Department of Dermatology and Laboratory for Inflammatory Skin Diseases, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
AbbVie, North Chicago, IL, USA.
Lancet. 2021 Jun 5;397(10290):2151-2168. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00588-2. Epub 2021 May 21.
Upadacitinib is an oral Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor with greater inhibitory potency for JAK1 than JAK2, JAK3, and tyrosine kinase 2. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of upadacitinib compared with placebo for the treatment of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis.
Measure Up 1 and Measure Up 2 were replicate multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trials; Measure Up 1 was done at 151 clinical centres in 24 countries across Europe, North and South America, Oceania, and the Asia-Pacific region; and Measure Up 2 was done at 154 clinical centres in 23 countries across Europe, North America, Oceania, and the Asia-Pacific region. Eligible patients were adolescents (aged 12-17 years) and adults (aged 18-75 years) with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (≥10% of body surface area affected by atopic dermatitis, Eczema Area and Severity Index [EASI] score of ≥16, validated Investigator's Global Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis [vIGA-AD] score of ≥3, and Worst Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale score of ≥4). Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1) using an interactive response technology system to receive upadacitinib 15 mg, upadacitinib 30 mg, or placebo once daily for 16 weeks, stratified by baseline disease severity, geographical region, and age. Coprimary endpoints were the proportion of patients who had achieved at least a 75% improvement in EASI score from baseline (EASI-75) and the proportion of patients who had achieved a vIGA-AD response (defined as a vIGA-AD score of 0 [clear] or 1 [almost clear] with ≥2 grades of reduction from baseline) at week 16. Efficacy was analysed in the intention-to-treat population and safety was analysed in all randomly assigned patients who received at least one dose of study drug. These trials are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03569293 (Measure Up 1) and NCT03607422 (Measure Up 2), and are both active but not recruiting.
Between Aug 13, 2018, and Dec 23, 2019, 847 patients were randomly assigned to upadacitinib 15 mg (n=281), upadacitinib 30 mg (n=285), or placebo (n=281) in the Measure Up 1 study. Between July 27, 2018, and Jan 17, 2020, 836 patients were randomly assigned to upadacitinib 15 mg (n=276), upadacitinib 30 mg (n=282), or placebo (n=278) in the Measure Up 2 study. At week 16, the coprimary endpoints were met in both studies (all p<0·0001). The proportion of patients who had achieved EASI-75 at week 16 was significantly higher in the upadacitinib 15 mg (196 [70%] of 281 patients) and upadacitinib 30 mg (227 [80%] of 285 patients) groups than the placebo group (46 [16%] of 281 patients) in Measure Up 1 (adjusted difference in EASI-75 response rate vs placebo, 53·3% [95% CI 46·4-60·2] for the upadacitinib 15 mg group; 63·4% [57·1-69·8] for the upadacitinib 30 mg group) and Measure Up 2 (166 [60%] of 276 patients in the upadacitinib 15 mg group and 206 [73%] of 282 patients in the upadacitinib 30 mg group vs 37 [13%] of 278 patients in the placebo group; adjusted difference in EASI-75 response rate vs placebo, 46·9% [39·9-53·9] for the upadacitinib 15 mg group; 59·6% [53·1-66·2] for the upadacitinib 30 mg group). The proportion of patients who achieved a vIGA-AD response at week 16 was significantly higher in the upadacitinib 15 mg (135 [48%] patients) and upadacitinib 30 mg (177 [62%] patients) groups than the placebo group (24 [8%] patients) in Measure Up 1 (adjusted difference in vIGA-AD response rate vs placebo, 39·8% [33·2-46·4] for the upadacitinib 15 mg group; 53·6% [47·2-60·0] for the upadacitinib 30 mg group) and Measure Up 2 (107 [39%] patients in the upadacitinib 15 mg group and 147 [52%] patients in the upadacitinib 30 mg group vs 13 [5%] patients in the placebo group; adjusted difference in vIGA-AD response rate vs placebo, 34·0% [27·8-40·2] for the upadacitinib 15 mg group; 47·4% [41·0-53·7] for the upadacitinib 30 mg group). Both upadacitinib doses were well tolerated. The incidence of serious adverse events and adverse events leading to study drug discontinuation were similar among groups. The most frequently reported treatment-emergent adverse events were acne (19 [7%] of 281 patients in the upadacitinib 15 mg group, 49 [17%] of 285 patients in the upadacitinib 30 mg group, and six [2%] of 281 patients in the placebo group in Measure Up 1; 35 [13%] of 276 patients in the upadacitinib 15 mg group, 41 [15%] of 282 patients in the upadacitinib 30 mg group, and six [2%] of 278 patients in the placebo group in Measure Up 2), upper respiratory tract infection (25 [9%] patients, 38 [13%] patients, and 20 [7%] patients; 19 [7%] patients, 17 [16%] patients, and 12 [4%] patients), nasopharyngitis (22 [8%] patients, 33 [12%] patients, and 16 [6%] patients; 16 [6%] patients, 18 [6%] patients, and 13 [5%] patients), headache (14 [5%] patients, 19 [7%] patients, and 12 [4%] patients; 18 [7%] patients, 20 [7%] patients, and 11 [4%] patients), elevation in creatine phosphokinase levels (16 [6%] patients, 16 [6%] patients, and seven [3%] patients; nine [3%] patients, 12 [4%] patients, and five [2%] patients), and atopic dermatitis (nine [3%] patients, four [1%] patients, and 26 [9%] patients; eight [3%] patients, four [1%] patients, and 26 [9%] patients).
Monotherapy with upadacitinib might be an effective treatment option and had a positive benefit-risk profile in adolescents and adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis.
AbbVie.
Upadacitinib 是一种口服 Janus 激酶(JAK)抑制剂,对 JAK1 的抑制作用强于 JAK2、JAK3 和酪氨酸激酶 2。我们旨在评估与安慰剂相比,Upadacitinib 治疗中重度特应性皮炎的疗效和安全性。
Measure Up 1 和 Measure Up 2 是两项重复、多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的 3 期临床试验;Measure Up 1 在 24 个国家/地区的 151 个临床中心进行,涉及欧洲、北美、南美、大洋洲和亚太地区;Measure Up 2 在 23 个国家/地区的 154 个临床中心进行,涉及欧洲、北美、大洋洲和亚太地区。符合条件的患者为青少年(12-17 岁)和成年人(18-75 岁),患有中重度特应性皮炎(受影响的体表面积≥10%,Eczema Area and Severity Index [EASI] 评分≥16,经过验证的研究者全球评估特应性皮炎 [vIGA-AD] 评分≥3,且最差瘙痒程度数字评定量表评分≥4)。患者按照基线疾病严重程度、地理位置和年龄分层,以 1:1:1 的比例随机接受 Upadacitinib 15mg、Upadacitinib 30mg 或安慰剂,每日一次,共 16 周。主要终点是至少达到 EASI 评分改善 75%(EASI-75)的患者比例和达到 vIGA-AD 反应的患者比例(定义为 vIGA-AD 评分降低 2 级,从基线降至 0 [清除]或 1 [几乎清除]),这两个终点都在第 16 周评估。疗效在意向治疗人群中进行分析,安全性在接受至少一剂研究药物的所有随机分组患者中进行分析。这两项试验都在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册,NCT03569293(Measure Up 1)和 NCT03607422(Measure Up 2),目前均为开放但不招募患者。
2018 年 8 月 13 日至 2019 年 12 月 23 日,847 例患者被随机分配至 Upadacitinib 15mg 组(n=281)、Upadacitinib 30mg 组(n=285)或安慰剂组(n=281),在 Measure Up 1 研究中。2018 年 7 月 27 日至 2020 年 1 月 17 日,836 例患者被随机分配至 Upadacitinib 15mg 组(n=276)、Upadacitinib 30mg 组(n=282)或安慰剂组(n=278),在 Measure Up 2 研究中。在第 16 周时,两项研究均达到了主要终点(均 p<0·0001)。Upadacitinib 15mg 组(281 例患者中有 196 例[70%])和 Upadacitinib 30mg 组(285 例患者中有 227 例[80%])中达到 EASI-75 的患者比例显著高于安慰剂组(281 例患者中有 46 例[16%]),调整后的 EASI-75 应答率差异分别为 53·3%(95%CI 46·4-60·2)和 63·4%(57·1-69·8);Upadacitinib 15mg 组(276 例患者中有 166 例[60%])和 Upadacitinib 30mg 组(282 例患者中有 206 例[73%])中达到 vIGA-AD 反应的患者比例显著高于安慰剂组(278 例患者中有 37 例[13%]),调整后的 vIGA-AD 应答率差异分别为 46·9%(39·9-53·9)和 59·6%(53·1-66·2)。Upadacitinib 15mg 组(281 例患者中有 135 例[48%])和 Upadacitinib 30mg 组(285 例患者中有 177 例[62%])中达到 vIGA-AD 反应的患者比例显著高于安慰剂组(281 例患者中有 24 例[8%]),调整后的 vIGA-AD 应答率差异分别为 39·8%(33·2-46·4)和 53·6%(47·2-60·0)。Upadacitinib 两种剂量均耐受良好。严重不良事件和因不良事件导致停药的发生率在各组间相似。最常报告的治疗相关不良事件为痤疮(Upadacitinib 15mg 组 281 例患者中有 19 例[7%],Upadacitinib 30mg 组 285 例患者中有 49 例[17%],安慰剂组 281 例患者中有 6 例[2%])、上呼吸道感染(Upadacitinib 15mg 组 276 例患者中有 25 例[9%],Upadacitinib 30mg 组 282 例患者中有 38 例[13%],安慰剂组 278 例患者中有 20 例[7%])、鼻咽炎(Upadacitinib 15mg 组 281 例患者中有 22 例[8%],Upadacitinib 30mg 组 285 例患者中有 33 例[12%],安慰剂组 281 例患者中有 16 例[6%])、头痛(Upadacitinib 15mg 组 281 例患者中有 14 例[5%],Upadacitinib 30mg 组 285 例患者中有 19 例[7%],安慰剂组 281 例患者中有 12 例[4%])、肌酸磷酸激酶水平升高(Upadacitinib 15mg 组 281 例患者中有 16 例[6%],Upadacitinib 30mg 组 285 例患者中有 16 例[6%],安慰剂组 281 例患者中有 7 例[3%])和特应性皮炎(Upadacitinib 15mg 组 281 例患者中有 9 例[3%],Upadacitinib 30mg 组 285 例患者中有 4 例[1%],安慰剂组 281 例患者中有 26 例[9%])。
Upadacitinib 单药治疗可能是中重度特应性皮炎青少年和成年人的一种有效的治疗选择,具有良好的获益风险比。
艾伯维。