Suppr超能文献

使用临床样本评估Biomeme Franklin™ three9实时荧光定量PCR仪和新冠病毒快速检测试纸的灵敏度和特异性。

Evaluating sensitivity and specificity of the Biomeme Franklin™ three9 real-time PCR device and SARS-CoV-2 go-strips assay using clinical samples.

作者信息

Voelker Chet R, Ochoa Anna R, Armstrong-Spenrath La'Quita, Lott Lisa, McDaniel Jennifer S, Blackburn August N, Cornell Lauren E, Mahoney Rachel, Asin Susana N

机构信息

Center for Advanced Molecular Detection, 59 Medical Wing, US Air Force, JBSA-Lackland, San Antonio, TX, United States.

Center for Advanced Molecular Detection, 59 Medical Wing, US Air Force, JBSA-Lackland, San Antonio, TX, United States; General Dynamics Information Technology, Falls Church, VA, United States.

出版信息

J Clin Virol. 2022 Jan;146:105046. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2021.105046. Epub 2021 Nov 25.

Abstract

We evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of the Biomeme Franklin™ three9 Real-Time PCR Thermocycler and Biomeme SARS-CoV-2 Go-Strips in the detection of SARS-CoV-2. The Biomeme Franklin™ three9 platform is a portable, battery-operated system that could be used in remote settings. We assessed performance of the Biomeme SARS-CoV-2 detection system at a wide range of viral concentrations, examined cross-reactivity of the SARS-CoV-2 Go-Strips against several near-neighbor respiratory pathogens, and evaluated agreement against the BioFire® Respiratory Panel 2.1 in four clinical sample types. Our data indicate the Biomeme Go-Strips can reliably detect SARS-CoV-2 at a concentration of 4.2 × 10 copies/mL. No cross reactivity of the Go-Strips targets was detected against any of the tested near-neighbor respiratory pathogens. Cohen's kappa statistics ranged from 0.68 to 0.92 between results from the Biomeme SARS-CoV-2 Go-Strips and the BioFire® Respiratory Panel 2.1 in all the different sample types. Compared to the BioFire® Respiratory Panel 2.1, the Biomeme SARS-CoV-2 Go-Strips demonstrated statistically significantly lower sensitivity in 3 out of 5 sample types. Overall, our study demonstrates the Biomeme Franklin™ three9 used with the SARS-CoV-2 Go-Strips is an effective system for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 that could potentially be used in a remote or austere environment.

摘要

我们评估了Biomeme Franklin™ three9实时荧光定量PCR仪和Biomeme SARS-CoV-2检测试纸条在检测严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)方面的敏感性和特异性。Biomeme Franklin™ three9平台是一个便携式、电池供电的系统,可用于偏远地区。我们在广泛的病毒浓度范围内评估了Biomeme SARS-CoV-2检测系统的性能,检测了SARS-CoV-2检测试纸条对几种相近呼吸道病原体的交叉反应性,并在四种临床样本类型中评估了其与BioFire® 呼吸病原体鉴定2.1 Panel检测结果的一致性。我们的数据表明,Biomeme检测试纸条能够可靠地检测浓度为4.2×10拷贝/毫升的SARS-CoV-2。未检测到检测试纸条的靶标与任何测试的相近呼吸道病原体之间存在交叉反应。在所有不同样本类型中,Biomeme SARS-CoV-2检测试纸条与BioFire® 呼吸病原体鉴定2.1 Panel结果之间的Cohen's kappa统计值范围为0.68至0.92。与BioFire® 呼吸病原体鉴定2.1 Panel相比,Biomeme SARS-CoV-2检测试纸条在5种样本类型中的3种中表现出统计学上显著较低的敏感性。总体而言,我们的研究表明,与SARS-CoV-2检测试纸条一起使用的Biomeme Franklin™ three9是一种有效的SARS-CoV-2检测系统,有可能用于偏远或艰苦环境。

相似文献

4
Portable RT-PCR System: a Rapid and Scalable Diagnostic Tool for COVID-19 Testing.
J Clin Microbiol. 2021 Apr 20;59(5). doi: 10.1128/JCM.03004-20.
5
Comparison of eleven in vitro diagnostic assays for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA.
J Virol Methods. 2021 Sep;295:114200. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2021.114200. Epub 2021 Jun 1.
6
Clinical evaluation of the BioFire® Respiratory Panel 2.1 and detection of SARS-CoV-2.
J Clin Virol. 2020 Aug;129:104538. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104538. Epub 2020 Jul 6.
8
Saliva as a testing specimen with or without pooling for SARS-CoV-2 detection by multiplex RT-PCR test.
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 23;16(2):e0243183. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243183. eCollection 2021.
10
Syndromic approach to SARS-CoV-2 detection using QIAstat-Dx SARS-CoV-2 panel from clinical samples.
J Virol Methods. 2021 Dec;298:114300. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2021.114300. Epub 2021 Sep 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Rapid Equipment-Free Nucleic Acid Extraction Using a Silica-Based Pipet Tip Column.
ACS Omega. 2025 May 15;10(20):20427-20434. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.5c00573. eCollection 2025 May 27.
3
A low-cost homogenizing device for in-field and remote DNA and RNA extraction.
HardwareX. 2024 Oct 9;20:e00592. doi: 10.1016/j.ohx.2024.e00592. eCollection 2024 Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
SARS-CoV-2 in the U.S. Military - Lessons for Civil Society.
N Engl J Med. 2020 Dec 17;383(25):2472-2473. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe2032179. Epub 2020 Nov 11.
2
SARS-CoV-2: Comparative analysis of different RNA extraction methods.
J Virol Methods. 2021 Jan;287:114008. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2020.114008. Epub 2020 Nov 4.
3
Clinical evaluation of the BioFire® Respiratory Panel 2.1 and detection of SARS-CoV-2.
J Clin Virol. 2020 Aug;129:104538. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104538. Epub 2020 Jul 6.
4
Nasopharyngeal Swabs Are More Sensitive Than Oropharyngeal Swabs for COVID-19 Diagnosis and Monitoring the SARS-CoV-2 Load.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2020 Jun 18;7:334. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2020.00334. eCollection 2020.
5
The Unique Impact of COVID-19 on Older Adults in Rural Areas.
J Aging Soc Policy. 2020 Jul-Oct;32(4-5):396-402. doi: 10.1080/08959420.2020.1770036. Epub 2020 Jun 1.
6
Clinical Significance of a High SARS-CoV-2 Viral Load in the Saliva.
J Korean Med Sci. 2020 May 25;35(20):e195. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2020.35.e195.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验