School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada.
School of Labour Studies, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4M4, Canada.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 10;18(22):11794. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182211794.
This study aimed to investigate differences in work disability duration among immigrants (categorized as economic, family member or refugee/other classification upon arrival to Canada) compared to Canadian-born workers with a work-related injury in British Columbia. Immigrants and Canadian-born workers were identified from linked immigration records with workers' compensation claims for work-related back strain, connective tissue, concussion and fracture injuries requiring at least one paid day of work disability benefits between 2009 to 2015. Quantile regression investigated the relationship between immigration classification and predicted work disability days (defined from injury date to end of compensation claim, up to 365 days) and modeled at the 25th, 50th and 75th percentile of the distribution of the disability days. With a few exceptions, immigrants experienced greater predicted disability days compared to Canadian-born workers within the same injury cohort. The largest differences were observed for family and refugee/other immigrant classification workers, and, in particular, for women within these classifications, compared to Canadian-born workers. For example, at the 50th percentile of the distribution of disability days, we observed a difference of 34.1 days longer for refugee/other women in the concussion cohort and a difference of 27.5 days longer for family classification women in the fracture cohort. Economic immigrants had comparable disability days with Canadian-born workers, especially at the 25th and 50th percentiles of the distribution. Immigrant workers' longer disability durations may be a result of more severe injuries or challenges navigating the workers' compensation system with delays in seeking disability benefits and rehabilitation services. Differences by immigrant classification speak to vulnerabilities or inequities upon arrival in Canada that persist after entry to the workforce and warrant further investigation for early mitigation strategies.
本研究旨在调查不列颠哥伦比亚省因工作相关损伤而导致工作残疾的移民(按抵达加拿大时的经济、家庭成员或难民/其他分类)与加拿大出生的工人之间工作残疾持续时间的差异。从移民记录与工人赔偿索赔相关联中确定了移民和加拿大出生的工人,这些索赔是由于工作相关的背部劳损、结缔组织、脑震荡和骨折受伤而提出的,这些受伤需要至少一天的带薪工作残疾福利,时间在 2009 年至 2015 年之间。分位数回归调查了移民分类与预测工作残疾天数(从受伤日期到赔偿索赔结束,最多 365 天)之间的关系,并对残疾天数分布的第 25、50 和 75 百分位数进行了建模。除了少数例外,在相同的损伤队列中,移民经历的预测残疾天数比加拿大出生的工人更多。在家庭和难民/其他移民分类工人中观察到最大的差异,特别是在这些分类中的女性,与加拿大出生的工人相比。例如,在残疾天数分布的第 50 百分位数,我们观察到脑震荡队列中难民/其他女性的残疾天数长 34.1 天,骨折队列中家庭分类女性的残疾天数长 27.5 天。经济移民与加拿大出生的工人的残疾天数相当,尤其是在残疾天数分布的第 25 和 50 百分位数。移民工人的残疾持续时间较长可能是由于受伤更严重,或者在寻求残疾福利和康复服务时,由于延迟而在工人赔偿系统中遇到困难。移民分类的差异反映了移民抵达加拿大时的脆弱性或不平等,这种情况在进入劳动力市场后仍然存在,需要进一步调查,以制定早期缓解策略。