Division of Cardiovascular, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Department of Trial Design and Development, Baim Institute for Clinical Research, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
J Med Virol. 2021 Dec;93(12):6737-6749. doi: 10.1002/jmv.27259. Epub 2021 Aug 17.
Chloroquine or its derivative hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) combined with or without azithromycin (AZ) have been widely investigated in observational studies as a treatment option for coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) infection. The network meta-analysis aims to summarize evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to determine if AZ or HCQ is associated with improved clinical outcomes. PubMed and Embase were searched from inception to March 7, 2021. We included published RCTs that investigated the efficacy of AZ, HCQ, or its combination among hospitalized patients with COVID-19 infection. The outcomes of interest were all-cause mortality and the use of mechanical ventilation. The pooled odds ratio was calculated using a random-effect model. A total of 10 RCTs were analyzed. Participant's mean age ranged from 40.4 to 66.5 years. There was no significant effect on mortality associated with AZ plus HCQ (odds ratio [OR] = 0.562 [95% confidence interval {CI}: 0.168-1.887]), AZ alone (OR = 0.965 [95% CI: 0.865-1.077]), or HCQ alone (OR = 1.122 [95% CI: 0.995-1.266]; p = 0.06). Similarly, based on pooled effect sizes derived from direct and indirect evidence, none of the treatments had a significant benefit in decreasing the use of mechanical ventilation. No heterogeneity was identified (Cochran's Q = 1.68; p = 0.95; τ = 0; I = 0% [95% CI: 0%-0%]). Evidence from RCTs suggests that AZ with or without HCQ was not associated with a significant effect on the mortality or mechanical ventilation rates in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. More research is needed to explore therapeutics agents that can effectively reduce the mortality or severity of COVID-19.
氯喹或其衍生物羟氯喹(HCQ)联合或不联合阿奇霉素(AZ)已在观察性研究中广泛研究,作为治疗 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)感染的一种选择。本网络荟萃分析旨在汇总随机对照试验(RCT)的证据,以确定 AZ 或 HCQ 是否与改善临床结局相关。检索了从建库到 2021 年 3 月 7 日的 PubMed 和 Embase 数据库。我们纳入了研究 COVID-19 住院患者中 AZ、HCQ 或其联合治疗疗效的已发表 RCT。主要结局是全因死亡率和机械通气的使用。使用随机效应模型计算汇总优势比。共分析了 10 项 RCT。参与者的平均年龄为 40.4-66.5 岁。AZ 加 HCQ(比值比 [OR] = 0.562 [95%置信区间 {CI}:0.168-1.887])、AZ 单药(OR = 0.965 [95% CI:0.865-1.077])或 HCQ 单药(OR = 1.122 [95% CI:0.995-1.266])与死亡率均无显著相关性(p = 0.06)。同样,根据直接和间接证据得出的汇总效应量,这些治疗方法在降低机械通气使用率方面均无显著获益。未发现异质性(Cochran's Q = 1.68;p = 0.95;τ = 0;I = 0% [95% CI:0%-0%])。RCT 证据表明,AZ 联合或不联合 HCQ 对 COVID-19 住院患者的死亡率或机械通气率没有显著影响。需要更多的研究来探索能够有效降低 COVID-19 死亡率或严重程度的治疗药物。