Suppr超能文献

青少年大脑认知发展研究中的有意义关联。

Meaningful associations in the adolescent brain cognitive development study.

机构信息

Department of Psychology and Center for Children and Families, Florida International University, Miami, FL, United States.

Division of Epidemiology, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY 14642, United States.

出版信息

Neuroimage. 2021 Oct 1;239:118262. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118262. Epub 2021 Jun 18.

Abstract

The Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study is the largest single-cohort prospective longitudinal study of neurodevelopment and children's health in the United States. A cohort of n = 11,880 children aged 9-10 years (and their parents/guardians) were recruited across 22 sites and are being followed with in-person visits on an annual basis for at least 10 years. The study approximates the US population on several key sociodemographic variables, including sex, race, ethnicity, household income, and parental education. Data collected include assessments of health, mental health, substance use, culture and environment and neurocognition, as well as geocoded exposures, structural and functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and whole-genome genotyping. Here, we describe the ABCD Study aims and design, as well as issues surrounding estimation of meaningful associations using its data, including population inferences, hypothesis testing, power and precision, control of covariates, interpretation of associations, and recommended best practices for reproducible research, analytical procedures and reporting of results.

摘要

青少年大脑认知发展(ABCD)研究是美国最大的单队列前瞻性纵向神经发育和儿童健康研究。该研究招募了 n=11880 名 9-10 岁的儿童(及其父母/监护人),分布在 22 个地点,每年至少进行一次面对面的随访,至少持续 10 年。该研究在几个关键的社会人口统计学变量上近似于美国人口,包括性别、种族、民族、家庭收入和父母教育程度。收集的数据包括健康、心理健康、物质使用、文化和环境以及神经认知评估,以及地理编码暴露、结构和功能磁共振成像(MRI)以及全基因组基因分型。在这里,我们描述了 ABCD 研究的目的和设计,以及使用其数据估计有意义关联时的问题,包括人群推断、假设检验、功效和精度、协变量的控制、关联的解释,以及可重复研究、分析程序和结果报告的推荐最佳实践。

相似文献

1
Meaningful associations in the adolescent brain cognitive development study.
Neuroimage. 2021 Oct 1;239:118262. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118262. Epub 2021 Jun 18.
2
Risk and protective factors for childhood suicidality: a US population-based study.
Lancet Psychiatry. 2020 Apr;7(4):317-326. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30049-3. Epub 2020 Mar 12.
3
Effects of sleep duration on neurocognitive development in early adolescents in the USA: a propensity score matched, longitudinal, observational study.
Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2022 Oct;6(10):705-712. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(22)00188-2. Epub 2022 Jul 30.
4
Neighborhood deprivation, prefrontal morphology and neurocognition in late childhood to early adolescence.
Neuroimage. 2020 Oct 15;220:117086. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117086. Epub 2020 Jun 25.
5
The utility of twins in developmental cognitive neuroscience research: How twins strengthen the ABCD research design.
Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2018 Aug;32:30-42. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2017.09.001. Epub 2017 Sep 12.
6
Recruiting the ABCD sample: Design considerations and procedures.
Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2018 Aug;32:16-22. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2018.04.004. Epub 2018 Apr 16.
10
Adolescent brain cognitive development (ABCD) study: Overview of substance use assessment methods.
Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2018 Aug;32:80-96. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2018.02.007. Epub 2018 Feb 21.

引用本文的文献

2
More similarity than difference: Comparison of within- and between-sex variance in early adolescent brain structure.
Imaging Neurosci (Camb). 2025 Sep 2;3. doi: 10.1162/IMAG.a.127. eCollection 2025.
3
Social Connectedness and Neurodevelopmental Functioning in Youth: Insights from the ABCD Study.
Adv Neurodev Disord. 2025 May 31. doi: 10.1007/s41252-025-00448-y.
4
Cognitive Control Decision-Making Dynamics Across Internalizing and Externalizing Symptoms in Youth.
Res Child Adolesc Psychopathol. 2025 Jul 23. doi: 10.1007/s10802-025-01351-9.
6
A Bayesian Regularized and Annotation-Informed Integrative Analysis of Cognition (BRAINIAC).
Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2025 Jun 25;74:101569. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2025.101569.
7
Addressing artifactual bias in large, automated MRI analyses of brain development.
Nat Neurosci. 2025 Jul 1. doi: 10.1038/s41593-025-01990-7.
9
Cross-Cultural Paediatric Neuropsychological Assessment: Key Considerations.
Health Sci Rep. 2025 Jun 23;8(6):e70959. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.70959. eCollection 2025 Jun.
10
Transdiagnostic Symptom Domains Have Distinct Patterns of Association With Head Motion During Multimodal Imaging in Children.
Biol Psychiatry Glob Open Sci. 2025 Apr 17;5(4):100506. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsgos.2025.100506. eCollection 2025 Jul.

本文引用的文献

2
Image processing and analysis methods for the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study.
Neuroimage. 2019 Nov 15;202:116091. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116091. Epub 2019 Aug 12.
3
From Many to One to Many-the Search for Causes of Psychiatric Illness.
JAMA Psychiatry. 2019 Oct 1;76(10):1085-1091. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.1200.
4
No evidence for a bilingual executive function advantage in the nationally representative ABCD study.
Nat Hum Behav. 2019 Jul;3(7):692-701. doi: 10.1038/s41562-019-0609-3. Epub 2019 May 20.
6
The Challenges and Opportunities of Small Effects: The New Normal in Academic Psychiatry.
JAMA Psychiatry. 2019 Apr 1;76(4):353-354. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.4540.
9
Common Disease Is More Complex Than Implied by the Core Gene Omnigenic Model.
Cell. 2018 Jun 14;173(7):1573-1580. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.05.051.
10
Recruiting the ABCD sample: Design considerations and procedures.
Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2018 Aug;32:16-22. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2018.04.004. Epub 2018 Apr 16.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验