Suppr超能文献

免疫疗法用 α11 干扰素,而非 β 干扰素,可控制持续性逆转录病毒感染。

Immunotherapy With Interferon α11, But Not Interferon Beta, Controls Persistent Retroviral Infection.

机构信息

Institute for Virology, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.

Institute for Translational HIV Research, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.

出版信息

Front Immunol. 2022 Jan 20;12:809774. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.809774. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

Type I Interferons (IFNs), including numerous IFNα subtypes and IFNβ, are key molecules during innate and adaptive immune responses against viral infections. These cytokines exert various non-redundant biological activities, although binding to the same receptor. Persistent viral infections are often characterized by increased IFN signatures implicating a potential role of type I IFNs in disease pathogenesis. Using the well-established Friend retrovirus (FV) mouse model, we compared the therapeutic efficacy of IFNα11 and IFNβ in acute and chronic retroviral infection. We observed a strong antiviral activity of both IFNs during acute FV infection, whereas only IFNα11 and not IFNβ could also control persistent FV infection. The therapeutic treatment with IFNα11 induced the expression of antiviral IFN-stimulated genes (ISG) and improved cytotoxic T cell responses. Finally, dysfunctional CD8 T cells solely regained cytotoxicity after IFNα11 treatment. Our data provide evidence for opposing activities of type I IFNs during chronic retroviral infections. IFNβ was shown to be involved in immune dysfunction in chronic infections, whereas IFNα11 had a strong antiviral potential and reactivated exhausted T cells during persistent retroviral infection. In contrast, during acute infection, both type I IFNs were able to efficiently suppress FV replication.

摘要

I 型干扰素(IFN),包括许多 IFNα 亚型和 IFNβ,是针对病毒感染的先天和适应性免疫反应中的关键分子。这些细胞因子虽然结合相同的受体,但具有各种非冗余的生物学活性。持续性病毒感染通常表现出 IFN 特征增加,这表明 I 型 IFNs 在疾病发病机制中具有潜在作用。我们使用成熟的 Friend 逆转录病毒(FV)小鼠模型,比较了 IFNα11 和 IFNβ 在急性和慢性逆转录病毒感染中的治疗效果。我们观察到在急性 FV 感染期间,这两种 IFN 都具有很强的抗病毒活性,而只有 IFNα11 而不是 IFNβ 也可以控制持续性 FV 感染。IFNα11 的治疗性处理诱导了抗病毒 IFN 刺激基因(ISG)的表达,并改善了细胞毒性 T 细胞反应。最后,只有在 IFNα11 治疗后,功能失调的 CD8 T 细胞才恢复了细胞毒性。我们的数据为 I 型 IFNs 在慢性逆转录病毒感染期间的拮抗作用提供了证据。IFNβ 被证明参与慢性感染中的免疫功能障碍,而 IFNα11 在持续性逆转录病毒感染期间具有很强的抗病毒潜力,并重新激活了耗竭的 T 细胞。相比之下,在急性感染期间,两种 I 型 IFNs 都能够有效地抑制 FV 复制。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b852/8810532/7d300f0df273/fimmu-12-809774-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验