Karla D. Wagner, Brandon Koch, and Robert W. Harding are with the School of Community Health Sciences, University of Nevada, Reno. Jeanette M. Bowles is with Centre on Drug Policy Evaluation, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada. Silvia R. Verdugo is with FirstWatch Solutions Inc, Carlsbad, CA. Peter J. Davidson is with Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health, University of California San Diego.
Am J Public Health. 2021 Jul;111(7):1281-1283. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2021.306261. Epub 2021 May 20.
To identify factors that influence when people who use drugs (PWUDs) call 911 for an overdose. We conducted 45 qualitative interviews and 180 surveys with PWUDs who had recently witnessed overdoses in Southern California from 2017 to 2019. We used conditional inference tree and random forest models to generate and validate a model to predict whether 911 would be called. Our model had good in- (83%) and out-of-sample (84%) predictive accuracy. Three aspects of the social and policy environment influenced calling 911 for an overdose: the effectiveness of response strategies employed, the behavior of other bystanders, and whether the responder believes it is their responsibility to call. Even in the presence of policies that provide some protections, PWUDs are faced with difficult decisions about calling 911 and must weigh their own safety against that of an overdose victim. Potential interventions include strengthening training and safety planning for PWUDs, bolstering protections for PWUDs when they call 911, and separating law enforcement response from emergency medical response to overdoses.
为了确定影响吸毒者(PWUDs)何时拨打 911 求助于过量用药的因素。我们在 2017 年至 2019 年期间,对南加州最近目击过过量用药的 45 名 PWUDs 进行了 45 次定性访谈和 180 次调查。我们使用条件推理树和随机森林模型生成和验证了一个预测是否拨打 911 的模型。我们的模型具有良好的内部(83%)和外部(84%)预测准确性。社会和政策环境的三个方面影响了拨打 911 求助于过量用药:所采用的应对策略的有效性、其他旁观者的行为以及响应者是否认为拨打 911 是他们的责任。即使存在一些提供保护的政策,PWUDs 在拨打 911 时也面临着艰难的决定,他们必须权衡自己的安全与过量用药受害者的安全。潜在的干预措施包括加强对 PWUDs 的培训和安全规划,在 PWUDs 拨打 911 时为其提供保护,并将执法响应与过量用药的紧急医疗响应分开。