Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Department of Internal Medicine, North Hospital of Shenyang Fourth People's Hospital, Shenyang, China.
Ann Palliat Med. 2021 Nov;10(11):11821-11829. doi: 10.21037/apm-21-2996.
Probiotics have been widely used in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) due to their special conditioning effects on the intestinal flora, but their efficacy in inducing and maintaining remission is still controversial. In the present study, we analyzed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the treatment of probiotics in IBD to systematically evaluate the efficacy of probiotics on the induction and maintenance of remission of IBD.
PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, Web of Science, Chinese Journal Full-text Database, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, Wanfang, and Weipu databases were searched for RCTs on the treatment of probiotics in IBD induction and/or maintenance of remission. Two researchers independently extracted literature data and cross-checked the extracted data. The Cochrane bias risk assessment tool and the Jadad score were used to evaluate the quality of the literature. RevMan 5.20 software was used for the meta-analysis.
A total of ten RCTs were included, which included 777 patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD). Meta-analysis showed that there was no significant difference between the clinical recurrence rate of probiotics in the CD remission phase and the control group [relative risk (RR): 0.80, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.61-1.06, P=0.12]. The clinical recurrence rate of UC in remission phase, the efficacy of probiotics compared with control group were not significantly different (RR: 1.07, 95% CI: 0.80-1.42, P=0.65). The induction remission rate of UC during the active phase, the efficacy of probiotics is better than that of the control group (RR: 1.47, 95% CI: 1.09-1.98, P=0.01).
In the present study, a systematic analysis of the efficacy of probiotics in CD and UC found that probiotics can induce remission during the active period of UC, but have no obvious therapeutic advantage in maintaining CD and UC remission.
由于益生菌对肠道菌群具有特殊的调节作用,因此已广泛用于治疗炎症性肠病(IBD)。但是,其诱导和维持缓解的功效仍存在争议。在本研究中,我们分析了益生菌治疗 IBD 的随机对照试验(RCT),以系统评估益生菌对 IBD 诱导和维持缓解的疗效。
检索了 PubMed、Cochrane 中央对照试验注册库、Embase、Web of Science、中国期刊全文数据库、中国生物医学文献数据库、万方和维普数据库中关于益生菌治疗 IBD 诱导和/或维持缓解的 RCT。两位研究人员独立提取文献数据并交叉核对提取的数据。使用 Cochrane 偏倚风险评估工具和 Jadad 评分评估文献质量。使用 RevMan 5.20 软件进行荟萃分析。
共纳入 10 项 RCT,包括 777 例溃疡性结肠炎(UC)和克罗恩病(CD)患者。Meta 分析显示,益生菌在 CD 缓解期与对照组相比,临床复发率无显著差异[相对风险(RR):0.80,95%置信区间(CI):0.61-1.06,P=0.12]。UC 缓解期的临床复发率、益生菌与对照组的疗效无显著差异(RR:1.07,95% CI:0.80-1.42,P=0.65)。UC 活动期诱导缓解率,益生菌疗效优于对照组(RR:1.47,95% CI:1.09-1.98,P=0.01)。
本研究系统分析了益生菌在 CD 和 UC 中的疗效,发现益生菌可诱导 UC 活动期缓解,但对维持 CD 和 UC 缓解无明显治疗优势。