Suppr超能文献

慢性疼痛患者抑郁症状的干预措施:荟萃分析的系统评价。

Interventions for Depressive Symptoms in People Living with Chronic Pain: A Systematic Review of Meta-Analyses.

机构信息

Bridgepoint Collaboratory for Research and Innovation, Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health, Canada.

Department of Psychiatry, Western University, Canada.

出版信息

Pain Med. 2022 May 4;23(5):934-954. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnab248.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This review investigated the effectiveness of clinical interventions on depressive symptoms in people with all types of chronic pain.

METHODS

We searched seven electronic databases and reference lists on September 15, 2020, and included English-language, systematic reviews and meta-analyses of trials that examined the effects of clinical interventions on depressive outcomes in chronic pain. Two independent reviewers screened, extracted, and assessed the risk of bias. PROSPERO registration: CRD42019131871.

RESULTS

Eighty-three reviews were selected and included 182 meta-analyses. Data were summarized visually and narratively using standardized mean differences with 95% confidence intervals as the primary outcome of interest. A large proportion of meta-analyses investigated fibromyalgia or mixed chronic pain, and psychological interventions were most commonly evaluated. Acceptance and commitment therapy for general chronic pain, and fluoxetine and web-based psychotherapy for fibromyalgia showed the most robust effects and can be prioritized for implementation in clinical practice. Exercise for arthritis, pharmacotherapy for neuropathic pain, self-regulatory psychotherapy for axial pain, and music therapy for general chronic pain showed large, significant effects, but estimates were derived from low- or critically low-quality reviews.

CONCLUSIONS

No single intervention type demonstrated substantial superiority across multiple pain populations. Other dimensions beyond efficacy, such as accessibility, safety, cost, patient preference, and efficacy for non-depressive outcomes should also be weighed when considering treatment options. Further effectiveness research is required for common pain types such as arthritis and axial pain, and common interventions such as opioids, anti-inflammatories and acupuncture.

摘要

目的

本综述调查了各种类型慢性疼痛患者的临床干预对抑郁症状的有效性。

方法

我们于 2020 年 9 月 15 日检索了 7 个电子数据库和参考文献列表,并纳入了英语、系统评价和荟萃分析,这些研究检查了临床干预对慢性疼痛患者抑郁结局的影响。两名独立的审查员对筛选、提取和偏倚风险进行评估。PROSPERO 注册号:CRD42019131871。

结果

共筛选出 83 篇综述,其中包括 182 项荟萃分析。使用标准化均数差(95%置信区间)作为主要感兴趣的结局,通过视觉和叙述性方法总结数据。大多数荟萃分析调查了纤维肌痛或混合性慢性疼痛,最常评估的是心理干预。一般慢性疼痛的接受和承诺疗法,以及纤维肌痛的氟西汀和基于网络的心理疗法显示出最显著的效果,可优先在临床实践中实施。关节炎的运动疗法、神经病理性疼痛的药物治疗、轴向疼痛的自我调节心理疗法和一般慢性疼痛的音乐疗法显示出较大的显著效果,但这些估计值来自低质量或极低级别的综述。

结论

没有一种干预类型在多种疼痛人群中都具有显著优势。在考虑治疗方案时,除了疗效之外,还应权衡其他维度,如可及性、安全性、成本、患者偏好以及对非抑郁结局的疗效。对于常见的疼痛类型,如关节炎和轴向疼痛,以及常见的干预措施,如阿片类药物、抗炎药和针灸,还需要进一步的有效性研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d73c/9071227/425ac221db28/pnab248f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验