Suppr超能文献

西他沙星用于三线根除治疗:一项系统评价

Sitafloxacin for Third-Line Eradication: A Systematic Review.

作者信息

Nishizawa Toshihiro, Munkjargal Munkhbayar, Ebinuma Hirotoshi, Toyoshima Osamu, Suzuki Hidekazu

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, International University of Health and Welfare, Narita Hospital, Narita 286-8520, Japan.

Gastroenterology, Toyoshima Endoscopy Clinic, Tokyo 157-0066, Japan.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2021 Jun 20;10(12):2722. doi: 10.3390/jcm10122722.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Sitafloxacin-based therapy is a potent candidate for third-line eradication treatment. In this systematic review, we summarise current reports with sitafloxacin-based therapy as a third-line treatment.

METHODS

Clinical studies were systematically searched using PubMed, Cochrane library, Web of Science, and the Igaku-Chuo-Zasshi database. We combined data from clinical studies using a random-effects model and calculated pooled event rates, 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and the pooled odds ratio (OR).

RESULTS

We included twelve clinical studies in the present systematic review. The mean eradication rate for 7-day regimens of either PPI (proton pump inhibitor) or vonoprazan-sitafloxacin-amoxicillin was 80.6% (95% CI, 75.2-85.0). The vonoprazan-sitafloxacin-amoxicillin regimen was significantly superior to the PPI-sitafloxacin-amoxicillin regimen (pooled OR of successful eradication: 6.00; 95% CI: 2.25-15.98, < 0.001). The PPI-sitafloxacin-amoxicillin regimen was comparable with PPI-sitafloxacin-metronidazole regimens (pooled OR: 1.06; 95% CI: 0.55-2.07, = 0.86).

CONCLUSIONS

Although the 7-day regimen composed of vonoprazan, sitafloxacin, and amoxicillin is a good option as the third-line eradication treatment in Japan, the extension of treatment duration should be considered to further improve the eradication rate. Considering the safety concern of fluoroquinolones, sitafloxcin should be used after confirming drug susceptibility.

摘要

背景与目的

基于西他沙星的疗法是三线根除治疗的有力候选方案。在本系统评价中,我们总结了目前以基于西他沙星的疗法作为三线治疗的报告。

方法

使用PubMed、Cochrane图书馆、科学网和《医学中央杂志》数据库系统检索临床研究。我们使用随机效应模型合并临床研究数据,并计算合并事件发生率、95%置信区间(CI)和合并比值比(OR)。

结果

本系统评价纳入了12项临床研究。质子泵抑制剂(PPI)或沃克帕唑-西他沙星-阿莫西林7天方案的平均根除率为80.6%(95%CI,75.2 - 85.0)。沃克帕唑-西他沙星-阿莫西林方案显著优于PPI-西他沙星-阿莫西林方案(成功根除的合并OR:6.00;95%CI:2.25 - 15.98,P < 0.001)。PPI-西他沙星-阿莫西林方案与PPI-西他沙星-甲硝唑方案相当(合并OR:1.06;95%CI:0.55 - 2.07,P = 0.86)。

结论

尽管由沃克帕唑、西他沙星和阿莫西林组成的7天方案是日本三线根除治疗的良好选择,但应考虑延长治疗时间以进一步提高根除率。考虑到氟喹诺酮类药物的安全性问题,应在确认药敏后使用西他沙星。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3076/8234224/90afc6bada39/jcm-10-02722-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验