Suppr超能文献

数字 PET/CT 对 [Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT 诊断复发性前列腺癌时诊断确定性和组内观察者间可靠性的影响。

The influence of digital PET/CT on diagnostic certainty and interrater reliability in [Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT for recurrent prostate cancer.

机构信息

Department of Nuclear Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Freiburgstr. 18, 3010, Bern, Switzerland.

出版信息

Eur Radiol. 2021 Oct;31(10):8030-8039. doi: 10.1007/s00330-021-07870-5. Epub 2021 Apr 15.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the impact of digital PET/CT on diagnostic certainty, patient-based sensitivity and interrater reliability.

METHODS

Four physicians retrospectively evaluated two matched cohorts of patients undergoing [Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT on a digital (dPET/CT n = 65) or an analogue scanner (aPET/CT n = 65) for recurrent prostate cancer between 11/2018 and 03/2019. The number of equivocal and pathological lesions as well as the frequency of discrepant findings and the interrater reliability for the two scanners were compared.

RESULTS

dPET/CT detected more lesions than aPET/CT (p < 0.001). A higher number of pathological scans were observed for dPET/CT (83% vs. 57%, p < 0.001). The true-positive rate at follow-up was 100% for dPET/CT compared to 84% for aPET/CT (p < 0.001). The proportion of lesions rated as non-pathological as a total of all PSMA-avid lesions detected for dPET/CT was comparable to aPET/CT (61.8% vs. 57.0%, p = 0.99). Neither a higher rate of diagnostically uncertain lesions (11.5% dPET/CT vs. 13.7% aPET/CT, p = 0.95) nor discrepant scans (where one or more readers differed in opinion as to whether the scan is pathological) were observed (18% dPET/CT vs. 17% aPET/CT, p = 0.76). Interrater reliability for pathological lesions was excellent for both scanner types (Cronbach's α = 0.923 dPET/CT; α = 0.948 aPET/CT) and interrater agreement was substantial for dPET/CT (Krippendorf's α = 0.701) and almost perfect in aPET/CT (α = 0.802).

CONCLUSIONS

A higher detection rate for pathological lesions for dPET/CT compared with aPET/CT in multiple readers was observed. This improved sensitivity was coupled with an improved true-positive rate and was not associated with increased diagnostic uncertainty, rate of non-specific lesions, or reduced interrater reliability.

KEY POINTS

• New generation digital scanners detect more cancer lesions in men with prostate cancer. • When using digital scanners, the doctors are able to diagnose prostate cancer lesions with better certainty • When using digital scanners, the doctors do not disagree with each other more than with other scanner types.

摘要

目的

研究数字 PET/CT 对诊断确定性、基于患者的敏感性和观察者间可靠性的影响。

方法

四位医生回顾性评估了两组在 2018 年 11 月至 2019 年 3 月期间因复发性前列腺癌接受[Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT 的患者,一组为数字(dPET/CT)(n = 65),另一组为模拟扫描仪(aPET/CT)(n = 65)。比较两种扫描仪的可疑病变和病理病变数量,以及不一致发现的频率和观察者间的可靠性。

结果

dPET/CT 比 aPET/CT 检测到更多的病变(p < 0.001)。dPET/CT 观察到更多的病理扫描(83%比 57%,p < 0.001)。dPET/CT 的随访时的真阳性率为 100%,而 aPET/CT 为 84%(p < 0.001)。dPET/CT 检测到的所有 PSMA 阳性病变中,被评为非病理性病变的比例与 aPET/CT 相似(61.8%比 57.0%,p = 0.99)。未观察到诊断不确定病变的比例更高(dPET/CT 为 11.5%,aPET/CT 为 13.7%,p = 0.95)或不一致的扫描(一个或多个观察者对扫描是否为病理性有不同意见)(dPET/CT 为 18%,aPET/CT 为 17%,p = 0.76)。两种扫描仪类型的病理病变观察者间可靠性均为优秀(Cronbach's α = 0.923 dPET/CT;α = 0.948 aPET/CT),dPET/CT 的观察者间一致性为显著(Krippendorf's α = 0.701),aPET/CT 为近乎完美(α = 0.802)。

结论

与 aPET/CT 相比,多位观察者的 dPET/CT 检测到更多的病理性病变。这种敏感性的提高伴随着真阳性率的提高,且与增加的诊断不确定性、非特异性病变的比例或观察者间可靠性的降低无关。

关键点

  1. 新一代数字扫描仪可检测到更多患有前列腺癌男性的癌症病变。

  2. 使用数字扫描仪时,医生能够更确定地诊断前列腺癌病变。

  3. 使用数字扫描仪时,医生之间的意见分歧不会比其他扫描仪类型更多。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d6b6/8452558/e2f58ae1fd0b/330_2021_7870_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验