Suppr超能文献

急性护理中毛细支气管炎干预措施的比较疗效:一项网状荟萃分析。

Comparative Efficacy of Bronchiolitis Interventions in Acute Care: A Network Meta-analysis.

机构信息

Alberta Research Centre for Health Evidence and.

Cochrane Child Health, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Edmonton Clinic Health Academy, University of Alberta Edmonton, Canada.

出版信息

Pediatrics. 2021 May;147(5). doi: 10.1542/peds.2020-040816.

Abstract

CONTEXT

Uncertainty exists as to which treatments are most effective for bronchiolitis, with considerable practice variation within and across health care sites.

OBJECTIVE

A network meta-analysis to compare the effectiveness of common treatments for bronchiolitis in children aged ≤2 years.

DATA SOURCES

Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform were searched from inception to September 1, 2019.

STUDY SELECTION

A total 150 randomized controlled trials comparing a placebo or active comparator with any bronchodilator, glucocorticoid steroid, hypertonic saline solution, antibiotic, helium-oxygen therapy, or high-flow oxygen therapy were included.

DATA EXTRACTION

Data were extracted by 1 reviewer and independently verified. Primary outcomes were admission rate on day 1 and by day 7 and hospital length of stay. Strength of evidence was assessed by using Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis .

RESULTS

Nebulized epinephrine (odds ratio: 0.64, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.44 to 0.93, low confidence) and nebulized hypertonic saline plus salbutamol (odds ratio: 0.44, 95% CI: 0.23 to 0.84, low confidence) reduced the admission rate on day 1. No treatment significantly reduced the admission rate on day 7. Nebulized hypertonic saline (mean difference: -0.64 days, 95% CI: -1.01 to -0.26, low confidence) and nebulized hypertonic saline plus epinephrine (mean difference: -0.91 days, 95% CI: -1.14 to -0.40, low confidence) reduced hospital length of stay.

LIMITATIONS

Because we did not report adverse events in this analysis, we cannot make inferences about the safety of these treatments.

CONCLUSIONS

Although hypertonic saline alone, or combined with epinephrine, may reduce an infant's stay in the hospital, poor strength of evidence necessitates additional rigorous trials.

摘要

背景

对于毛细支气管炎,哪种治疗方法最有效尚不确定,不同医疗场所之间的治疗方法存在较大差异。

目的

采用网状荟萃分析比较≤2 岁儿童毛细支气管炎常见治疗方法的疗效。

数据来源

从建库至 2019 年 9 月 1 日,检索 Medline、Embase、Cochrane 中央对照试验注册库、护理学及相关健康学科联合目录、ClinicalTrials.gov 和世界卫生组织国际临床试验注册平台。

研究选择

共纳入 150 项比较安慰剂或活性对照药物与任何支气管扩张剂、糖皮质激素、高渗盐水溶液、抗生素、氦氧治疗或高流量吸氧治疗的随机对照试验。

数据提取

由 1 名评审员独立提取数据并进行验证。主要结局指标为第 1 天及第 7 天的住院率和住院时间。采用网状荟萃分析中的可信度评估证据强度。

结果

雾化肾上腺素(比值比:0.64,95%置信区间[CI]:0.44 至 0.93,低可信度)和雾化高渗盐水加沙丁胺醇(比值比:0.44,95%CI:0.23 至 0.84,低可信度)降低第 1 天的住院率。没有治疗方法能显著降低第 7 天的住院率。雾化高渗盐水(平均差:-0.64 天,95%CI:-1.01 至-0.26,低可信度)和雾化高渗盐水加肾上腺素(平均差:-0.91 天,95%CI:-1.14 至-0.40,低可信度)缩短住院时间。

局限性

由于本分析未报告不良事件,因此我们无法对这些治疗方法的安全性做出推断。

结论

尽管单独使用高渗盐水或与肾上腺素联合使用可能会缩短婴儿的住院时间,但由于证据质量较差,还需要进行更多严格的试验。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验