Laboratory of Psychological Health and Imaging, Shanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Psychotic Disorders, Shanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China; Institute of Psychological and Behavioral Sciences, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China; Brain Science and Technology Research Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Laboratory of Psychological Health and Imaging, Shanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Key Laboratory of Psychotic Disorders, Shanghai Mental Health Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China; Institute of Psychological and Behavioral Sciences, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China; Brain Science and Technology Research Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China; Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing, China.
Neuroimage. 2021 Aug 15;237:118114. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118114. Epub 2021 Apr 29.
Temporal concatenation group ICA (TC-GICA) is a widely used data-driven method to extract common functional brain networks among individuals. TC-GICA concatenates the time series of individual fMRI data and applies dimension reduction and ICA algorithms to decompose the data into group-level components. The default mode network (DMN) estimated using TC-GICA at relatively high model orders (i.e., large numbers of components) is split into multiple components. The split DMNs are topographically different from those estimated using other methods (e.g., seed-based correlation, clustering, graph theoretical analysis, and other ICA methods like gRAICAR and IVA-GL) and are inconsistent with the existing knowledge of DMN. We hypothesize that the "DMN-splitting'' phenomenon reflects the impact of inter-individual variability in data, which is propagated into the ICA decomposition via the data-concatenation step of TC-GICA. By systematically manipulating the amount of variability involved in the temporal concatenation in both simulated and several realistic datasets, we observed that as more variability was involved, the estimated DMN became less similar to the averaged functional connectivity (FC) pattern obtained using seed-based correlation analysis. The performance of the DMN estimation in TC-GICA also exhibited remarkable dependence on the model order settings. Further analyses revealed that the "DMN-splitting" in TC-GICA could be reproduced when involving large variability in the data-concatenation and performing ICA at high model orders. These results were replicated across multiple datasets and various software implementations. When applying ICA approaches that avoid temporal concatenation, such as gRAICAR and IVA-GL, to the same datasets, the estimated group-level DMN was more consistent with the seed-based FC pattern and was more robust to various model order settings. This study calls for caution when applying TC-GICA to datasets expected to have large inter-individual variability, such as pooling different experimental groups of subjects.
时相关联组独立成分分析(TC-GICA)是一种广泛应用的数据驱动方法,用于提取个体间共同的功能脑网络。TC-GICA 对个体 fMRI 数据的时间序列进行串联,并应用降维和独立成分分析算法将数据分解为组水平成分。在相对较高的模型阶数(即大量成分)下使用 TC-GICA 估计的默认模式网络(DMN)被分为多个成分。这些分裂的 DMN 在拓扑上与使用其他方法(例如基于种子的相关、聚类、图论分析以及其他独立成分分析方法,如 gRAICAR 和 IVA-GL)估计的 DMN 不同,并且与 DMN 的现有知识不一致。我们假设“DMN 分裂”现象反映了数据中个体间变异性的影响,这种变异性通过 TC-GICA 的时间串联数据拼接步骤传播到独立成分分析分解中。通过系统地操纵模拟和几个真实数据集的时间串联中涉及的变异性量,我们观察到,随着涉及的变异性量增加,估计的 DMN 与使用基于种子的相关分析获得的平均功能连接(FC)模式变得越来越不相似。TC-GICA 中 DMN 估计的性能也表现出对模型阶数设置的显著依赖性。进一步的分析表明,当在数据串联中涉及大量变异性并在高模型阶数下进行独立成分分析时,TC-GICA 中的“DMN 分裂”可以重现。这些结果在多个数据集和各种软件实现中得到了复制。当将避免时间串联的独立成分分析方法(如 gRAICAR 和 IVA-GL)应用于相同的数据集时,估计的组水平 DMN 与基于种子的 FC 模式更加一致,并且对各种模型阶数设置更加稳健。这项研究呼吁在应用 TC-GICA 于预期具有较大个体间变异性的数据集时要谨慎,例如将不同的实验组受试者进行汇总。