Burke Robert E, Xu Yao, Ritter Ashley Z, Werner Rachel M
Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Corporal Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Division of General Internal Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Health Serv Res. 2022 Jun;57(3):497-504. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13855. Epub 2021 Aug 12.
To compare the outcomes of postacute care between home health (HH) and skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) following hospitalization among Medicare beneficiaries with a diagnosis of dementia.
100% MedPAR data, Minimum Data Set, and Outcome and Assessment Information Set assessment data from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2016.
Retrospective cohort analysis using an instrumental variable design to compare outcomes (30-day readmission and mortality, 100-day mortality) of HH versus SNF following acute hospitalization. We used the differential distance between patients' home and the closest HH agency and SNF to instrument for nonrandom allocation of patients.
DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: We identified hospital discharges followed by SNF and HH stays for Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries with dementia. We excluded beneficiaries younger than age 65, admitted to the hospital from a nursing home, or enrolled in hospice. We identified dementia using validated diagnostic codes with a 3-year look-back.
Our sample included 977,946 beneficiaries with a diagnosis of dementia; 297,732 (30.4%) received HH, while 680,214 (69.6%) went to SNF. Overall, 16.8% were readmitted to the hospital and 6.1% died within 30 days, while 15.4% died within 100 days of hospital discharge. In the instrumental variable analysis, there were no differences in any outcome between the two postacute care settings.
Medicare beneficiaries with a diagnosis of dementia receiving postacute care in HH or SNF experienced similar rates of readmission and mortality across settings. This finding raises important questions about current postacute care referral patterns, given 7 in 10 patients with a diagnosis of dementia in our sample were discharged to SNF.
比较诊断为痴呆症的医疗保险受益人群住院后接受家庭健康护理(HH)和专业护理机构(SNF)护理的急性后期护理结果。
2015年1月1日至2016年12月31日的100%医疗住院病人分析报告数据、最低数据集以及结果与评估信息集评估数据。
采用工具变量设计进行回顾性队列分析,以比较急性住院后HH与SNF的护理结果(30天再入院率和死亡率、100天死亡率)。我们使用患者住所与最近的HH机构和SNF之间的差异距离作为患者非随机分配的工具变量。
数据收集/提取方法:我们确定了医疗保险按服务收费受益人群中,住院后接受SNF和HH护理的出院情况。我们排除了年龄小于65岁、从疗养院入院或参加临终关怀的受益人。我们使用经过验证的诊断代码并回顾3年病史来确定痴呆症。
我们的样本包括977,946名诊断为痴呆症的受益人;297,732名(30.4%)接受HH护理,而680,214名(69.6%)前往SNF。总体而言,16.8%的患者在30天内再次入院,6.1%在30天内死亡,15.4%在出院100天内死亡。在工具变量分析中,两种急性后期护理环境下的任何结果均无差异。
诊断为痴呆症的医疗保险受益人在HH或SNF接受急性后期护理时,不同护理环境下的再入院率和死亡率相似。鉴于我们样本中十分之七诊断为痴呆症的患者被送往SNF,这一发现对当前急性后期护理转诊模式提出了重要问题。