Suppr超能文献

容量吸收微采样作为资源有限地区多真菌毒素暴露生物监测的替代工具。

Volumetric Absorptive Microsampling as an Alternative Tool for Biomonitoring of Multi-Mycotoxin Exposure in Resource-Limited Areas.

机构信息

Centre of Excellence in Mycotoxicology and Public Health, Department of Bioanalysis, Ghent University, Ottergemsesteenweg 460, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium.

Laboratory of Toxicology, Department of Bioanalysis, Ghent University, Ottergemsesteenweg 460, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium.

出版信息

Toxins (Basel). 2021 May 11;13(5):345. doi: 10.3390/toxins13050345.

Abstract

Biomonitoring of biological samples arises as an effective tool to evaluate the exposure to mycotoxins in the population. Owing to the wide range of advantages, there is a growing interest in the use of non- and minimally invasive alternative sampling strategies, such as dried blood spot sampling or volumetric absorptive microsampling (VAMS). A VAMS-based multi-mycotoxin method was developed and validated for 24 different mycotoxins. Method validation was based on the Bioanalytical Method Validation Guideline of the Food and Drug Administration from the United States and for most of the studied mycotoxins, the results of the performance characteristics were in agreement with the criteria of the European Commission Decision 2002/657/EC. The recovery for the different mycotoxins was not haematocrit dependent and remained acceptable after storing the VAMS for 7 and 21 days at refrigeration temperature (4 °C) and room temperature, demonstrating that VAMS could be applied to assess mycotoxin exposure in blood in resource-limited areas, where there may be a delay between sampling and analysis. Finally, a comparison between VAMS and a procedure for liquid whole blood analysis, performed on 20 different blood samples, did not result in missed exposed cases for VAMS. Moreover, both methods detected similar levels of ochratoxin A, ochratoxin alpha, zearalenone and aflatoxin B1. Given all the benefits associated with VAMS and the developed method, VAMS sampling may serve as an alternative to conventional venous sampling to evaluate multiple mycotoxin exposure.

摘要

生物监测是评估人群中霉菌毒素暴露的有效工具。由于具有广泛的优势,人们对使用非侵入性和微创性替代采样策略越来越感兴趣,例如干血斑采样或体积吸收微采样 (VAMS)。开发并验证了一种基于 VAMS 的多霉菌毒素方法,用于检测 24 种不同的霉菌毒素。方法验证基于美国食品和药物管理局的生物分析方法验证指南,对于大多数研究的霉菌毒素,性能特征的结果与欧盟委员会第 2002/657/EC 号决定的标准一致。不同霉菌毒素的回收率与血球压积无关,并且在冷藏温度(4°C)和室温下储存 VAMS7 天和 21 天后仍保持可接受,这表明 VAMS 可用于评估资源有限地区血液中的霉菌毒素暴露情况,在这些地区,采样和分析之间可能存在延迟。最后,对 20 个不同的血液样本进行 VAMS 与全血分析程序的比较,结果 VAMS 没有漏检暴露病例。此外,两种方法都检测到了类似水平的赭曲霉毒素 A、赭曲霉毒素 alpha、玉米赤霉烯酮和黄曲霉毒素 B1。鉴于 VAMS 及其开发方法的所有优势,VAMS 采样可以替代传统的静脉采样,以评估多种霉菌毒素的暴露情况。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e2b5/8150583/07a607c18f08/toxins-13-00345-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验