Washington State University Elson S Floyd College of Medicine, 1100 Olive Way Suite 1200, Seattle, WA, 98101, USA.
Missouri Breaks Industries Research, Inc., Eagle Butte, USA.
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2022 Jul;57(7):1421-1433. doi: 10.1007/s00127-022-02237-7. Epub 2022 Feb 14.
Our study examined psychosocial risk and protective features affecting cardiovascular and mortality disparities in American Indians, including stress, anger, cynicism, trauma, depression, quality of life, and social support.
The Strong Heart Family Study cohort recruited American Indian adults from 12 communities over 3 regions in 2001-2003 (N = 2786). Psychosocial measures included Cohen Perceived Stress, Spielberger Anger Expression, Cook-Medley cynicism subscale, symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder, Centers for Epidemiologic Studies Depression scale, Short Form 12-a quality of life scale, and the Social Support and Social Undermining scale. Cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality were evaluated by surveillance and physician adjudication through 2017.
Participants were middle-aged, 40% male, with mean 12 years formal education. Depression symptoms were correlated with anger, cynicism, poor quality of life, isolation, criticism; better social support was correlated with lower cynicism, anger, and trauma. Adjusted time-to-event regressions found that depression, (poor) quality of life, and social isolation scores formed higher risk for mortality and cardiovascular events, and social support was associated with lower risk. Social support partially explained risk associations in causal mediation analyses.
Altogether, our findings suggest that social support is associated with better mood and quality of life; and lower cynicism, stress, and disease risk-even when said risk may be increased by comorbidities. Future research should examine whether enhancing social support can prospectively reduce risk, as an efficient, cost-effective intervention opportunity that may be enacted at the community level.
我们的研究考察了影响美国印第安人心血管疾病和死亡率差异的心理社会风险和保护因素,包括压力、愤怒、犬儒主义、创伤、抑郁、生活质量和社会支持。
Strong Heart 家族研究队列于 2001-2003 年从 3 个地区的 12 个社区招募了美国印第安成年人(N=2786)。心理社会测量包括科恩感知压力量表、斯皮尔伯格愤怒表达量表、库克-梅德利犬儒主义子量表、创伤后应激障碍症状量表、流行病学研究抑郁量表、简短形式 12 项生活质量量表和社会支持和社会破坏量表。通过监测和医生裁决,评估心血管事件和全因死亡率,直至 2017 年。
参与者年龄中位数为 40 岁,40%为男性,平均受正规教育 12 年。抑郁症状与愤怒、犬儒主义、生活质量差、孤立、批评有关;更好的社会支持与较低的犬儒主义、愤怒和创伤有关。调整后的时间事件回归发现,抑郁、(较差)生活质量和社会孤立评分与死亡率和心血管事件风险增加相关,而社会支持与风险降低相关。在因果中介分析中,社会支持部分解释了风险关联。
总的来说,我们的研究结果表明,社会支持与更好的情绪和生活质量有关;犬儒主义、压力和疾病风险较低——即使这些风险可能因合并症而增加。未来的研究应该研究增强社会支持是否可以前瞻性地降低风险,因为这是一种有效且具有成本效益的干预机会,可能在社区层面实施。