Suppr超能文献

临床检查与多种影像学检查方法在头颈癌诊断中的比较

Comparison of Clinical Examination and Various Imaging Modalities in the Diagnosis of Head and Neck Cancer.

作者信息

Schneider Uwe, Graß Inse, Laudien Martin, Quetz Joachim, Graefe Hendrik, Wollenberg Barbara, Meyer Jens Eduard

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Klinikum Gütersloh, Gütersloh, Germany.

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, St. Joseph-Stift, Bremen, Germany.

出版信息

Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2021 Apr;25(2):e179-e184. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-3402435. Epub 2020 May 13.

Abstract

Squamous cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck (HNSCC) is the most common tumor entity of malignant processes in the head and neck area. Due to the metastasizing behavior of these tumors, the staging is indispensable for the treatment planning and requires imaging techniques, which are sensitive, specific, and as far as possible cost-effective, to benefit ultimately the patient and to ensure optimal care.  The aim of the present study is to compare the clinical examination including palpation, ultrasound and computed tomography (CT)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the diagnosis of neck metastases to make the correct indication for a neck dissection.  Data from 286 patients with HNSCC were analyzed for neck metastases to determine which diagnostic tool is the best to answer the question if a neck dissection is necessary or not. Each study method was examined retrospectively by comparing sensitivity, specificity, the positive/negative predictive value, the positive likelihood ratio and the diagnostic accuracy.  The ultrasound showed a sensitivity of 91.52%, a specificity of 61.67%, a positive/negative predictive value of 76.65%/84.09%, a positive likelihood ratio of 2.39 and a diagnostic accuracy of 78.95%. The clinical examination showed a sensitivity of 75.76%, a specificity of 66.12%, a positive/negative predictive value of 75.30%/66.67%, a positive likelihood ratio of 2.24 and a diagnostic accuracy of 71.68%. The CT/MRI showed a sensitivity of 78.66%, a specificity of 62.50%, a positive/negative predictive value of 74.14%/68.18%, a positive likelihood ratio of 2.10 and a diagnostic accuracy of 71.83%. Radiographically, ultrasound, as well as the clinical examination, could be judged to be free from radiation load and side effects from the contrast medium. The high dependence on the investigator when using ultrasound made reproducibility of the results difficult.  It could be shown that ultrasound was the diagnostic tool with the highest sensitivity, positive/negative predictive value, positive likelihood ratio and diagnostic accuracy by detecting and interpreting metastases in the head and neck region correctly. Whether a neck dissection should be performed depends to a large extent on the ultrasound findings.

摘要

头颈部鳞状细胞癌(HNSCC)是头颈部区域最常见的恶性肿瘤类型。由于这些肿瘤具有转移特性,分期对于治疗规划而言不可或缺,且需要使用敏感、特异且尽可能具有成本效益的成像技术,以便最终使患者受益并确保最佳治疗。

本研究的目的是比较包括触诊、超声以及计算机断层扫描(CT)/磁共振成像(MRI)在内的临床检查方法在诊断颈部转移方面的效果,从而为颈部清扫术做出正确的指征判断。

对286例HNSCC患者的数据进行分析,以确定哪种诊断工具最能回答是否需要进行颈部清扫术这一问题。通过比较敏感性、特异性、阳性/阴性预测值、阳性似然比和诊断准确性,对每种研究方法进行回顾性分析。

超声显示敏感性为91.52%,特异性为61.67%,阳性/阴性预测值为76.65%/84.09%,阳性似然比为2.39,诊断准确性为78.95%。临床检查显示敏感性为75.76%,特异性为66.12%,阳性/阴性预测值为75.30%/66.67%,阳性似然比为2.24,诊断准确性为71.68%。CT/MRI显示敏感性为78.66%,特异性为62.50%,阳性/阴性预测值为74.14%/68.18%,阳性似然比为2.10,诊断准确性为71.83%。在影像学方面,超声以及临床检查均可判定为无辐射负荷和造影剂副作用。使用超声时对检查者的高度依赖性使得结果的可重复性较差。

结果表明,超声是通过正确检测和解读头颈部区域转移灶,具有最高敏感性、阳性/阴性预测值、阳性似然比和诊断准确性的诊断工具。是否进行颈部清扫术在很大程度上取决于超声检查结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4858/8096507/722f37a820c3/10-1055-s-0039-3402435-i0930or-1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验