Department of Neurology, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, UK.
Department of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 16;4(4):CD010682. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010682.pub3.
Depressive disorders are the most common psychiatric comorbidity in people with epilepsy, affecting around one-third, with a significant negative impact on quality of life. There is concern that people may not be receiving appropriate treatment for their depression because of uncertainty regarding which antidepressant or class works best, and the perceived risk of exacerbating seizures. This review aimed to address these issues, and inform clinical practice and future research. This is an updated version of the original Cochrane Review published in Issue 12, 2014.
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of antidepressants in treating depressive symptoms and the effect on seizure recurrence, in people with epilepsy and depression.
For this update, we searched CRS Web, MEDLINE, SCOPUS, PsycINFO, and ClinicalTrials.gov (February 2021). We searched the World Health Organization Clinical Trials Registry in October 2019, but were unable to update it because it was inaccessible. There were no language restrictions.
We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and prospective non-randomised studies of interventions (NRSIs), investigating children or adults with epilepsy, who were treated with an antidepressant and compared to placebo, comparative antidepressant, psychotherapy, or no treatment for depressive symptoms. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: The primary outcomes were changes in depression scores (proportion with a greater than 50% improvement, mean difference, and proportion who achieved complete remission) and change in seizure frequency (mean difference, proportion with a seizure recurrence, or episode of status epilepticus). Secondary outcomes included the number of participants who withdrew from the study and reasons for withdrawal, quality of life, cognitive functioning, and adverse events. Two review authors independently extracted data for each included study. We then cross-checked the data extraction. We assessed risk of bias using the Cochrane tool for RCTs, and the ROBINS-I for NRSIs. We presented binary outcomes as risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) or 99% CIs for specific adverse events. We presented continuous outcomes as standardised mean differences (SMDs) with 95% CIs, and mean differences (MDs) with 95% CIs. MAIN RESULTS: We included 10 studies in the review (four RCTs and six NRSIs), with 626 participants with epilepsy and depression, examining the effects of antidepressants. One RCT was a multi-centre study comparing an antidepressant with cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT). The other three RCTs were single-centre studies comparing an antidepressant with an active control, placebo, or no treatment. The NRSIs reported on outcomes mainly in participants with focal epilepsy before and after treatment for depression with a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI); one NRSI compared SSRIs to CBT. We rated one RCT at low risk of bias, three RCTs at unclear risk of bias, and all six NRSIs at serious risk of bias. We were unable to conduct any meta-analysis of RCT data due to heterogeneity of treatment comparisons. We judged the certainty of evidence to be moderate to very low across comparisons, because single studies contributed limited outcome data, and because of risk of bias, particularly for NRSIs, which did not adjust for confounding variables. More than 50% improvement in depressive symptoms ranged from 43% to 82% in RCTs, and from 24% to 97% in NRSIs, depending on the antidepressant given. Venlafaxine improved depressive symptoms by more than 50% compared to no treatment (mean difference (MD) -7.59 (95% confidence interval (CI) -11.52 to -3.66; 1 study, 64 participants; low-certainty evidence); the results between other comparisons were inconclusive. Two studies comparing SSRIs to CBT reported inconclusive results for the proportion of participants who achieved complete remission of depressive symptoms. Seizure frequency data did not suggest an increased risk of seizures with antidepressants compared to control treatments or baseline. Two studies measured quality of life; antidepressants did not appear to improve quality of life over control. No studies reported on cognitive functioning. Two RCTs and one NRSI reported comparative data on adverse events; antidepressants did not appear to increase the severity or number of adverse events compared to controls. The NSRIs reported higher rates of withdrawals due to adverse events than lack of efficacy. Reported adverse events for antidepressants included nausea, dizziness, sedation, headache, gastrointestinal disturbance, insomnia, and sexual dysfunction. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Existing evidence on the effectiveness of antidepressants in treating depressive symptoms associated with epilepsy is still very limited. Rates of response to antidepressants were highly variable. There is low certainty evidence from one small RCT (64 participants) that venlafaxine may improve depressive symptoms more than no treatment; this evidence is limited to treatment between 8 and 16 weeks, and does not inform longer-term effects. Moderate to low evidence suggests neither an increase nor exacerbation of seizures with SSRIs. There are no available comparative data to inform the choice of antidepressant drug or classes of drug for efficacy or safety for treating people with epilepsy and depression. RCTs of antidepressants utilising interventions from other treatment classes besides SSRIs, in large samples of patients with epilepsy and depression, are needed to better inform treatment policy. Future studies should assess interventions across a longer treatment duration to account for delayed onset of action, sustainability of treatment responses, and to provide a better understanding of the impact on seizure control.
抑郁障碍是癫痫患者最常见的精神共病,约三分之一的患者受其影响,显著降低生活质量。由于对哪种抗抑郁药或药物类别最有效存在不确定性,以及对癫痫发作恶化的担忧,人们可能无法为其抑郁症状提供适当的治疗。本综述旨在解决这些问题,并为临床实践和未来研究提供信息。这是 2014 年第 12 期发表的原始 Cochrane 综述的更新版本。
评估抗抑郁药治疗癫痫伴抑郁患者抑郁症状的疗效和安全性,以及对癫痫发作复发的影响。
本次更新,我们检索了 CRS Web、MEDLINE、SCOPUS、PsycINFO 和 ClinicalTrials.gov(2021 年 2 月)。我们于 2019 年 10 月检索了世界卫生组织临床试验注册平台,但由于无法访问,未能更新。我们没有语言限制。
我们纳入了随机对照试验(RCTs)和前瞻性非随机干预研究(NRSIs),纳入的研究对象为患有癫痫的儿童或成人,接受抗抑郁药治疗,并与安慰剂、比较性抗抑郁药、心理治疗或不治疗进行比较,以评估抗抑郁药治疗对抑郁症状的疗效。主要结局为抑郁评分的变化(改善超过 50%的比例、平均差异和完全缓解的比例)和癫痫发作频率的变化(平均差异、癫痫发作复发的比例或癫痫持续状态发作的比例)。次要结局包括研究参与者的退出人数和退出原因、生活质量、认知功能和不良事件。两名综述作者独立提取每个纳入研究的数据,然后交叉核对数据提取情况。我们使用 Cochrane 工具评估 RCTs 的偏倚风险,使用 ROBINS-I 评估 NRSIs 的偏倚风险。我们将二分类结局表示为风险比(RR)及其 95%置信区间(CI)或特定不良事件的 99%CI。我们将连续性结局表示为标准化均数差(SMD)及其 95%CI,以及均数差(MD)及其 95%CI。
我们纳入了 10 项研究(4 项 RCTs 和 6 项 NRSIs),共 626 名癫痫伴抑郁患者,评估了抗抑郁药的疗效。1 项 RCT 为比较抗抑郁药与认知行为疗法(CBT)的多中心研究。另外 3 项 RCT 为比较抗抑郁药与活性对照、安慰剂或不治疗的单中心研究。6 项 NRSIs 主要报道了使用选择性 5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRIs)治疗抑郁后,局灶性癫痫患者的结局,其中 1 项 NRSI 比较了 SSRIs 与 CBT。我们将 1 项 RCT 评为低偏倚风险,3 项 RCT 评为不确定偏倚风险,6 项 NRSIs 评为严重偏倚风险。由于治疗比较的单一研究提供的结局数据有限,且由于偏倚风险,特别是 NRSIs 未调整混杂变量,我们无法对 RCT 数据进行任何荟萃分析。由于单研究提供的有限结局数据,以及偏倚风险,特别是 NRSIs 未调整混杂变量,我们判断证据的确定性为中等到非常低。RCTs 中抑郁症状改善超过 50%的比例为 43%至 82%,NRSIs 中为 24%至 97%,取决于所使用的抗抑郁药。与不治疗相比,文拉法辛在改善抑郁症状方面的效果超过 50%(MD-7.59,95%CI-11.52 至-3.66;1 项研究,64 名参与者;低质量证据);其他比较的结果不一致。两项比较 SSRIs 与 CBT 的研究报告称,完全缓解抑郁症状的参与者比例没有定论。与对照治疗或基线相比,抗癫痫药物似乎没有增加癫痫发作的风险。两项研究评估了生活质量;抗抑郁药似乎没有改善生活质量。没有研究报告认知功能。两项 RCTs 和一项 NRSI 报告了不良反应的比较数据;抗抑郁药似乎没有比对照组更增加不良反应的严重程度或数量。NRSIs 报告因不良反应导致的退出率高于因疗效不佳导致的退出率。抗抑郁药的不良反应包括恶心、头晕、镇静、头痛、胃肠道不适、失眠和性功能障碍。
目前关于抗抑郁药治疗癫痫伴抑郁的疗效的证据仍然非常有限。抗抑郁药的反应率高度可变。一项小型 RCT(64 名参与者)的低确定性证据表明,文拉法辛可能比不治疗更能改善抑郁症状;这一证据仅限于治疗 8 至 16 周的时间,并不告知长期疗效。中度至低度证据表明 SSRIs 既不会增加也不会加重癫痫发作。目前没有可供比较的数据来告知选择抗抑郁药或药物类别对治疗癫痫伴抑郁的患者的疗效或安全性。需要针对癫痫伴抑郁的患者开展使用 SSRIs 以外的其他治疗类别的抗抑郁药的 RCT,纳入大量患者,以更好地为治疗政策提供信息。未来的研究应该在更长的治疗时间内评估干预措施,以考虑到起效时间延迟、治疗反应的可持续性,并更好地了解对癫痫控制的影响。