Division of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, UH Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital, Cleveland, OH.
Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2022 Jan 1;23(1):e45-e54. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000002808.
To derive and internally validate a bronchiolitis-specific illness severity score (the Critical Bronchiolitis Score) that out-performs mortality-based illness severity scores (e.g., Pediatric Risk of Mortality) in measuring expected duration of respiratory support and PICU length of stay for critically ill children with bronchiolitis.
Retrospective database study using the Virtual Pediatric Systems (VPS, LLC; Los Angeles, CA) database.
One-hundred twenty-eight North-American PICUs.
Fourteen-thousand four-hundred seven children less than 2 years old admitted to a contributing PICU with primary diagnosis of bronchiolitis and use of ICU-level respiratory support (defined as high-flow nasal cannula, noninvasive ventilation, invasive mechanical ventilation, or negative pressure ventilation) at 12 hours after PICU admission.
Patient-level variables available at 12 hours from PICU admission, duration of ICU-level respiratory support, and PICU length of stay data were extracted for analysis. After randomly dividing the cohort into derivation and validation groups, patient-level variables that were significantly associated with the study outcomes were selected in a stepwise backward fashion for inclusion in the final score. Score performance in the validation cohort was assessed using root mean squared error and mean absolute error, and performance was compared with that of existing PICU illness severity scores.
Twelve commonly available patient-level variables were included in the Critical Bronchiolitis Score. Outcomes calculated with the score were similar to actual outcomes in the validation cohort. The Critical Bronchiolitis Score demonstrated a statistically significantly stronger association with duration of ICU-level respiratory support and PICU length of stay than mortality-based scores as measured by root mean squared error and mean absolute error.
The Critical Bronchiolitis Score performed better than PICU mortality-based scores in measuring expected duration of ICU-level respiratory support and ICU length of stay. This score may have utility to enrich interventional trials and adjust for illness severity in observational studies in this very common PICU condition.
制定并内部验证一种专用于细支气管炎的疾病严重程度评分(即严重细支气管炎评分),该评分在测量危重症细支气管炎患儿预期的呼吸支持时间和 PICU 住院时间方面优于基于死亡率的疾病严重程度评分(如儿科死亡率风险评分)。
使用虚拟儿科系统(VPS,LLC;洛杉矶,加利福尼亚州)数据库进行回顾性数据库研究。
北美 128 家 PICU。
14407 名年龄小于 2 岁的患儿,这些患儿在 PICU 入住 12 小时后被诊断为患有细支气管炎且需要 ICU 级别的呼吸支持(定义为高流量鼻导管、无创通气、有创机械通气或负压通气),并入住了参与研究的 PICU。
从 PICU 入住 12 小时后提取患者水平的变量、ICU 级别的呼吸支持持续时间和 PICU 住院时间数据进行分析。在将队列随机分为推导组和验证组后,采用逐步向后的方式选择与研究结局显著相关的患者水平变量,以纳入最终评分。在验证组中评估评分的表现,使用均方根误差和平均绝对误差,并将其与现有的 PICU 疾病严重程度评分进行比较。
严重细支气管炎评分纳入了 12 个常见的患者水平变量。在验证组中,评分计算的结局与实际结局相似。与死亡率为基础的评分相比,严重细支气管炎评分与 ICU 级别的呼吸支持持续时间和 PICU 住院时间的相关性更强,这一结果通过均方根误差和平均绝对误差得到证实。
严重细支气管炎评分在测量 ICU 级别的呼吸支持和 PICU 住院时间的预期时间方面优于基于 PICU 死亡率的评分。在这种非常常见的 PICU 情况下,该评分可能对丰富干预试验和调整观察性研究中的疾病严重程度有一定作用。