Biological Research Laboratory, Goiano Federal Institute, Goiano Federal Institute, Urutaí, GO, Brazil; Post-Graduation Program in Environmental Sciences, Federal University of Goiás, Goiânia, GO, Brazil.
Laboratory of Environmental Biotechnology and Ecotoxicology, Institute of Tropical Pathology and Public Health, Federal University of Goiás, Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil.
Chemosphere. 2021 Nov;283:131090. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.131090. Epub 2021 Jun 14.
Although the toxicity of microplastics (MPs) and nanoplastics (NPs) is recognized at different trophic levels, our know-how about their effects on amphibians is limited. Thus, we present and discuss the current state on studies involving amphibians and plastic particles, based on a broad approach to studies published in the last 5 years. To search for the articles, the ISI Web of Science, ScienceDirect, and Scopus databases were consulted, using different descriptors related to the topic of study. After the systematic search, we identified 848 publications. Of these, 12 studies addressed the relationship "plastic particles and amphibians" (7 studies developed in the laboratory and 5 field studies). The scientometric analysis points to geographic concentration of studies in Brazil and China; low investment in research in the area, and limited participation of international authors in the studies carried out. In the systematic approach, we confirm the scarcity of available data on the toxicity of plastic particles in amphibians; we observed a concentration of studies in the Anura order, only one study explored the toxicological effects of NPs and polystyrene and polyethylene are the most studied plastic types. Moreover, the laboratory tested concentrations are distant from those of the environmentally relevant; and little is known about the mechanisms of action of NPs/MPs involved in the identified (eco)toxicological effects. Thus, we strongly recommend more investments in this area, given the ubiquitous nature of NPs/MPs in aquatic environments and their possible consequences on the dynamics, reproduction, and survival of species in the natural environment.
虽然微塑料(MPs)和纳米塑料(NPs)的毒性在不同的营养级中已得到认可,但我们对它们对两栖动物的影响的了解有限。因此,我们根据过去 5 年发表的广泛研究方法,介绍和讨论了涉及两栖动物和塑料颗粒的当前研究状况。为了搜索这些文章,我们查阅了 ISI Web of Science、ScienceDirect 和 Scopus 数据库,使用了与研究主题相关的不同描述符。经过系统搜索,我们确定了 848 篇出版物。其中,有 12 项研究涉及“塑料颗粒与两栖动物”的关系(7 项在实验室开展,5 项为野外研究)。科学计量分析表明,研究集中在巴西和中国;该领域的研究投资较少,国际作者在开展的研究中参与度有限。在系统方法中,我们确认了有关两栖动物塑料颗粒毒性的可用数据稀缺;我们观察到集中在无尾目目中的研究,只有一项研究探讨了 NPs 的毒理学效应,聚苯乙烯和聚乙烯是研究最多的塑料类型。此外,实验室测试的浓度与环境相关的浓度相差甚远;而且,对参与确定的(生态)毒性效应的 NPs/MPs 的作用机制知之甚少。因此,鉴于 NPs/MPs 在水生环境中的普遍存在及其对自然环境中物种动态、繁殖和生存的潜在影响,我们强烈建议在这一领域进行更多投资。