Suppr超能文献

透过全球危机视角审视左右分歧:意识形态差异及其对新冠疫情应对措施的影响

Examining the Left-Right Divide Through the Lens of a Global Crisis: Ideological Differences and Their Implications for Responses to the COVID-19 Pandemic.

作者信息

Ruisch Benjamin Coe, Moore Courtney, Granados Samayoa Javier, Boggs Shelby, Ladanyi Jesse, Fazio Russell

机构信息

The Ohio State University.

出版信息

Polit Psychol. 2021 Oct;42(5):795-816. doi: 10.1111/pops.12740. Epub 2021 May 5.

Abstract

The COVID-19 disease pandemic is one of the most pressing global health issues of our time. Nevertheless, responses to the pandemic exhibit a stark ideological divide, with political conservatives (versus liberals/progressives) expressing less concern about the virus and less behavioral compliance with efforts to combat it. Drawing from decades of research on the psychological underpinnings of ideology, in four studies (total  = 4441) we examine the factors that contribute to the ideological gap in pandemic response-across domains including personality (e.g., empathic concern), attitudes (e.g., trust in science), information (e.g., COVID-19 knowledge), vulnerability (e.g., preexisting medical conditions), demographics (e.g., education, income) and environment (e.g., local COVID-19 infection rates). This work provides insight into the most proximal drivers of this ideological divide and also helps fill a long-standing theoretical and empirical gap regarding how these various ideological differences shape responses to complex real-world sociopolitical events. Among our key findings are the central role of attitude- and belief-related factors (e.g., trust in science and trust in Trump)-and the relatively weaker influence of several domain-general personality factors (empathic concern, disgust sensitivity, conspiratorial ideation). We conclude by considering possible explanations for these findings and their broader implications for our understanding of political ideology.

摘要

新冠疫情是我们这个时代最紧迫的全球健康问题之一。然而,对这一疫情的应对呈现出明显的意识形态分歧,政治保守派(与自由派/进步派相对)对病毒的担忧较少,在抗击疫情的努力中行为上的依从性也较低。基于数十年来对意识形态心理基础的研究,我们通过四项研究(总计4441人)考察了导致疫情应对中意识形态差距的因素,这些因素涵盖多个领域,包括人格(如同情关怀)、态度(如对科学的信任)、信息(如新冠知识)、易感性(如既往病史)、人口统计学特征(如教育程度、收入)以及环境(如当地新冠感染率)。这项工作深入了解了这种意识形态分歧最直接的驱动因素,也有助于填补长期存在的理论和实证空白,即这些不同的意识形态差异如何塑造对复杂现实世界社会政治事件的反应。我们的主要发现包括态度和信念相关因素(如对科学的信任和对特朗普的信任)的核心作用,以及几个一般领域人格因素(同情关怀、厌恶敏感性、阴谋论思维)相对较弱的影响。我们通过思考这些发现的可能解释及其对我们理解政治意识形态的更广泛影响来得出结论。

相似文献

2
Differences in negativity bias underlie variations in political ideology.
Behav Brain Sci. 2014 Jun;37(3):297-307. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X13001192.
3
Sensitive liberals and unfeeling conservatives? .
Politics Life Sci. 2023 Mar;41(2):256-275. doi: 10.1017/pls.2022.18.
4
The politicized pandemic: Ideological polarization and the behavioral response to COVID-19.
Eur Econ Rev. 2023 Jul;156:104472. doi: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2023.104472. Epub 2023 May 11.
6
Political rule (vs. opposition) predicts whether ideological prejudice is stronger in U.S. conservatives or progressives.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2024 Oct;153(10):2454-2469. doi: 10.1037/xge0001643. Epub 2024 Aug 29.
8
Past-focused environmental comparisons promote proenvironmental outcomes for conservatives.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Dec 27;113(52):14953-14957. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1610834113. Epub 2016 Dec 12.
9
Toward a Developmental Science of Politics.
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2019 Sep;84(3):7-185. doi: 10.1111/mono.12410.
10

引用本文的文献

1
Political identity and risk politics: Evidence from a pandemic.
Risk Anal. 2024 Oct 14. doi: 10.1111/risa.17654.
2
Scenario-Based Messages on Social Media Motivate COVID-19 Information Seeking.
J Appl Res Mem Cogn. 2024 Mar;13(1):124-135. doi: 10.1037/mac0000114. Epub 2023 Apr 27.
3
Mindware: Critical Thinking in Everyday Life.
J Intell. 2024 Feb 2;12(2):17. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence12020017.
4
General Population's Psychological Perceptions of COVID-19: A Systematic Review.
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2023 Dec 11;16:4995-5009. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S440942. eCollection 2023.
7
How Trust in Cancer Information Has Changed in the Era of COVID-19: Patterns by Race and Ethnicity.
J Health Commun. 2023 Mar 4;28(3):131-143. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2022.2117439. Epub 2023 Mar 16.
9
Taking a Shot: The Impact of Information Frames and Channels on Vaccination Willingness in a Pandemic.
Vaccines (Basel). 2023 Jan 6;11(1):137. doi: 10.3390/vaccines11010137.
10
Political attitude change over time following COVID-19 lockdown: Rallying effects and differences between left and right voters.
Front Psychol. 2022 Dec 15;13:1041957. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1041957. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

3
Social distancing decreases an individual's likelihood of contracting COVID-19.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Feb 23;118(8). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2023131118.
4
The Emotional Path to Action: Empathy Promotes Physical Distancing and Wearing of Face Masks During the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Psychol Sci. 2020 Nov;31(11):1363-1373. doi: 10.1177/0956797620964422. Epub 2020 Sep 29.
5
Elusive consensus: Polarization in elite communication on the COVID-19 pandemic.
Sci Adv. 2020 Jul 10;6(28):eabc2717. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abc2717. eCollection 2020 Jul.
6
A matter of taste: Gustatory sensitivity predicts political ideology.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2021 Aug;121(2):394-409. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000365. Epub 2020 Sep 3.
7
Disease avoidance in the time of COVID-19: The behavioral immune system is associated with concern and preventative health behaviors.
PLoS One. 2020 Aug 20;15(8):e0238015. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238015. eCollection 2020.
8
The confident conservative: Ideological differences in judgment and decision-making confidence.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2021 Mar;150(3):527-544. doi: 10.1037/xge0000898. Epub 2020 Aug 13.
9
Conservatives and liberals have similar physiological responses to threats.
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Jun;4(6):613-621. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-0823-z. Epub 2020 Feb 10.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验