000化学发光免疫分析仪验证并研究了检测抗严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)血清抗体的实用性。我们检测了26例PCR确诊的COVID-19患者、53例疑似COVID-19但PCR检测阴性的患者以及分别于2020年和2017年随机选取的20例和100例来我院就诊的非COVID-19患者血清中的抗SARS-CoV-2 IgM和IgG滴度。根据临床和实验室标准协会(CLSI)文件EP15-A3,验证结果显示重复性和实验室内精密度明显良好。SARS-CoV-2 IgM在0.6 AU/mL至112.7 AU/mL之间以及SARS-CoV-2 IgG在3.2 AU/mL至55.3 AU/mL之间的线性也被认为良好,而线性曲线在测量范围上限以上趋于平稳。我们还证实,在2017年采集的所有100份血清样本中,血清转化和无抗体滴度均超过临界值。这些结果表明该测量系统成功检测出SARS-CoV-2 IgM/IgG。在评估111份已知含有自身抗体的血清样本时,我们在IgM检测中观察到4例假阳性病例,在IgG检测中未观察到假阳性病例。在PCR阴性病例中,SARS-CoV-2 IgM抗体检测与PCR检测的一致性率为98.1%,IgG为100%;在PCR阳性病例中,SARS-CoV-2 IgM为30.8%,SARS-CoV-2 IgG为73.1%。总之,这种检测抗SARS-CoV-2 N和S蛋白抗体的新型自动化方法的性能足以用于实验室检测。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验