Ruisch Benjamin Coe, Moore Courtney, Granados Samayoa Javier, Boggs Shelby, Ladanyi Jesse, Fazio Russell
The Ohio State University.
Polit Psychol. 2021 Oct;42(5):795-816. doi: 10.1111/pops.12740. Epub 2021 May 5.
The COVID-19 disease pandemic is one of the most pressing global health issues of our time. Nevertheless, responses to the pandemic exhibit a stark ideological divide, with political conservatives (versus liberals/progressives) expressing less concern about the virus and less behavioral compliance with efforts to combat it. Drawing from decades of research on the psychological underpinnings of ideology, in four studies (total = 4441) we examine the factors that contribute to the ideological gap in pandemic response-across domains including personality (e.g., empathic concern), attitudes (e.g., trust in science), information (e.g., COVID-19 knowledge), vulnerability (e.g., preexisting medical conditions), demographics (e.g., education, income) and environment (e.g., local COVID-19 infection rates). This work provides insight into the most proximal drivers of this ideological divide and also helps fill a long-standing theoretical and empirical gap regarding how these various ideological differences shape responses to complex real-world sociopolitical events. Among our key findings are the central role of attitude- and belief-related factors (e.g., trust in science and trust in Trump)-and the relatively weaker influence of several domain-general personality factors (empathic concern, disgust sensitivity, conspiratorial ideation). We conclude by considering possible explanations for these findings and their broader implications for our understanding of political ideology.
新冠疫情是我们这个时代最紧迫的全球健康问题之一。然而,对这一疫情的应对呈现出明显的意识形态分歧,政治保守派(与自由派/进步派相对)对病毒的担忧较少,在抗击疫情的努力中行为上的依从性也较低。基于数十年来对意识形态心理基础的研究,我们通过四项研究(总计4441人)考察了导致疫情应对中意识形态差距的因素,这些因素涵盖多个领域,包括人格(如同情关怀)、态度(如对科学的信任)、信息(如新冠知识)、易感性(如既往病史)、人口统计学特征(如教育程度、收入)以及环境(如当地新冠感染率)。这项工作深入了解了这种意识形态分歧最直接的驱动因素,也有助于填补长期存在的理论和实证空白,即这些不同的意识形态差异如何塑造对复杂现实世界社会政治事件的反应。我们的主要发现包括态度和信念相关因素(如对科学的信任和对特朗普的信任)的核心作用,以及几个一般领域人格因素(同情关怀、厌恶敏感性、阴谋论思维)相对较弱的影响。我们通过思考这些发现的可能解释及其对我们理解政治意识形态的更广泛影响来得出结论。