Oulasvirta Jelena, Pirneskoski Jussi, Harve-Rytsälä Heini, Lääperi Mitja, Kuitunen Mikael, Kuisma Markku, Salmi Heli
Division of Anaesthesiology, Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Department of Emergency Medicine and Services, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
BMJ Paediatr Open. 2020 Nov 2;4(1):e000808. doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2020-000808. eCollection 2020.
Children are less vulnerable to serious forms of the COVID-19 disease. However, concerns have been raised about children being the second victims of the pandemic and its control measures. Therefore, we wanted to study if the pandemic, the infection control measures and their consequences to the society projected to paediatric prehospital emergency medical services (EMS) contacts.
We conducted a population-based cohort study concerning all children aged 0-15 years with EMS contacts in the Helsinki University Hospital area during 1 March 2020-31 May 2020 (study period) and equivalent periods in 2017-2019 (control periods). We analysed the demographic characteristics, time of EMS contact, reason for EMS contact, priority of the dispatch, reason for transportation, priority of transportation, if any consultations were made or additional units required, any medication or oxygen or fluids given, if intubation was performed, and whether paramedics took precautions when COVID-19 infection was suspected.
The number of paediatric EMS contacts decreased by 30.4% from mean of 1794 contacts to 1369 (p=0.003). The EMS contacts were more often due to trauma (+23.7%, p<0.05), dispatched in the most urgent category (+139.9%, p=0.001), additional help and the mobile intensive care unit were more frequently requested (+43.3%, p=0.040 and+46.3%, p=0.049, respectively). However, EMS contacts resulted less often in ambulance transport (-21.1%, p<0.001). Alarmingly, there were four deaths during the study period compared with 0-2 during the control periods.
The number of EMS contacts decreased during the pandemic. Nevertheless, the children encountered by the EMS were more seriously ill than during the control periods.
儿童对新冠病毒疾病的严重形式不易感。然而,人们担心儿童会成为疫情及其防控措施的次生受害者。因此,我们想研究疫情、感染防控措施及其对社会的影响是否投射到儿科院前急救医疗服务(EMS)接触情况上。
我们进行了一项基于人群的队列研究,研究对象为2020年3月1日至2020年5月31日(研究期)在赫尔辛基大学医院区域有EMS接触的所有0至15岁儿童,以及2017 - 2019年同期(对照期)。我们分析了人口统计学特征、EMS接触时间、EMS接触原因、调度优先级、转运原因、转运优先级、是否进行了会诊或需要额外单位、是否给予了任何药物、氧气或液体、是否进行了插管,以及医护人员在怀疑新冠病毒感染时是否采取了预防措施。
儿科EMS接触次数从平均1794次减少到1369次,降幅为30.4%(p = 0.003)。EMS接触更常因创伤(增加23.7%,p < 0.05),在最紧急类别中调度(增加139.9%,p = 0.001),更频繁地请求额外帮助和移动重症监护病房(分别增加43.3%,p = 0.040和46.3%,p = 0.049)。然而,EMS接触导致救护车转运的情况减少(减少21.1%,p < 0.001)。令人担忧的是,研究期间有4例死亡,而对照期为0至2例。
疫情期间EMS接触次数减少。然而,与对照期相比,EMS接触到的儿童病情更严重。