Xu Nan-Jian, Yu Liang, Gu Yong-Jie, Wang Xiao-Zhou, Jiang Wei-Yu, Ma Wei-Hu
Department of Spinal Surgery, Zhejiang Ningbo No.6 Hospital, Ningbo 315040, Zhejiang, China.
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2021 Mar 25;34(3):228-34. doi: 10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.2021.03.008.
To investigate the clinical efficacy and superiority of direct lateral interbody fusion combined with posterior percutaneous screw fixation in the treatment of lumbar tuberculosis.
From June 2013 to August 2016, the clinical data of 83 patients with lumbar tuberculosis were retrospectively analyzed, including 55 males and 28 females, aged from 27 to 72 (49.5±13.5) years. These 83 patients were divided into two groups according to different operation methods, 35 cases in group A were treated with direct lateral interbody fusion combined with posterior percutaneous screw fixation;48 cases in group B were treated with anterior traditional extraperitoneal debridement combined with posterior internal fixation. After operation, regular quadruple antituberculosis drugs were continued for 18 months. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, hospital stay, bone graft fusion time and complications were compared between the two groups. Visual analogue score (VAS) of lumbar pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), sagittal Cobb angle, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein(CRP) values before and after operation were analyzed.
The operation was successfully completed in both groups, and the operation mode was not changed during operation. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss and hospital stay were (149.4±13.3) min, (354.3±69.0) ml, (9.4±1.6) d in group A and(116.8±10.0) min, (721.9±172.3) ml, (11.8±1.7) d in group B, respectively, with significant difference between the two groups (<0.05). The follow up time was (24.2±5.1) months in group A and (24.0±5.0) months in group B, there was no significant difference between two groups (>0.05). At the follow-up of 4 months after operation, one patient in group A was found to have enlarged psoas major abscess on the contralateral side, and was cured after secondary operation. No sinus formation, cerebrospinal fluid leakage, internal fixation loosening, fracture or distal junction kyphosis were found during follow-up. The fusion time was (5.1±1.6) months in group A and (5.1± 1.7) months in group B, there was no significant difference between two groups (>0.05). The VAS, ODI score, sagittal Cobb angle, ESR and CRP value of the lesion segment at the last follow-up of the two groups were significantly improved (<0.05), but there was no significant difference between two groups (>0.05).
The two kinds of operation can obtain satisfactory clinical effect. Direct lateral interbody fusion combined with posterior percutaneous screw fixation can reduce intraoperative blood loss and hospital stay, which is conducive to early rehabilitation of patients.
探讨直接外侧椎间融合联合后路经皮螺钉内固定治疗腰椎结核的临床疗效及优势。
回顾性分析2013年6月至2016年8月83例腰椎结核患者的临床资料,其中男55例,女28例,年龄27~72岁,平均(49.5±13.5)岁。根据手术方式不同将83例患者分为两组,A组35例行直接外侧椎间融合联合后路经皮螺钉内固定;B组48例行前路传统腹膜外清创联合后路内固定。术后继续规律四联抗结核药物治疗18个月。比较两组手术时间、术中出血量、住院时间、植骨融合时间及并发症。分析两组术前、术后腰椎疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)、Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)、矢状面Cobb角、红细胞沉降率(ESR)及C反应蛋白(CRP)值。
两组手术均顺利完成,术中未更改手术方式。A组手术时间、术中出血量及住院时间分别为(149.4±13.3)min、(354.3±69.0)ml、(9.4±1.6)d,B组分别为(116.8±10.0)min、(721.9±172.3)ml、(11.8±1.7)d,两组比较差异有统计学意义(<0.05)。A组随访时间为(24.2±5.1)个月,B组为(24.0±5.0)个月,两组比较差异无统计学意义(>0.05)。术后4个月随访时,A组1例患者对侧腰大肌脓肿增大,二次手术后治愈。随访期间未发现窦道形成、脑脊液漏、内固定松动、骨折或远端交界性后凸。A组融合时间为(5.1±1.6)个月,B组为(5.1±1.7)个月,两组比较差异无统计学意义(>0.05)。两组末次随访时病变节段的VAS、ODI评分、矢状面Cobb角、ESR及CRP值均较术前明显改善(<0.05),但两组比较差异无统计学意义(>0.05)。
两种手术方式均可获得满意的临床效果。直接外侧椎间融合联合后路经皮螺钉内固定可减少术中出血量及住院时间,有利于患者早期康复。