Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Nippon Medical School Tama Nagayama Hospital, Tama-shi, Tokyo, 206-8512, Japan.
Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Nippon Medical School Musashikosugi Hospital, 1-396 Kosugimachi, Nakahara-ku, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, 211-8533, Japan.
Int J Hematol. 2021 Aug;114(2):164-171. doi: 10.1007/s12185-021-03152-4. Epub 2021 Apr 24.
Coagulation disorder is a major cause of death in sepsis patients. Recently, sepsis-induced coagulopathy (SIC) scoring was developed as a new criterion for coagulopathy-associated sepsis. We aimed to evaluate the accuracy of the SIC score for predicting the prognosis of septic shock. We analyzed data from a multicenter observational study conducted from 2011 to 2013. We grouped the participants into those who did and did not use vasopressors, and compared the in-hospital mortality rates of SIC and non-SIC patients. Patients who needed vasopressors were considered to have septic shock. We performed survival analysis adjusted by factors independently associated with mortality. SIC developed in 66.4% of patients who used vasopressors and 42.2% of patients who did not. The in-hospital mortality difference between the SIC and non-SIC groups was statistically significant in those who needed vasopressors (35.8% vs 27.9%, p < 0.01). Cox regression analysis indicated that SIC was significantly correlated with mortality risk in patients who used vasopressors (hazard ratio [HR] 1.39; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.13-1.70; p < 0.01), but not in those who did not (HR 1.38; 95% CI 0.81-2.34; p = 0.23). In conclusion, the SIC score might be a good diagnostic indicator of fatal coagulopathy among sepsis patients who need vasopressors.
凝血障碍是脓毒症患者死亡的主要原因。最近,脓毒症诱导的凝血障碍(SIC)评分被开发为一种新的与凝血障碍相关的脓毒症的标准。我们旨在评估 SIC 评分预测脓毒性休克预后的准确性。我们分析了 2011 年至 2013 年进行的一项多中心观察性研究的数据。我们将参与者分为使用血管加压素和不使用血管加压素的两组,并比较了 SIC 和非 SIC 患者的院内死亡率。需要血管加压素的患者被认为患有脓毒性休克。我们通过与死亡率独立相关的因素进行了调整后的生存分析。使用血管加压素的患者中有 66.4%发生了 SIC,而未使用血管加压素的患者中有 42.2%发生了 SIC。需要血管加压素的患者中,SIC 组和非 SIC 组的院内死亡率差异具有统计学意义(35.8%比 27.9%,p<0.01)。Cox 回归分析表明,SIC 与使用血管加压素的患者的死亡率风险显著相关(危险比 [HR] 1.39;95%置信区间 [CI] 1.13-1.70;p<0.01),但与未使用血管加压素的患者无关(HR 1.38;95% CI 0.81-2.34;p=0.23)。总之,SIC 评分可能是脓毒症患者需要血管加压素时致命性凝血障碍的良好诊断指标。