Suppr超能文献

培养开放科学的“思维模式”。

Developing an open science 'mindset'.

作者信息

Hagger Martin S

机构信息

Department of Psychological Sciences and Health Sciences Research Institute, University of California, Merced, CA, USA.

Faculty of Sport and Health Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland.

出版信息

Health Psychol Behav Med. 2021 Dec 26;10(1):1-21. doi: 10.1080/21642850.2021.2012474. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Identification of widespread biases present in reported research findings in many scientific disciplines, including psychology, such as failures to replicate and the likely extensive application of questionable research practices, has raised serious concerns over the reliability and trustworthiness of scientific research. This has led to the development of, and advocacy for, 'open science' practices, including data, materials, analysis, and output sharing, pre-registration of study predictions and analysis plans, and increased access to published research findings. Implementation of such practices has been enthusiastic in some quarters, but literacy in, and adoption of, these practices has lagged behind among many researchers in the scientific community.

ADVANCES

In the current article I propose that researchers adopt an open science 'mindset', a comprehensive approach to open science predicated on researchers' operating under the basic assumption that, wherever possible, open science practices will be a central component of all steps of their research projects. The primary, defining feature of the mindset is a commitment to open science principles in all research projects from inception to dissemination. Other features of the mindset include the assumption that all components of research projects (e.g. pre-registered hypotheses, protocols, materials, analysis plans, data, and output) will be accessible broadly; pro-active selection of open fora to disseminate research components and findings; open and transparent dissemination of reports of the research findings in advance of, and after, formal publication; and active promotion of open science practices through education, modeling, and advocacy.

CONCLUSION

The open science mindset is a 'farm to fork' approach to open science aimed at promoting comprehensive quality in application of open science, and widening participation in open science practices so that they become the norm in research in health psychology and behavioral medicine going forward.

摘要

背景

在包括心理学在内的许多科学学科中,已报告的研究结果中存在广泛的偏差,如无法重复以及可能广泛应用有问题的研究方法,这引发了人们对科学研究可靠性和可信度的严重担忧。这导致了“开放科学”实践的发展和倡导,包括数据、材料、分析和成果共享,研究预测和分析计划的预注册,以及增加对已发表研究结果的获取。在某些方面,此类实践的实施热情高涨,但科学界许多研究人员对这些实践的了解和采用却滞后了。

进展

在当前文章中,我提议研究人员采用一种开放科学“思维模式”,这是一种全面的开放科学方法,其前提是研究人员在基本假设下开展工作,即只要有可能,开放科学实践将成为其研究项目所有步骤的核心组成部分。这种思维模式的主要定义特征是在从研究项目开始到传播的所有阶段都致力于开放科学原则。这种思维模式的其他特征包括假设研究项目的所有组成部分(如预注册的假设、方案、材料、分析计划、数据和成果)将广泛可用;积极选择开放论坛来传播研究组成部分和成果;在正式发表之前和之后公开透明地传播研究结果报告;以及通过教育、示范和倡导积极推广开放科学实践。

结论

开放科学思维模式是一种从“农场到餐桌”的开放科学方法,旨在提高开放科学应用的全面质量,并扩大开放科学实践的参与度,使它们在未来成为健康心理学和行为医学研究的规范。

相似文献

1
Developing an open science 'mindset'.
Health Psychol Behav Med. 2021 Dec 26;10(1):1-21. doi: 10.1080/21642850.2021.2012474. eCollection 2022.
2
Open science practices in the false memory literature.
Memory. 2024 Sep;32(8):1115-1127. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2024.2387108. Epub 2024 Aug 5.
3
Adapting Open Science and Pre-registration to Longitudinal Research.
Infant Child Dev. 2024 Jan-Feb;33(1). doi: 10.1002/icd.2315. Epub 2022 Apr 22.
4
The landscape of open science in behavioral addiction research: Current practices and future directions.
J Behav Addict. 2023 Oct 5;12(4):862-870. doi: 10.1556/2006.2023.00052. Print 2023 Dec 22.
5
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
6
Assessing Open Science practices in physical activity behaviour change intervention evaluations.
BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2022 May 23;8(2):e001282. doi: 10.1136/bmjsem-2021-001282. eCollection 2022.
7
Principles of open, transparent and reproducible science in author guidelines of sleep research and chronobiology journals.
Wellcome Open Res. 2021 Feb 26;5:172. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.16111.2. eCollection 2020.
8
Open Science Practices in Gambling Research Publications (2016-2019): A Scoping Review.
J Gambl Stud. 2023 Jun;39(2):987-1011. doi: 10.1007/s10899-022-10120-y. Epub 2022 Jun 9.
9
Psychology needs to get tired of winning.
R Soc Open Sci. 2022 Jun 22;9(6):220099. doi: 10.1098/rsos.220099. eCollection 2022 Jun.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors affecting registered nurses' participation and utilisation of clinical research in Namibia.
Curationis. 2025 Feb 25;48(1):e1-e9. doi: 10.4102/curationis.v48i1.2695.
2
Use It or Lose It: Facilitating the Use of Interactive Data Apps in Psychological Research Data Sharing.
Eur J Psychol. 2024 Aug 30;20(3):202-219. doi: 10.5964/ejop.12811. eCollection 2024 Aug.
4
Seeing oneself as a data reuser: How subjectification activates the drivers of data reuse in science.
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 18;17(8):e0272153. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272153. eCollection 2022.
6
Social cognition theories and behavior change in COVID-19: A conceptual review.
Behav Res Ther. 2022 Jul;154:104095. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2022.104095. Epub 2022 Apr 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Psychologists update their beliefs about effect sizes after replication studies.
Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Dec;5(12):1663-1673. doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01220-7. Epub 2021 Nov 22.
2
A Multisite Preregistered Paradigmatic Test of the Ego-Depletion Effect.
Psychol Sci. 2021 Oct;32(10):1566-1581. doi: 10.1177/0956797621989733. Epub 2021 Sep 14.
3
A Multilab Replication of the Ego Depletion Effect.
Soc Psychol Personal Sci. 2021 Jan 1;12(1):14-24. doi: 10.1177/1948550619887702. Epub 2020 Apr 3.
4
Reflexivity and humility evoke a transformable methodology in a post disaster context.
Health Psychol Behav Med. 2021 Jan 28;9(1):1-24. doi: 10.1080/21642850.2020.1862661.
5
Bayesian evaluation of behavior change interventions: a brief introduction and a practical example.
Health Psychol Behav Med. 2018 Apr 11;6(1):49-78. doi: 10.1080/21642850.2018.1428102.
7
An extended theory of planned behavior for parent-for-child health behaviors: A meta-analysis.
Health Psychol. 2020 Oct;39(10):863-878. doi: 10.1037/hea0000940. Epub 2020 Jun 29.
8
The rise of preprints in chemistry.
Nat Chem. 2020 Jun;12(6):499-502. doi: 10.1038/s41557-020-0477-5.
9
A consensus-based transparency checklist.
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Jan;4(1):4-6. doi: 10.1038/s41562-019-0772-6.
10
Opinion: Why institutional review boards should have a role in the open science movement.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Oct 22;116(43):21336-21338. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1916420116.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验