Umeizudike Kehinde Adesola, Lähteenmäki Hanna, Räisänen Ismo T, Taylor John J, Preshaw Philip M, Bissett Susan M, Tervahartiala Taina, O Nwhator Solomon, Pärnänen Pirjo, Sorsa Timo
Department of Preventive Dentistry, Faculty of Dental Sciences, College of Medicine, University of Lagos, Idi-Araba, Lagos, Nigeria.
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Diseases, University of Helsinki, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
J Periodontal Res. 2022 Jun;57(3):558-567. doi: 10.1111/jre.12985. Epub 2022 Mar 19.
The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic utility of an MMP-8 biosensor assay in differentiating periodontal health from gingivitis and periodontitis and compare it with an established time-resolved immunofluorescence assay (IFMA) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).
Currently available antibody-based assays display a wide variability in their ability to accurately measure matrix metalloproteinase-8 (MMP-8) levels in saliva.
Salivary MMP-8 levels were analyzed in 189 systemically healthy participants using an antibody-based biosensor prototype that operates using a surface acoustic wave technology and compared with IFMA and ELISA antibody assays. Participants were categorized into 3 groups: periodontal health (59), gingivitis (63), and periodontitis (67). A sub-population of participants (n = 20) with periodontitis received periodontal treatment and were monitored for 6 months.
All the assays demonstrated significantly higher salivary MMP-8 concentrations in participants with periodontitis versus gingivitis, periodontitis versus health, and gingivitis versus health (all p < .05). The biosensor data demonstrated significant correlations with IFMA (r = .354, p < .001) and ELISA (r = .681, p < .001). Significant reductions in salivary MMP-8 concentrations were detected by the biosensor (p = .030) and IFMA (p = .002) in participants with periodontitis 6 months after non-surgical periodontal treatment. IFMA had the best sensitivity (89.2%) for detecting periodontitis and gingivitis versus health and 96.6% for detecting periodontitis versus health and gingivitis. The biosensor had an AUC value of 0.81 and diagnostic accuracy of 74.2% for differentiating periodontitis and gingivitis from health; an AUC value of 0.86 and diagnostic accuracy of 82.8% for periodontitis versus health and gingivitis.
The biosensor, IFMA, and ELISA assays differentiated between periodontal health, gingivitis, and periodontitis based on salivary MMP-8 levels. Only the biosensor and, particularly, IFMA identified an effect of periodontal treatment in the participants with periodontitis. Our findings support the potential utility of salivary oral fluid aMMP-8-based point-of-care technology in the future of periodontal diagnostics.
本研究旨在确定基质金属蛋白酶-8(MMP-8)生物传感器检测法在区分牙周健康与牙龈炎及牙周炎方面的诊断效用,并将其与既定的时间分辨免疫荧光检测法(IFMA)和酶联免疫吸附测定法(ELISA)进行比较。
目前可用的基于抗体的检测法在准确测量唾液中基质金属蛋白酶-8(MMP-8)水平的能力上存在很大差异。
使用基于抗体的生物传感器原型,采用表面声波技术,对189名全身健康的参与者的唾液MMP-8水平进行分析,并与IFMA和ELISA抗体检测法进行比较。参与者被分为3组:牙周健康组(59人)、牙龈炎组(63人)和牙周炎组(67人)。对一组患有牙周炎的参与者(n = 20)进行牙周治疗,并监测6个月。
所有检测法均显示,牙周炎患者与牙龈炎患者、牙周炎患者与健康者、牙龈炎患者与健康者相比,唾液MMP-8浓度显著更高(所有p <.05)。生物传感器数据与IFMA(r =.354,p <.001)和ELISA(r =.681,p <.001)显示出显著相关性。在非手术牙周治疗6个月后,生物传感器(p =.030)和IFMA(p =.002)检测到牙周炎患者唾液MMP-8浓度显著降低。IFMA在检测牙周炎和牙龈炎与健康状态方面的灵敏度最高(89.2%),在检测牙周炎与健康和牙龈炎方面的灵敏度为96.6%。生物传感器区分牙周炎和牙龈炎与健康状态的AUC值为0.81,诊断准确率为74.2%;区分牙周炎与健康和牙龈炎的AUC值为0.86,诊断准确率为82.8%。
生物传感器、IFMA和ELISA检测法基于唾液MMP-8水平区分了牙周健康、牙龈炎和牙周炎。只有生物传感器,尤其是IFMA,在患有牙周炎的参与者中发现了牙周治疗的效果。我们的研究结果支持基于唾液口腔液中aMMP-8的即时检测技术在未来牙周诊断中的潜在效用。