Division of Radiation Health, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.
Department of Pharmacology and Molecular Therapeutics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Int J Radiat Biol. 2022;98(3):346-366. doi: 10.1080/09553002.2021.1941383. Epub 2021 Jul 1.
As part of the special issue on 'Women in Science', this review offers a perspective on past and ongoing work in the field of normal (non-cancer) tissue radiation biology, highlighting the work of many of the leading contributors to this field of research. We discuss some of the hypotheses that have guided investigations, with a focus on some of the critical organs considered dose-limiting with respect to radiation therapy, and speculate on where the field needs to go in the future.
The scope of work that makes up normal tissue radiation biology has and continues to play a pivotal role in the radiation sciences, ensuring the most effective application of radiation in imaging and therapy, as well as contributing to radiation protection efforts. However, despite the proven historical value of preclinical findings, recent decades have seen clinical practice move ahead with altered fractionation scheduling based on empirical observations, with little to no (or even negative) supporting scientific data. Given our current appreciation of the complexity of normal tissue radiation responses and their temporal variability, with tissue- and/or organ-specific mechanisms that include intra-, inter- and extracellular messaging, as well as contributions from systemic compartments, such as the immune system, the need to maintain a positive therapeutic ratio has never been more urgent. Importantly, mitigation and treatment strategies, whether for the clinic, emergency use following accidental or deliberate releases, or reducing occupational risk, will likely require multi-targeted approaches that involve both local and systemic intervention. From our personal perspective as five 'Women in Science', we would like to acknowledge and applaud the role that many female scientists have played in this field. We stand on the shoulders of those who have gone before, some of whom are fellow contributors to this special issue.
作为“女性在科学领域”特刊的一部分,本文提供了一个视角,回顾了正常(非癌症)组织辐射生物学领域过去和正在进行的工作,重点介绍了该研究领域许多杰出贡献者的工作。我们讨论了一些指导研究的假说,重点关注一些被认为对放射治疗有剂量限制的关键器官,并推测该领域未来的发展方向。
构成正常组织辐射生物学的工作范围已经并将继续在放射科学中发挥关键作用,确保了辐射在成像和治疗中的最有效应用,并为辐射防护工作做出了贡献。然而,尽管临床前发现具有历史价值已得到证实,但近几十年来,临床实践已根据经验观察改变了分割治疗方案,而几乎没有(甚至是负面的)支持性科学数据。鉴于我们目前对正常组织辐射反应的复杂性及其时间变异性的认识,以及包括细胞内、细胞间和细胞外通讯在内的组织和/或器官特异性机制,以及来自免疫系统等全身隔室的贡献,维持积极的治疗比以往任何时候都更加紧迫。重要的是,无论是在临床上,还是在意外或故意释放后的紧急情况下,或者是在减少职业风险方面,缓解和治疗策略可能都需要涉及局部和全身干预的多目标方法。作为五位“女性在科学领域”的一员,我们要感谢并赞扬许多女性科学家在该领域所扮演的角色。我们站在那些先驱者的肩膀上,其中一些人也是本特刊的撰稿人。