Suppr超能文献

芬太尼与吗啡在成年癌症患者中的疗效和安全性比较:一项荟萃分析。

Efficacy and Safety of Fentanyl Compared With Morphine among Adult Patients with Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Manirakiza Astère, Irakoze Laurent, Manirakiza Sébastien, Bizimana Prudence

机构信息

Kamenge University Hospital.

Karuzi Fiftieth Hospital.

出版信息

East Afr Health Res J. 2020;4(1):8-16. doi: 10.24248/eahrj.v4i1.617. Epub 2020 Jun 26.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cancer pain is experienced by numerous patients; thus, the main pain-relieving opioid analgesics, fentanyl and morphine, are of great importance. However, their analgesic efficacy and safety are different among individuals and are still controversial. The aim of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of fentanyl and morphine among patients with cancer.

METHODS

We performed a meta-analysis by searching PubMed and the Cochrane Library up to 01 April 2019. The search terms were fentanyl, morphine, opioids and cancer pain. All randomised controlled trials comparing fentanyl and morphine were included in the analysis.

RESULTS

Overall, the initial search identified 2970 published studies; among them, 9 studies were included in the efficacy analysis and 8 studies were included in the safety analysis. The oral morphine versus oral transmucosal fentanyl subgroup analysis showed a mean difference(MD)=0.47[Confidence interval(CI):0.35-0.58] with an overall effect, Z=8.10, P<.00001. The outcome of the oral morphine versus nasal/transdermal fentanyl subgroup indicated a MD=0.20[CI:0.3-0.37] with an overall effect, Z=2.24 and P=.02.For the oral morphine versus buccal/sublingual fentanyl subgroup, the analysis revealed a MD=1.80[CI:1.35-2.25] with an overall effect, Z=7.87 and P<.00001.The oral morphine versus other forms of fentanyl subgroup showed a MD=0.70[95%CI:0.34-1.06] with the test for the overall effect, Z=3.81 and P=.0001.Constipation, drowsiness, confusion and dry mouth were more common in the morphine group than in the fentanyl group, with a risk ratio=0.60[CI:0.37-0.97]; 0.93[CI:0.69-1.25]; 0.85[CI:0.23-3.13] and 0.54[CI:0.05-6.43], respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with oral morphine, fentanyl is safer and more effective. Moreover, fentanyl presents fewer side effects than morphine, especially constipation, drowsiness, confusion and dry mouth.

摘要

背景

众多癌症患者都经历过癌痛;因此,主要的缓解疼痛的阿片类镇痛药芬太尼和吗啡非常重要。然而,它们的镇痛效果和安全性在个体之间存在差异,且仍存在争议。本研究的目的是比较芬太尼和吗啡在癌症患者中的安全性和有效性。

方法

我们通过检索截至2019年4月1日的PubMed和Cochrane图书馆进行了一项荟萃分析。检索词为芬太尼、吗啡、阿片类药物和癌痛。所有比较芬太尼和吗啡的随机对照试验均纳入分析。

结果

总体而言,初步检索共识别出2970项已发表研究;其中,9项研究纳入疗效分析,8项研究纳入安全性分析。口服吗啡与口服黏膜芬太尼亚组分析显示平均差(MD)=0.47[置信区间(CI):0.35 - 0.58],总体效应Z = 8.10,P <.00001。口服吗啡与鼻用/透皮芬太尼亚组的结果显示MD = 0.20[CI:0.3 - 0.37],总体效应Z = 2.24,P =.02。对于口服吗啡与颊部/舌下芬太尼亚组,分析显示MD = 1.80[CI:1.35 - 2.25],总体效应Z = 7.87,P <.00001。口服吗啡与其他形式芬太尼亚组显示MD = 0.70[95%CI:0.34 - 1.06],总体效应检验Z = 3.81,P =.0001。便秘、嗜睡、意识模糊和口干在吗啡组比芬太尼组更常见,风险比分别为0.60[CI:0.37 - 0.97];0.93[CI:0.69 - 1.25];0.85[CI:0.23 - 3.13]和0.54[CI:0.05 - 6.43]。

结论

与口服吗啡相比,芬太尼更安全、更有效。此外,芬太尼的副作用比吗啡少,尤其是便秘、嗜睡、意识模糊和口干。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/24d5/8279272/585cc529c9b5/EAHRJ-4-1-8-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验