Van Den Eeden Stephen K, H E M Browning Matthew, Becker Douglas A, Shan Jun, Alexeeff Stacey E, Thomas Ray G, Quesenberry Charles P, Kuo Ming
Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, USA.
Department of Parks, Recreation and Tourism Management, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA.
Environ Int. 2022 May;163:107174. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2022.107174. Epub 2022 Mar 17.
Prior studies have shown higher green cover levels are associated with beneficial health outcomes. We sought to determine if residential green cover was also associated with direct healthcare costs.
We linked residential Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) satellite data for 5,189,303 members of Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC) to direct individual healthcare costs for 2003-2015. Using generalized linear regression to adjust for confounding, we examined the association between direct healthcare costs and green cover within250, 500, and 1000 meters (m) of an individual's residence. Costs were determined from an internal cost accounting system that captures administrative and patient care costs for each clinical encounter. Sensitivity analyses included adjustments for comorbidity and an alternative measure of green cover, tree canopy.
We observed a significant inverse association between higher levels of residential green cover and lower direct healthcare costs. The relative rate of total cost for the highest compared to the lowest decile of NDVI was 0.92 (95% CI 0.90-0.93) for the 500 m buffer. The association was robust to adjustment from a broad array of confounders, found at each buffer size, and largely driven by hospitalization, and emergency department visits. Individuals in the top decile of residential green cover had adjusted healthcare costs of $374.04 (95% CI $307.31-$439.41) per person per year less than individuals living in the bottom or least green decile. Sensitivity analyses including tree canopy cover as the green space measure yielded similar findings. Analyses that included adjustment for comorbidity were consistent with the hypothesis that green cover reduces healthcare costs by improving health status.
Green cover was associated with lower direct healthcare costs, raising the possibility that residential greening can have a significant healthcare cost impact across the population.
先前的研究表明,较高的绿地覆盖率与有益的健康结果相关。我们试图确定居住绿地覆盖率是否也与直接医疗费用相关。
我们将北加利福尼亚凯撒医疗集团(KPNC)5189303名成员的居住归一化植被指数(NDVI)卫星数据与2003年至2015年的个人直接医疗费用相关联。使用广义线性回归来调整混杂因素,我们研究了个人住所周围250米、500米和1000米范围内直接医疗费用与绿地覆盖率之间的关联。费用由一个内部成本核算系统确定,该系统记录每次临床诊疗的行政和患者护理成本。敏感性分析包括对合并症的调整以及绿地覆盖率的替代指标树冠覆盖率。
我们观察到居住绿地覆盖率越高与直接医疗费用越低之间存在显著的负相关。对于500米缓冲区,NDVI最高十分位数与最低十分位数相比,总成本的相对率为0.92(95%置信区间0.90 - 0.93)。在每个缓冲区大小下,该关联对广泛的混杂因素调整具有稳健性,并且在很大程度上由住院和急诊科就诊驱动。居住绿地覆盖率处于最高十分位数的个体,其调整后的医疗费用比居住在最低或绿地最少十分位数的个体每年每人少374.04美元(95%置信区间307.31美元 - 439.41美元)。包括树冠覆盖率作为绿地空间指标的敏感性分析得出了类似的结果。包括对合并症进行调整的分析与绿地覆盖率通过改善健康状况降低医疗费用的假设一致。
绿地覆盖率与较低的直接医疗费用相关,这增加了居住绿化可能对整个人口产生重大医疗费用影响的可能性。