Suppr超能文献

快速血培养诊断组对退伍军人事务医疗中心实现最佳抗菌治疗时间的影响。

Impact of a Rapid Blood Culture Diagnostic Panel on Time to Optimal Antimicrobial Therapy at a Veterans Affairs Medical Center.

作者信息

Chiasson Jordan M, Smith Winter J, Jodlowski Tomasz Z, Kouma Marcus A, Cutrell James B

机构信息

Dallas VA Medical Center, Pharmacy Service, Dallas, TX, USA.

University of Texas at Tyler Fisch College of Pharmacy, Tyler, TX, USA.

出版信息

J Pharm Pract. 2022 Oct;35(5):722-729. doi: 10.1177/08971900211000686. Epub 2021 Apr 5.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Utilization of rapid diagnostic testing alongside intensive antimicrobial stewardship interventions improves patient outcomes. We sought to determine the clinical impact of a rapid blood culture identification (BCID) panel in an established Antimicrobial Stewardship Program (ASP) with limited personnel resources.

METHODS

A single center retrospective pre- and post-intervention cohort study was performed following the implementation of a BCID panel on patients admitted with at least 1 positive blood culture during the study period. The primary outcome was time to optimal therapy from blood culture collection. Secondary outcomes included days of therapy (DOT), length of stay, and 30-day mortality and readmission rates.

RESULTS

277 patients were screened with 180 patients included, with 82 patients in the pre-BCID and 98 in the post-BCID arms. Median time to optimal therapy was 73.8 hours (IQR; 1.1-79.6) in the pre-BCID arm and 34.7 hours (IQR; 10.9-71.6) in the post-BCID arm (p ≤ 0.001). Median DOT for vancomycin was 4 and 3 days (p ≤ 0.001), and for piperacillin-tazobactam was 3.5 and 2 days (p ≤ 0.007), for the pre-BCID and post-BCID arms, respectively. Median length of hospitalization was decreased from 11 to 9 days (p = 0.031). No significant change in 30-day readmission rate was noted, with a trend toward lower mortality (12% vs 5%; p = 0.086).

CONCLUSION

Introduction of BCID into the daily workflow resulted in a significant reduction in time to optimal therapy for bloodstream infections and DOT for select broad-spectrum antibiotics, highlighting the potential benefits of rapid diagnostics even in settings with limited personnel resources.

摘要

目的

在强化抗菌药物管理干预措施的同时使用快速诊断检测可改善患者预后。我们试图确定在人员资源有限的既定抗菌药物管理计划(ASP)中,快速血培养鉴定(BCID)检测板的临床影响。

方法

在研究期间,对至少有1次血培养阳性的入院患者实施BCID检测板后,进行了一项单中心回顾性干预前后队列研究。主要结局是从血培养采集到最佳治疗的时间。次要结局包括治疗天数(DOT)、住院时间、30天死亡率和再入院率。

结果

共筛查了277例患者,纳入180例患者,其中BCID检测板实施前组82例,实施后组98例。BCID检测板实施前组从血培养采集到最佳治疗的中位时间为73.8小时(四分位间距;1.1 - 79.6),实施后组为34.7小时(四分位间距;10.9 - 71.6)(p≤0.001)。BCID检测板实施前组和实施后组中,万古霉素的中位DOT分别为4天和3天(p≤0.001),哌拉西林 - 他唑巴坦的中位DOT分别为3.5天和2天(p≤0.007)。中位住院时间从11天降至9天(p = 0.031)。30天再入院率无显著变化,死亡率有降低趋势(12%对5%;p = 0.086)。

结论

将BCID引入日常工作流程可显著缩短血流感染达到最佳治疗的时间以及某些广谱抗生素的DOT,这凸显了即使在人员资源有限的情况下,快速诊断的潜在益处。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验