Abrão Fernando C, Araujo de França Sabrina, de Abreu Igor R L B, das Neves Pereira João Carlos, Del Massa Emílio C, Oliver Andréa, Cavalcante Maria Gabriela C
Thoracic Surgery Department, Hospital Santa Marcelina, São Paulo, Brazil.
Thoracic Department, Hospital Alemão Oswaldo Cruz, São Paulo, Brazil.
J Thorac Dis. 2021 Sep;13(9):5439-5447. doi: 10.21037/jtd-21-920.
In Low-Middle Income Countries (LMICs), resource optimization and infrastructure availability are recurrently in debate. In order to assist the development and implementation of guidelines, LMICs often exemplify from High-Income Countries protocols. At the final, it will be: content adaption is often needed. In this study, we demonstrated the preliminary analysis of the Brazilian experience by adapting the ERAS Protocol for thoracic surgery patients (PROSM).
Patients' data were extracted from the surgical group database that operated in the city of Sao Paulo. Patients' data were organized for analysis after the institution's ethics committee gave their approval. Patients' variables were analyzed and compared to a control group. Subgroup analysis included patients without ICU Admission.
PROSM patients had reduced ICU length of stay (LOS) (Mean of 0.3±0.58 days, 1.2±1.65 days, P=0.001), Hospital LOS (Mean of 1.6±1.32 days, 3.9±3.25 days, P=0.001) and Chest Drain duration (Median 1.0±1.00 days, 3.0±3.00 days, P=0.001). Analyses of patients that were not admitted to the ICU demonstrated reduced Hospital LOS and Chest drain duration. Cost analysis, such as procedure, daily, and post-surgical costs were also significantly lower towards PROSM group.
This study revealed important aspects for improvement of the delivered care quality and opportunity for expenditure management. We expect to assist more countries to improve knowledge under the implementation of enhanced protocols.
在中低收入国家(LMICs),资源优化和基础设施可用性一直是争论的焦点。为了协助指南的制定和实施,中低收入国家经常借鉴高收入国家的方案。最终,往往需要进行内容调整。在本研究中,我们通过调整胸外科患者的加速康复外科方案(PROSM)展示了对巴西经验的初步分析。
患者数据从在圣保罗市开展手术的外科组数据库中提取。在机构伦理委员会批准后,对患者数据进行整理以进行分析。分析患者变量并与对照组进行比较。亚组分析包括未入住重症监护病房(ICU)的患者。
PROSM组患者的ICU住院时间(LOS)缩短(平均0.3±0.58天,1.2±1.65天,P = 0.001),医院住院时间(平均1.6±1.32天,3.9±3.25天,P = 0.001)以及胸腔引流持续时间缩短(中位数1.0±1.00天,3.0±3.00天,P = 0.001)。对未入住ICU的患者分析显示,医院住院时间和胸腔引流持续时间缩短。成本分析,如手术、每日和术后成本,PROSM组也显著更低。
本研究揭示了改善所提供护理质量的重要方面以及支出管理的机会。我们期望协助更多国家在实施强化方案方面提高认识。