Clinic of Plastic, Reconstructive, Hand and Burn Surgery, Hospital Cologne Merheim, University of Witten-Herdecke, Cologne, Germany.
Institute for Research in Operative Medicine (IFOM), University of Witten/Herdecke, Cologne, Germany.
Int Wound J. 2022 Jan;19(1):178-187. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13613. Epub 2021 May 10.
Currently, many dressings are commercially available for the treatment of burn wounds. Some of these wound dressings remain on the wound, prevent painful dressing changes, and reduce tissue scarring. Nevertheless, still a wound dressing that is cost-effective, produces good wound healing properties, and has a high patient satisfaction is needed. Standard care of superficial burn wounds differs between burn centres. This study aimed to determine a dressing with easy appliance, accurate pain control, favourable outcome, and cost-effectiveness. Therefore, we compared the widely used but expensive Suprathel with the rather new but much cheaper Dressilk in the clinical setting. In a prospective clinical study, the healing of partial thickness burn wounds after simultaneous treatment with Suprathel and Dressilk was examined in 20 patients intra-individually. During wound healing, pain, infection, exudation, and bleeding were evaluated. A subjective scar evaluation was performed using the Patient and Observer Scar Scale. Both dressings were easy to apply, remained on the wound in place, and were gradually cut back as reepithelisation proceeded and showed similar times to wound closure. Dressing changes were not necessary, and neither infections nor bleeding was detected. Overall exudation and pain were highest in the beginning but declined during the wound-healing phase without significant differences. In the follow-up scar evaluation after 12 months, patients reported overall high satisfaction. Overall, the modern dressings Suprathel and Dressilk (solely made out of pure silk) led to safe wound healing without infection and rapidly reduced pain. There was no need for dressing changes, and they had similar clinical outcomes in scar evaluation. Therefore, both dressings seem to be ideal for the treatment of superficial burns. Because acquisition costs remain one of the main factors in the treatment of burns, Dressilk, which is ~20 times cheaper than Suprathel, remains a good option for the treatment of partial thickness burns.
目前,有许多用于治疗烧伤创面的商业敷料。其中一些创面敷料可以留在伤口上,防止疼痛的换药,减少组织瘢痕形成。然而,仍然需要一种经济实惠、具有良好创面愈合性能且患者满意度高的创面敷料。不同烧伤中心的浅表烧伤创面标准护理有所不同。本研究旨在确定一种易于应用、准确控制疼痛、预后良好且具有成本效益的敷料。因此,我们在临床环境中比较了广泛使用但昂贵的 Suprathel 和相对较新但便宜得多的 Dressilk。在一项前瞻性临床研究中,我们对 20 名患者的部分厚度烧伤创面在同时使用 Suprathel 和 Dressilk 治疗后的愈合情况进行了个体内比较。在创面愈合过程中,评估了疼痛、感染、渗出和出血情况。使用患者和观察者瘢痕量表进行了主观瘢痕评估。两种敷料均易于应用,留在伤口上且随着再上皮化的进行逐渐减少,并显示出相似的伤口闭合时间。无需更换敷料,也未发现感染或出血。总体渗出量和疼痛在开始时最高,但在创面愈合阶段下降,无显著差异。在 12 个月的随访瘢痕评估中,患者报告总体满意度高。总的来说,现代敷料 Suprathel 和 Dressilk(仅由纯丝制成)导致安全的创面愈合,无感染且迅速减轻疼痛。无需更换敷料,且在瘢痕评估中具有相似的临床结果。因此,这两种敷料似乎都非常适合治疗浅表烧伤。由于购置成本仍然是烧伤治疗的主要因素之一,因此 Dressilk 的价格比 Suprathel 便宜约 20 倍,仍然是治疗部分厚度烧伤的不错选择。