Suppr超能文献

帕博利珠单抗对比化疗用于 KEYNOTE-181 亚洲人群随机对照试验中的食管鳞癌患者。

Pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy for patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma enrolled in the randomized KEYNOTE-181 trial in Asia.

机构信息

Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China.

PLA Cancer Centre of Nanjing Bayi Hospital, Nanjing, China.

出版信息

ESMO Open. 2022 Feb;7(1):100341. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100341. Epub 2021 Dec 29.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In the randomized phase III KEYNOTE-181 study, pembrolizumab prolonged overall survival (OS) compared with chemotherapy as second-line therapy in patients with advanced esophageal cancer and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) combined positive score (CPS) ≥10. We report a post hoc subgroup analysis of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) enrolled in KEYNOTE-181 in Asia, including patients from the KEYNOTE-181 China extension study.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Three hundred and forty Asian patients with advanced/metastatic ESCC were enrolled in KEYNOTE-181, including the China cohort. Patients were randomly assigned 1 : 1 to receive pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks for ≤2 years or investigator's choice of paclitaxel, docetaxel, or irinotecan. OS, progression-free survival, response, and safety were analyzed without formal comparisons. OS was evaluated based on PD-L1 CPS expression level.

RESULTS

In Asian patients with ESCC, median OS was 10.0 months with pembrolizumab and 6.5 months with chemotherapy [hazard ratio (HR), 0.63; 95% CI 0.50-0.80; nominal P < 0.0001]. Median progression-free survival was 2.3 months with pembrolizumab and 3.1 months with chemotherapy (HR, 0.79; 95% CI 0.63-0.99; nominal P = 0.020). Objective response rate was 17.1% with pembrolizumab and 7.1% with chemotherapy; median duration of response was 10.5 months and 7.7 months, respectively. In patients with PD-L1 CPS <1 tumors (pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy), the HR was 0.99 (95% CI 0.56-1.72); the HR (95% CI) for death was better for patients with PD-L1 CPS cut-offs >1 [CPS ≥1, 0.57 (0.44-0.75); CPS ≥5, 0.56 (0.41-0.76); CPS ≥10, 0.53 (0.37-0.75)]. Treatment-related adverse events were reported in 71.8% of patients in the pembrolizumab group and 89.8% in the chemotherapy group; grade 3-5 events were reported in 20.0% and 44.6%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Pembrolizumab monotherapy demonstrated promising efficacy in Asian patients with ESCC, with fewer treatment-related adverse events than chemotherapy. PD-L1 CPS ≥1 is an appropriate cut-off and a predictive marker of pembrolizumab efficacy in Asian patients with ESCC.

摘要

背景

在随机 III 期 KEYNOTE-181 研究中,与化疗二线治疗相比,帕博利珠单抗延长了晚期食管癌和程序性死亡配体 1(PD-L1)联合阳性评分(CPS)≥10 的患者的总生存期(OS)。我们报告了 KEYNOTE-181 中入组的亚洲食管鳞状细胞癌(ESCC)患者的事后亚组分析,包括 KEYNOTE-181 中国扩展研究中的患者。

方法

340 名晚期/转移性 ESCC 亚洲患者入组 KEYNOTE-181,包括中国队列。患者按 1:1 随机分配接受帕博利珠单抗 200mg 每 3 周治疗≤2 年或研究者选择紫杉醇、多西他赛或伊立替康。未进行正式比较分析 OS、无进展生存期、缓解率和安全性。OS 根据 PD-L1 CPS 表达水平进行评估。

结果

在亚洲 ESCC 患者中,帕博利珠单抗组的中位 OS 为 10.0 个月,化疗组为 6.5 个月(风险比[HR],0.63;95%CI 0.50-0.80;名义 P<0.0001)。帕博利珠单抗组中位无进展生存期为 2.3 个月,化疗组为 3.1 个月(HR,0.79;95%CI 0.63-0.99;名义 P=0.020)。帕博利珠单抗组客观缓解率为 17.1%,化疗组为 7.1%;中位缓解持续时间分别为 10.5 个月和 7.7 个月。在 PD-L1 CPS<1 肿瘤(帕博利珠单抗与化疗)的患者中,HR 为 0.99(95%CI 0.56-1.72);PD-L1 CPS 截断值>1 的患者死亡风险更好[CPS≥1,0.57(0.44-0.75);CPS≥5,0.56(0.41-0.76);CPS≥10,0.53(0.37-0.75)]。帕博利珠单抗组 71.8%的患者和化疗组 89.8%的患者报告了治疗相关不良事件;帕博利珠单抗组和化疗组分别有 20.0%和 44.6%的患者报告了 3-5 级事件。

结论

帕博利珠单抗单药治疗在亚洲 ESCC 患者中显示出良好的疗效,与化疗相比,治疗相关不良事件更少。PD-L1 CPS≥1 是帕博利珠单抗在亚洲 ESCC 患者中疗效的合适截断值和预测标志物。

相似文献

2
Randomized Phase III KEYNOTE-181 Study of Pembrolizumab Versus Chemotherapy in Advanced Esophageal Cancer.
J Clin Oncol. 2020 Dec 10;38(35):4138-4148. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.01888. Epub 2020 Oct 7.

引用本文的文献

6
Efficacy and safety of PD-1 Monoclonal antibodies in the treatment of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: Systematic review and meta Regression.
Heliyon. 2024 Jul 14;10(14):e34042. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34042. eCollection 2024 Jul 30.
7
Advancements in the research of immune checkpoint inhibitors for the treatment of advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Am J Cancer Res. 2024 May 15;14(5):1981-1998. doi: 10.62347/XUWC6412. eCollection 2024.
8
The efficacy-associated biomarkers for immune checkpoint inhibitors in gastrointestinal cancer: a literature review.
J Gastrointest Oncol. 2024 Feb 29;15(1):514-528. doi: 10.21037/jgo-23-843. Epub 2024 Feb 28.
9
Immune checkpoint inhibitors chemotherapy as second-line therapy for advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review and economic evaluation.
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2024 Feb 28;17:17562848241233134. doi: 10.1177/17562848241233134. eCollection 2024.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验