Department of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Evotec, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2022 Mar 31;77(4):880-902. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkab505.
Given the low treatment success rates of drug-resistant tuberculosis (TB), novel TB drugs are urgently needed. The landscape of TB treatment has changed considerably over the last decade with the approval of three new compounds: bedaquiline, delamanid and pretomanid. Of these, delamanid and pretomanid belong to the same class of drugs, the nitroimidazoles. In order to close the knowledge gap on how delamanid and pretomanid compare with each other, we summarize the main findings from preclinical research on these two compounds. We discuss the compound identification, mechanism of action, drug resistance, in vitro activity, in vivo pharmacokinetic profiles, and preclinical in vivo activity and efficacy. Although delamanid and pretomanid share many similarities, several differences could be identified. One finding of particular interest is that certain Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates have been described that are resistant to either delamanid or pretomanid, but with preserved susceptibility to the other compound. This might imply that delamanid and pretomanid could replace one another in certain regimens. Regarding bactericidal activity, based on in vitro and preclinical in vivo activity, delamanid has lower MICs and higher mycobacterial load reductions at lower drug concentrations and doses compared with pretomanid. However, when comparing in vivo preclinical bactericidal activity at dose levels equivalent to currently approved clinical doses based on drug exposure, this difference in activity between the two compounds fades. However, it is important to interpret these comparative results with caution knowing the variability inherent in preclinical in vitro and in vivo models.
鉴于耐药结核病(TB)的治疗成功率较低,迫切需要新型 TB 药物。在过去十年中,随着三种新化合物(贝达喹啉、德拉马尼和普托马尼)的批准,结核病的治疗格局发生了重大变化。其中,德拉马尼和普托马尼属于同一类药物,即硝基咪唑类药物。为了缩小对德拉马尼和普托马尼相互比较的认识差距,我们总结了这两种化合物的临床前研究的主要发现。我们讨论了化合物的鉴定、作用机制、耐药性、体外活性、体内药代动力学特征以及临床前体内活性和疗效。虽然德拉马尼和普托马尼有许多相似之处,但也存在一些差异。一个特别有趣的发现是,某些结核分枝杆菌分离株已被描述为对德拉马尼或普托马尼耐药,但对另一种化合物仍保持敏感性。这可能意味着在某些方案中,德拉马尼和普托马尼可以相互替代。关于杀菌活性,基于体外和临床前体内活性,与普托马尼相比,德拉马尼在较低的药物浓度和剂量下具有更低的 MIC 和更高的结核分枝杆菌负荷减少。然而,当比较基于药物暴露的等效于目前批准的临床剂量的体内预临床杀菌活性时,这两种化合物之间的活性差异消失了。然而,鉴于临床前体外和体内模型固有的可变性,在解释这些比较结果时需要谨慎。