Institute for Drug Evaluation, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, China.
Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 14;4(4):CD008605. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008605.pub4.
Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) is a potentially serious complication of ovarian stimulation in assisted reproduction technology (ART). It is characterised by enlarged ovaries and an acute fluid shift from the intravascular space to the third space, resulting in bloating, increased risk of venous thromboembolism, and decreased organ perfusion. Most cases are mild, but forms of moderate or severe OHSS appear in 3% to 8% of in vitro fertilisation (IVF) cycles. Dopamine agonists were introduced as a secondary prevention intervention for OHSS in women at high risk of OHSS undergoing ART treatment. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness and safety of dopamine agonists in preventing OHSS in women at high risk of developing OHSS when undergoing ART treatment.
We searched the following databases from inception to 4 May 2020: Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and PsycINFO for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effect of dopamine agonists on OHSS rates. We also handsearched reference lists and grey literature.
We considered RCTs for inclusion that compared dopamine agonists with placebo/no intervention or another intervention for preventing OHSS in ART. Primary outcome measures were incidence of moderate or severe OHSS and live birth rate. Secondary outcomes were rates of clinical pregnancy, multiple pregnancy, miscarriage, and adverse events.
Two review authors independently screened titles, abstracts, and full texts of publications; selected studies; extracted data; and assessed risk of bias. We resolved disagreements by consensus. We reported pooled results as odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) by the Mantel-Haenszel method. We applied GRADE criteria to judge overall quality of the evidence.
The search identified six new RCTs, resulting in 22 included RCTs involving 3171 women at high risk of OHSS for this updated review. The dopamine agonists were cabergoline, quinagolide, and bromocriptine. Dopamine agonists versus placebo or no intervention Dopamine agonists probably lowered the risk of moderate or severe OHSS compared to placebo/no intervention (OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.44; 10 studies, 1202 participants; moderate-quality evidence). This suggests that if the risk of moderate or severe OHSS following placebo/no intervention is assumed to be 27%, the risk following dopamine agonists would be between 8% and 14%. We are uncertain of the effect of dopamine agonists on rates of live birth (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.60 to 1.55; 3 studies, 362 participants; low-quality evidence). We are also uncertain of the effect of dopamine agonists on clinical pregnancy, multiple pregnancy, miscarriage or adverse events (very low to low-quality evidence). Dopamine agonists plus co-intervention versus co-intervention Dopamine agonist plus co-intervention (hydroxyethyl starch, human albumin, or withholding ovarian stimulation 'coasting') may decrease the risk of moderate or severe OHSS compared to co-intervention (OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.84; 4 studies, 748 participants; low-quality evidence). Dopamine agonists may improve rates of live birth (OR 1.21, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.80; 2 studies, 400 participants; low-quality evidence). Dopamine agonists may improve rates of clinical pregnancy and miscarriage, but we are uncertain if they improve rates of multiple pregnancy or adverse events (very low to low-quality evidence). Dopamine agonists versus other active interventions We are uncertain if cabergoline improves the risk of moderate or severe OHSS compared to human albumin (OR 0.21, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.38; 3 studies, 296 participants; very low-quality evidence), prednisolone (OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.05 to 1.33; 1 study; 150 participants; very low-quality evidence), hydroxyethyl starch (OR 2.69, 95% CI 0.48 to 15.10; 1 study, 61 participants; very low-quality evidence), coasting (OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.95; 3 studies, 320 participants; very low-quality evidence), calcium infusion (OR 1.83, 95% CI 0.88 to 3.81; I² = 81%; 2 studies, 400 participants; very low-quality evidence), or diosmin (OR 2.85, 95% CI 1.35 to 6.00; 1 study, 200 participants; very low-quality evidence). We are uncertain of the effect of dopamine agonists on rates of live birth (OR 1.08, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.59; 2 studies, 430 participants; low-quality evidence). We are uncertain of the effect of dopamine agonists on clinical pregnancy, multiple pregnancy or miscarriage (low to moderate-quality evidence). There were no adverse events reported.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Dopamine agonists probably reduce the incidence of moderate or severe OHSS compared to placebo/no intervention, while we are uncertain of the effect on adverse events and pregnancy outcomes (live birth, clinical pregnancy, miscarriage). Dopamine agonists plus co-intervention may decrease moderate or severe OHSS rates compared to co-intervention only, but we are uncertain whether dopamine agonists affect pregnancy outcomes. When compared to other active interventions, we are uncertain of the effects of dopamine agonists on moderate or severe OHSS and pregnancy outcomes.
卵巢过度刺激综合征(OHSS)是辅助生殖技术(ART)中卵巢刺激的一种潜在严重并发症。其特征是卵巢增大和急性液体从血管空间转移到第三空间,导致腹胀、静脉血栓栓塞风险增加和器官灌注减少。大多数病例为轻度,但中度或重度 OHSS 会出现在 3%至 8%的体外受精(IVF)周期中。多巴胺激动剂作为一种二级预防干预措施,用于 ART 治疗中发生 OHSS 风险高的女性。
评估多巴胺激动剂在预防发生 OHSS 风险高的女性中 OHSS 的有效性和安全性。
我们检索了以下数据库,从建库至 2020 年 5 月 4 日:Cochrane 妇科和生殖学专库、CENTRAL、MEDLINE、Embase、CINAHL 和 PsycINFO,以评估多巴胺激动剂对 OHSS 发生率的影响的随机对照试验(RCT)。我们还手动检索了参考文献列表和灰色文献。
我们纳入了比较多巴胺激动剂与安慰剂/无干预或另一种干预措施预防 ART 中 OHSS 的 RCT。主要结局指标是中重度 OHSS 和活产率。次要结局指标是临床妊娠率、多胎妊娠率、流产率和不良事件发生率。
两名综述作者独立筛选标题、摘要和出版物全文;选择研究;提取数据;并评估偏倚风险。我们通过共识解决了分歧。我们报告了汇总结果,即比值比(OR)和 95%置信区间(CI),采用 Mantel-Haenszel 方法。我们应用 GRADE 标准来判断证据的总体质量。
该搜索确定了 6 项新的 RCT,导致本更新综述纳入了 22 项 RCT,共涉及 3171 名发生 OHSS 风险高的女性。多巴胺激动剂包括卡麦角林、喹高利特和溴隐亭。多巴胺激动剂与安慰剂/无干预比较多巴胺激动剂可能降低与安慰剂/无干预相比发生中重度 OHSS 的风险(OR 0.32,95%CI 0.23 至 0.44;10 项研究,1202 名参与者;中质量证据)。这表明,如果安慰剂/无干预后中重度 OHSS 的风险假设为 27%,那么多巴胺激动剂后的风险将在 8%至 14%之间。我们不确定多巴胺激动剂对活产率的影响(OR 0.96,95%CI 0.60 至 1.55;3 项研究,362 名参与者;低质量证据)。我们也不确定多巴胺激动剂对临床妊娠率、多胎妊娠率、流产率或不良事件的影响(极低质量至低质量证据)。多巴胺激动剂加联合干预与联合干预比较多巴胺激动剂加联合干预(羟乙基淀粉、人白蛋白或停止卵巢刺激“滑行”)与联合干预相比可能降低中重度 OHSS 的风险(OR 0.48,95%CI 0.28 至 0.84;4 项研究,748 名参与者;低质量证据)。多巴胺激动剂可能提高活产率(OR 1.21,95%CI 0.81 至 1.80;2 项研究,400 名参与者;低质量证据)。多巴胺激动剂可能提高临床妊娠率和流产率,但我们不确定它们是否提高多胎妊娠率或不良事件发生率(极低质量至低质量证据)。多巴胺激动剂与其他活性干预措施比较我们不确定卡麦角林与白蛋白相比是否能降低中重度 OHSS 的风险(OR 0.21,95%CI 0.12 至 0.38;3 项研究,296 名参与者;极低质量证据),与泼尼松龙(OR 0.27,95%CI 0.05 至 1.33;1 项研究,150 名参与者;极低质量证据),羟乙基淀粉(OR 2.69,95%CI 0.48 至 15.10;1 项研究,61 名参与者;极低质量证据),滑行(OR 0.42,95%CI 0.18 至 0.95;3 项研究,320 名参与者;极低质量证据),钙输注(OR 1.83,95%CI 0.88 至 3.81;I²=81%;2 项研究,400 名参与者;极低质量证据)或地奥司明(OR 2.85,95%CI 1.35 至 6.00;1 项研究,200 名参与者;极低质量证据)。我们不确定多巴胺激动剂对活产率的影响(OR 1.08,95%CI 0.73 至 1.59;2 项研究,430 名参与者;低质量证据)。我们也不确定多巴胺激动剂对临床妊娠率、多胎妊娠率或流产率的影响(低质量至中质量证据)。没有报告不良事件。
与安慰剂/无干预相比,多巴胺激动剂可能降低中重度 OHSS 的发生率,而我们不确定其对不良事件和妊娠结局(活产、临床妊娠、流产)的影响。多巴胺激动剂加联合干预可能比单独联合干预降低中重度 OHSS 的发生率,但我们不确定多巴胺激动剂是否影响妊娠结局。与其他活性干预措施相比,我们不确定多巴胺激动剂对中重度 OHSS 和妊娠结局的影响。