Suppr超能文献

比较不同黏菌素方案治疗多重耐药微生物引起肺炎的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Comparison of different colistin regimens for the treatment of pneumonia caused by multidrug-resistant microorganisms: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Hospital Infection Management, Huzhou Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital Affiliated to Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Zhejiang Province, P.R. China.

出版信息

Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2021 Aug;25(16):5275-5292. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202108_26549.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Multidrug-resistant pneumonia is a common cause of hospital-related morbidity and mortality across the world. The high prevalence of multidrug-resistant pneumonia due to resistant gram-negative pathogens has led to a re-introduction of colistin. The adverse events associated with intravenous colistin can be alleviated by administering the drug nasally (i.e., inhalation) or in a combination including both inhalation and intravenous presentations of the drug. A review study compared the impact of these administration methods on clinical, morbidity, and mortality-related outcomes in patients with multiple-drug resistant pneumonia. However, the publication of newer cohort trials, warrants an update of the state of the evidence. To compare the clinical, morbidity, and mortality outcomes in patients with multidrug-resistant pneumonia receiving either intravenous colistin or combined drug presentations (ie, inhaled and intravenous).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic search of the academic literature was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines across five databases (Web of Science, EMBASE, CENTRAL, Scopus, and MEDLINE). We conducted a random-effect meta-analysis to compare outcomes such as rate of clinical cure, microbiological eradication, nephrotoxicity, and overall mortality in patients with multidrug-resistant pneumonia receiving either intravenous colistin, inhaled colistin, or a combination of those administration routes.

RESULTS

From 963 studies, we found 16 eligible studies with 1651 patients (61.6 ± 7.7 years) with multidrug-resistant pneumonia who had received either intravenous, inhaled colistin or a combined inhaled/intravenous administration. Our meta-analysis revealed higher rates of clinical cure (OR, 1.61) and microbiological eradication (1.37) in patients receiving combined intravenous/inhaled colistin than in those receiving intravenous colistin alone. Additional analyses revealed higher rates of nephrotoxicity (1.30) and mortality (1.44) in patients receiving intravenous colistin than in those receiving combined intravenous/inhaled colistin.

CONCLUSIONS

We provide evidence showing improved clinical, morbidity, and mortality outcomes in patients with multidrug-resistant pneumonia receiving inhaled colistin or combined inhaled/intravenous colistin than those receiving intravenous colistin alone. These findings should help clinicians stratify the risks associated with different colistin administration routes to manage multidrug-resistant pneumonia.

摘要

目的

多药耐药性肺炎是全球范围内导致医院相关发病率和死亡率的常见原因。由于耐药革兰氏阴性病原体引起的多药耐药性肺炎的高患病率,导致了粘菌素的重新引入。静脉内粘菌素相关的不良反应可以通过鼻内给药(即吸入)或同时使用吸入和静脉内药物制剂来缓解。一项综述研究比较了这些给药方法对患有多重耐药性肺炎的患者的临床、发病率和死亡率相关结局的影响。然而,由于较新的队列试验的发表,需要更新证据状况。比较接受静脉内粘菌素或联合药物制剂(即吸入和静脉内)的多重耐药性肺炎患者的临床、发病率和死亡率结局。

材料和方法

根据 PRISMA 指南,我们在五个数据库(Web of Science、EMBASE、CENTRAL、Scopus 和 MEDLINE)中进行了系统的文献检索。我们进行了随机效应荟萃分析,以比较接受静脉内粘菌素、吸入粘菌素或联合给药途径的多重耐药性肺炎患者的临床治愈率、微生物学清除率、肾毒性和总死亡率等结局。

结果

从 963 项研究中,我们发现了 16 项符合条件的研究,共有 1651 名患有多重耐药性肺炎的患者(61.6±7.7 岁)接受了静脉内、吸入粘菌素或联合吸入/静脉内给药。我们的荟萃分析显示,接受联合静脉内/吸入粘菌素治疗的患者的临床治愈率(OR,1.61)和微生物学清除率(1.37)更高。进一步分析显示,接受静脉内粘菌素治疗的患者的肾毒性(1.30)和死亡率(1.44)更高。

结论

我们提供的证据表明,接受吸入粘菌素或联合吸入/静脉内粘菌素治疗的多重耐药性肺炎患者的临床、发病率和死亡率结局优于单独接受静脉内粘菌素治疗的患者。这些发现有助于临床医生对不同粘菌素给药途径相关风险进行分层,以管理多重耐药性肺炎。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验